Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    139 Topics
    4k Posts
    M
    @uberiain at this point, when I am uninstall the old XCP-ng center software, and install the new msi, I just realized the xcp-ng keeps the settings file in Roaming folder. (C:\Users\user\AppData\Roaming\XCP-ng) When I deleted it I could re-register the servers.
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    14k Posts
    florentF
    @dnordmann the tunnel is closed. By the way the patch will be release tomorrow on latest, by the end of december on stable thank you all for your patience and your help identifying the root cause of this bug
  • 3k Topics
    26k Posts
    Bastien NolletB
    Hi @cbaguzman, We just merged a PR that should allow you to use vhd-cli check on encrypted remotes: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/9235 Please note that, as stated in the PR description, this PR changes the parameters you need to give to several vhd-cli commands, including the parameters of vhd-cli check. You can use vhd-cli check --help for details. Here's an example of a command I ran on an encrypted remote: vhd-cli check --chain 'file:///localRemoteEncryptedTEST?useVhdDirectory=true&encryptionKey=%2219876543210987654321098765432109%22' 'xo-vm-backups/695550e5-16e4-4728-6669-ac39e79f19e2/vdis/2656e4f4-efbc-47a6-95aa-0ba88632e545/7a1b144e-1ec8-44e8-9f5e-2d39119a228d/20251125T095729Z.alias.vhd' b-Nollet opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra closed feat(vhd-cli): accept all types of remotes #9235
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    37 Topics
    690 Posts
    ronan-aR
    @TestForEcho No ETA for now. Even before supporting QCOW2 on LINSTOR, we have several points to robustify (HA performance, potential race conditions, etc.). Regarding other important points: Supporting volumes larger than 2TB has significant impacts on synchronization, RAM usage, coalesce, etc. We need to find a way to cope with these changes. The coalesce algorithm should be changed to no longer depend on the write speed to the SR in order to prevent potential coalesce interruptions; this is even more crucial for LINSTOR. The coalesce behavior is not exactly the same for QCOW2, and we believe that currently this could negatively impact the API impl in the case of LINSTOR. In short: QCOW2 has led to changes that require a long-term investment in several topics before even considering supporting this format on XOSTOR.
  • 30 Topics
    85 Posts
    GlitchG
    @Davidj-0 Merci pour le retour, j'utilisais aussi une Debian pour mon test ^^