@andSmv Thanks for taking a look at it. It's not really needed for a modern platform.

@bdenv-r are you trying XOSTOR on 8.2 or 8.3 ? had many problem of performance and tap-drive locking my VDIs on 8.2 xostor would like to know if 8.3 xostor still have issues

The problem with those providers is, that the additional IP is usually L3 routed to the physical hosts IP. A better solution would be to get a /29 subnet or similar, where the gateway is handled by the provider and then configure that subnet on a specific VLAN which is available on all hosts where you want the VM's to be able to run. More work for the provider, since they have to setup the gateway IP within the /29 subnet on their router and then configure the VLAN on the switchports towards your hosts, but its the best way to make the VM's agile.

Ping @mathieuRA about this

Don't worry, you did right to ask! Quick explanation: it's exposed in XO because it's a special parameter given to the VM (a kind of a special device) detected by Windows, making it install the driver for it.

Not with XOA then (yet). We might switch XOA to UEFI in the future for that. If you are using XO from the source, sure, you can do that

@carloum70 Disk migration isn't supported by the provider yet. What you can do it's only ignore the changes to the sr_id of a given disk. For example for the first disk: lifecycle { ignore_changes = [ disk[0].sr_id ] } You can also manually do the migration in XO and then after edit your HCL to update the sr_id with the new ID. It should do the trick.

@Maelstrom96 said in Epyc VM to VM networking slow: What is the exact kernel patch that is required for the xen-platform-pci-bar-uc=false fix to work on a Linux guest? We're looking at potentially compiling our own kernel with the xen-netfront.c patch, and we would like to see about adding the other part of the Kernel code needed for the Grant table fix. Patch is in Linux since 5.19-rc. You also find it in some stable branches like 5.15. Otherwise, you can check this patch https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/ea4945df138527ed63e711cb77e3b333f7b3a4c9.1751633056.git.teddy.astie@vates.tech/

@MajorP93 I'm running with Node v24.11.0 now (on Debian 11 and 12). There have been some issues with older versions of 24, but to seems fine at this time.

@Marc.pezin said in A list of events which may be worth attending: Hello John, Thanks a lot for sharing this list of events, we’ll take a look and see which ones best fit our audience and objectives. Until now, we’ve mainly focused on events in France or nearby for logistical reasons. In fact, we’ll be at KubeCon + CloudNativeCon in Atlanta next week and it will be our first time in the US. Starting next year, as our sales and marketing teams continue to grow, we plan to expand our international presence and join more events abroad, so your suggestions come at a great time. Thanks again for the recommendations! @Marc.pezin A very good one to target (at minimum), is one of the conferences and trade shows where Bitdefender is attending. They have lots of experience at defending systems against black hats, with their services and products. Especially 0-Day vulnerabilities and malware. A product they develop is designed to defend against malware infections on virtualisation stacks like VMware vSphere, Citrix XenServer and others. If you can meet them during the event, it may give the foundations for a new partnership and/or collaboration!

@olivierlambert Thought so just wanted to check. Thank you.

@olivierlambert Fun fact -lah is short for lazy ass human AI is coming... [image: 1761837446934-feb6ff1a-7269-4c37-84b8-8ed1d64c3d68-image.png]

@CodeMercenary I spoke too soon. Came in last night and it sounded like it was ready for take-off. So I restarted the container. This is so ridiculous... I think I did get 24-48 hours of quiet. So, a recheck interval of many minutes is probably fine. I think by default they start at like 5 seconds, which is needless.

@jsox79 No I did not. Disclaimer - I inherited this FreePBX system and don't know a whole lot about it. Once I got it to boot, I tested by calling my cell from a desk phone and making a page, and both worked as expected so I'm considering everything to be working. Didn't realize re-registering modules was something I may have needed to do.

@olivierlambert Thanks that worked. Kind of obvious approach, still didn't try that

OK, thanks for the quick response

@Forza Yes it can This is how I do it https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/10834/apcupsd-install/9

@stevewest15 I believe this issue was resolved when the health check system was changed to detect network connectivity at startup so it did not need to wait for then entire VM to boot. Needs the Xen tools to be installed. I have not had an issue since this change.

@McHenry like @olivierlambert said, keep in mind that a VM with 16 CPUs will be less available than a VM with 4 vCPUs, because it's easier to have 4 vCPUs ready to work than 16 simultaneously beware of this graph, it only graph the first 16 vCPU, but you can have more working ! the visual widget is failing you. think of topology too : if you have two sockets, you can have a topology of 2 sockets with 4 cores for a 8 vCPU VM. If you have only one socket, try to keep the topology to "1 socket xx cores" for your VMs, performance wise.

Host shutdown with force flag should shutdown the VM, IIRC.