XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    431 Posts 47 Posters 172.5k Views 61 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Offline
      acebmxer
      last edited by

      Updated work servers 3 pools 6 host with Rolling Pool Update.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • Mitchel-APDM Offline
        Mitchel-APD
        last edited by

        Just updated 1 pool with 3 hosts.
        SNMP did not work anymore, config file was not changed.
        Got the following error: Authorization Error (SNMP error # 16)
        Did a yum downgrade net-snmp*

        From:

        • net-snmp.x86_64 1:5.9.3-8.1.xcpng8.3
        • net-snmp-agent-libs.x86_64 1:5.9.3-8.1.xcpng8.3
        • net-snmp-libs.x86_64 1:5.9.3-8.1.xcpng8.3

        To:

        • net-snmp.x86_64 1:5.7.2-52.1.xcpng8.3
        • net-snmp-agent-libs.x86_64 1:5.7.2-52.1.xcpng8.3
        • net-snmp-libs.x86_64 1:5.7.2-52.1.xcpng8.3

        After a service restart, SNMP worked immediately.

        rzrR semarieS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • rzrR Offline
          rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Mitchel-APD
          last edited by

          @Mitchel-APD said:

          Just updated 1 pool with 3 hosts.
          SNMP did not work anymore, config file was not changed.
          Got the following error: Authorization Error (SNMP error # 16)

          Thank you for your feedback, we're going to investigate, I see that there are many changes between both versions:

          https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/compare/v5.7.2...v5.9.3

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • semarieS Offline
            semarie @Mitchel-APD
            last edited by

            @Mitchel-APD how do you auth on SNMP ? v1, v2, v3 ? and if v3, which authProtocol/privProtocol do you use ?

            Mitchel-APDM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Mitchel-APDM Offline
              Mitchel-APD @semarie
              last edited by

              @semarie Hi,

              We are using SNMPv3 with SHA AES

              semarieS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • semarieS Offline
                semarie @Mitchel-APD
                last edited by

                @Mitchel-APD SHA1 ? I am looking if it is still supported/activated-by-default. I saw that 5.8 added SHA-2 family for RFC-7860 compliance

                semarieS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • semarieS Offline
                  semarie @semarie
                  last edited by

                  SHA`is SHA1. so I assume it is that.
                  And it seems to be still accepted in authProtocol parameter.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • semarieS Offline
                    semarie
                    last edited by

                    after testing (with net-snmp-utils 5.9.3), I have no problem with snmpv3 and SHA/AES.

                    On my testing host, snmpd server (OpenBSD):

                    • User: user1
                    • auth: AES with password123
                    • priv: AES with 321drowssap

                    From XCP-ng 8.3, with net-snmp-utils 5.9.3:
                    $ snmpbulkwalk -v3 -a SHA -A password123 -l authPriv -x AES -X 321drowssap -u user1 192.168.1.80

                    so the net-snmp client itself seems fine with SHA/AES.

                    could you share more elements ?

                    Mitchel-APDM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • Mitchel-APDM Offline
                      Mitchel-APD @semarie
                      last edited by Mitchel-APD

                      @semarie Hi,

                      Thanks for your help, I just created the user with the net-snmp-create-v3-user command, and definded SHA-256.

                      SNMP now works like before.

                      net-snmp-create-v3-user -ro -A verrysecureauthenticationpassword-a SHA-256 -X verrysecureprivacypassword--x AES snmpusername
                      
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • A Offline
                        abudef
                        last edited by

                        Hi, it seems that shutting down the host is taking an extremely long time now. I tried it in two different environments; the shutdown process starts but gets stuck on the splash screen for several minutes before finally completing. There were no active virtual machines on the hosts being shut down.

                        Does anyone have the possibility to test this in a lab? Thanks!

                        gduperreyG R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • gduperreyG Offline
                          gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @abudef
                          last edited by

                          @abudef I've updated and rebooted numerous hosts with these updates and haven't noticed any significant slowdowns.

                          Do you have any additional information in the logs?

                          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M Offline
                            MajorP93
                            last edited by

                            Can also confirm that I was able to apply this round of patches using rolling update method without any issues or slowdowns on a pool of 5 hosts.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • A Offline
                              abudef @gduperrey
                              last edited by abudef

                              @gduperrey Restart happens normally, without any noticeable delay, but shutdown takes a long time. Which logs should I specifically check?

                              (It's not a real issue, but I just needed to move servers in the lab and had to shut them down, so I noticed it.)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • R Offline
                                robertblissitt @abudef
                                last edited by

                                @abudef After the excitement from the last update cycle (see my post above from ~January 29), I kicked off a Rolling Pool Reboot this time before considering a Rolling Pool Update. During this RPR, the first host is currently hanging on its shut down right now after about 10 - 15 minutes as shown in the screenshot. I am running the previous most recent version of XCP-ng, again from January 29, 2026. I'll revisit installing these most recent updates once I get clean reboots. 🙂
                                1ce1d34e-2a48-42fc-943d-86b66c2fd596-image.jpeg

                                M G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M Offline
                                  manilx @robertblissitt
                                  last edited by manilx

                                  @robertblissitt Press ESC and you'll see what's happening

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • G Online
                                    Greg_E @robertblissitt
                                    last edited by

                                    @robertblissitt

                                    Normal for the pool master to take a bit longer but never seen 15 minutes before.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • gduperreyG Offline
                                      gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                      last edited by

                                      As explained, I haven't observed such a delay on our end during our testing.

                                      As Maniix suggests, you can see what's happening by pressing "Esc" to see which step is taking longer.

                                      From what I've heard internally, a common reason for this lengthy step is when a shared server was running on a VM and that VM was shut down. The host then takes a very long time to shut down or restart.

                                      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • P Offline
                                        ph7 @gduperrey
                                        last edited by

                                        @gduperrey
                                        In my homelab I've had the same problem for at least 18 month's
                                        when shutting down the XO-VM it hangs for 2-3 minutes when it tries to umount the remotes

                                        umount /run/xo-server/mounts/xxxxx (SMB and NFS)
                                        umount /run/xo-server/mounts/yyyyy (SMB)
                                        

                                        I did report this in an earlier thread

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M Offline
                                          manilx @ph7
                                          last edited by

                                          @ph7 This I can confirm, with XO VM.
                                          But discussion was about the host....

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • gduperreyG Offline
                                            gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                            last edited by

                                            For XO, I suggest you start a separate thread.

                                            Regarding the host issue, without more details or information, it's difficult to say anything at the moment, especially since I haven't been able to reproduce it myself.

                                            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • First post
                                              Last post