XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
-
Just updated 1 pool with 3 hosts.
SNMP did not work anymore, config file was not changed.
Got the following error: Authorization Error (SNMP error # 16)
Did a yum downgrade net-snmp*From:
- net-snmp.x86_64 1:5.9.3-8.1.xcpng8.3
- net-snmp-agent-libs.x86_64 1:5.9.3-8.1.xcpng8.3
- net-snmp-libs.x86_64 1:5.9.3-8.1.xcpng8.3
To:
- net-snmp.x86_64 1:5.7.2-52.1.xcpng8.3
- net-snmp-agent-libs.x86_64 1:5.7.2-52.1.xcpng8.3
- net-snmp-libs.x86_64 1:5.7.2-52.1.xcpng8.3
After a service restart, SNMP worked immediately.
-
Just updated 1 pool with 3 hosts.
SNMP did not work anymore, config file was not changed.
Got the following error: Authorization Error (SNMP error # 16)Thank you for your feedback, we're going to investigate, I see that there are many changes between both versions:
https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/compare/v5.7.2...v5.9.3
-
@Mitchel-APD how do you auth on SNMP ? v1, v2, v3 ? and if v3, which authProtocol/privProtocol do you use ?
-
@semarie Hi,
We are using SNMPv3 with SHA AES
-
@Mitchel-APD SHA1 ? I am looking if it is still supported/activated-by-default. I saw that 5.8 added SHA-2 family for RFC-7860 compliance
-
SHA`is SHA1. so I assume it is that.
And it seems to be still accepted in authProtocol parameter. -
after testing (with net-snmp-utils 5.9.3), I have no problem with snmpv3 and SHA/AES.
On my testing host, snmpd server (OpenBSD):
- User:
user1 - auth: AES with
password123 - priv: AES with
321drowssap
From XCP-ng 8.3, with net-snmp-utils 5.9.3:
$ snmpbulkwalk -v3 -a SHA -A password123 -l authPriv -x AES -X 321drowssap -u user1 192.168.1.80so the net-snmp client itself seems fine with SHA/AES.
could you share more elements ?
- User:
-
@semarie Hi,
Thanks for your help, I just created the user with the net-snmp-create-v3-user command, and definded SHA-256.
SNMP now works like before.
net-snmp-create-v3-user -ro -A verrysecureauthenticationpassword-a SHA-256 -X verrysecureprivacypassword--x AES snmpusername -
Hi, it seems that shutting down the host is taking an extremely long time now. I tried it in two different environments; the shutdown process starts but gets stuck on the splash screen for several minutes before finally completing. There were no active virtual machines on the hosts being shut down.
Does anyone have the possibility to test this in a lab? Thanks!
-
@abudef I've updated and rebooted numerous hosts with these updates and haven't noticed any significant slowdowns.
Do you have any additional information in the logs?
-
Can also confirm that I was able to apply this round of patches using rolling update method without any issues or slowdowns on a pool of 5 hosts.
-
@gduperrey Restart happens normally, without any noticeable delay, but shutdown takes a long time. Which logs should I specifically check?
(It's not a real issue, but I just needed to move servers in the lab and had to shut them down, so I noticed it.)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login