XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XenOrchestra not showing VM Disks on Pool (on single Server working) - XCP-ng Center is showing them

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    20 Posts 7 Posters 1.9k Views 8 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Offline
      AlexD2006 @Pilow
      last edited by

      @Pilow
      @acebmxer

      Thanx for your replies.
      And sorry, i havent seen your first reply between my last posts with the link to your existing Thread.

      So, i think this is some kind of a bigger thing.
      Will handle with care, but i have to leave for today.
      Maybe i have time to test the snapshot and revert workarounds on the weekend.
      But these are all production VMs.
      Have to coordinate.
      I have 2 NFS-SRs in the Pool.
      Will try to migrate VMs from one to the other and see if this helps.

      Kind Regards and thx again
      Alex

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C Offline
        conitrade-as
        last edited by

        Same problem here. But I noticed it only appears with the latest updates from XCP-ng 8.3. The log file shows me the following packages were updated / installed on my host:

        May 07 19:44:54 Updated: xen-libs-4.17.6-6.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:54 Updated: gnutls-3.3.29-10.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:54 Updated: 1:net-snmp-libs-5.9.3-8.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:54 Updated: ipmitool-1.8.19-11.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:54 Updated: openssh-9.8p1-1.2.3.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:54 Updated: openssh-clients-9.8p1-1.2.3.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:54 Updated: openssh-server-9.8p1-1.2.3.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:54 Updated: 1:net-snmp-agent-libs-5.9.3-8.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:55 Updated: 1:net-snmp-5.9.3-8.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:55 Updated: blktap-3.55.5-6.7.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:55 Updated: message-switch-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:55 Updated: xcp-ng-xapi-plugins-1.16.0-1.xcpng8.3.noarch
        May 07 19:44:55 Updated: xen-hypervisor-4.17.6-6.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:55 Updated: xen-dom0-libs-4.17.6-6.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:56 Updated: vhd-tool-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:56 Updated: squeezed-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:56 Updated: xen-tools-4.17.6-6.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:56 Updated: xen-dom0-tools-4.17.6-6.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:57 Updated: xcp-rrdd-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:57 Updated: xapi-tests-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:57 Updated: xo-lite-0.20.0-1.xcpng8.3.noarch
        May 07 19:44:57 Updated: wsproxy-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:58 Updated: xapi-storage-script-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:58 Updated: xcp-networkd-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:59 Updated: forkexecd-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:59 Updated: sm-cli-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:44:59 Updated: xapi-rrd2csv-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:00 Updated: rrdd-plugins-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:01 Updated: xapi-nbd-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:01 Updated: sm-fairlock-3.2.12-17.8.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:01 Updated: sm-3.2.12-17.8.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:01 Updated: xenopsd-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:01 Updated: xenopsd-cli-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:02 Updated: xenopsd-xc-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:05 Updated: xcp-ng-pv-tools-8.3-17.xcpng8.3.noarch
        May 07 19:45:05 Installed: 3:traceroute-2.1.5-2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:05 Updated: xapi-xe-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:05 Updated: qcow-stream-tool-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:08 Updated: xapi-core-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:08 Updated: xcp-ng-deps-8.3-14.noarch
        May 07 19:45:08 Updated: gnutls-utils-3.3.29-10.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:08 Updated: gnutls-devel-3.3.29-10.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:09 Updated: varstored-guard-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
        May 07 19:45:12 Updated: kernel-4.19.19-8.0.46.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64

        So I guess one of these packages could be the culprit?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C Offline
          conitrade-as
          last edited by

          Another interesting observation. On a VM where we took a snapshot today (post Windows Update install) and deleted an older snapshot, the disk shows up (both v5 and v6).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C Offline
            conitrade-as
            last edited by

            Dug a little deeper. For a VM where the disks are not shown the following XO API call fails:

            /rest/v0/vms/a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7/vdis
            {
              "error": "no such VDI ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591",
              "data": {
                "id": "ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591",
                "type": [
                  "VDI"
                ]
              }
            }
            

            Also the VDI cannot be retrieved over the XO API:

            /rest/v0/vms/a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7
            ...
             "$VBDs": [
                "4ea8a3cd-0d1b-dc60-4d9c-fd70e060f06c",
                "9f4ca686-9fc2-35a9-c3e9-c871c9f68aba"
              ],
            ...
            
            /rest/v0/vbds/9f4ca686-9fc2-35a9-c3e9-c871c9f68aba
            {
              "type": "VBD",
              "attached": false,
              "bootable": false,
              "device": "xvda",
              "is_cd_drive": false,
              "position": "0",
              "read_only": false,
              "VDI": "ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591",
              "VM": "a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7",
              "id": "9f4ca686-9fc2-35a9-c3e9-c871c9f68aba",
              "uuid": "9f4ca686-9fc2-35a9-c3e9-c871c9f68aba",
              "$pool": "93d361b7-f549-53b7-a3aa-c9695bf0abe4",
              "$poolId": "93d361b7-f549-53b7-a3aa-c9695bf0abe4",
              "_xapiRef": "OpaqueRef:1d424d94-f540-2eb4-9e52-2a9b21ec0a19"
            }
            
            /rest/v0/vdis/ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591
            {
              "error": "no such VDI ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591",
              "data": {
                "id": "ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591",
                "type": "VDI"
              }
            }
            

            However the VDI can be listed using the xe cli:

            $ xe vm-list uuid=a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7
            uuid ( RO)           : a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7
                 name-label ( RW): XXX
                power-state ( RO): halted
            
            $ xe vbd-list vm-uuid=a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7
            uuid ( RO)             : 4ea8a3cd-0d1b-dc60-4d9c-fd70e060f06c
                      vm-uuid ( RO): a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7
                vm-name-label ( RO): XXX
                     vdi-uuid ( RO): <not in database>
                        empty ( RO): true
                       device ( RO): xvdd
            
            
            uuid ( RO)             : 9f4ca686-9fc2-35a9-c3e9-c871c9f68aba
                      vm-uuid ( RO): a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7
                vm-name-label ( RO): XXX
                     vdi-uuid ( RO): ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591
                        empty ( RO): false
                       device ( RO): xvda
            
            $ xe vdi-list uuid=ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591
            uuid ( RO)                : ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591
                      name-label ( RW): XXX Disk 0
                name-description ( RW): Created by XO
                         sr-uuid ( RO): 977b7e63-bb84-57b2-3e0d-206afea553bf
                    virtual-size ( RO): 34359738368
                        sharable ( RO): false
                       read-only ( RO): false
            

            Seems almost like something changed in the XCP-ng API which XO cannot consume.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K Online
              kagbasi-wgsdac
              last edited by kagbasi-wgsdac

              Another confirmed data point, with package delta and the specific malformed field.

              Host: XCP-ng 8.3.0, xapi 26.1 (build 26.1.4), Xen 4.17.6-9.

              Setup: XO from sources (community). All VDIs vanished from the per-VM Disks tab (XO 5 and XO 6); xe and the SR Disks tab show them fine; VMs run normally. Trigger was the 8.3 host update + reboot this morning — XO build unchanged since May 28, disks visible yesterday.

              Host update delta (today): all 26.1.3-1.10 → 26.1.4-3.1 (xapi-core, xenopsd, sm-cli, sm-fairlock, xapi-storage-script, vhd-tool, message-switch, etc.), plus sm 3.2.12-17.8 → 17.9 as an independent bump.

              The malformed field. An affected live OS disk (VM running):

              is-a-snapshot: false
              snapshot-of:   <populated, points to another VDI>
              snapshot-time: <populated>
              

              A normal base VDI should have an empty snapshot-of. After the update, snapshot-of/snapshot-time are populated on real, non-snapshot base VDIs, and XO filters anything with a non-empty snapshot-of out of the per-VM Disks view — which is the disappearance.

              The VDI that snapshot-of points to is a legitimate base image in my environment (a heavily-reused Win2022 build template with a large genuine snapshot/clone lineage), so I can't tell from the host side whether the parentage links themselves changed or only the snapshot-of on live VDI labeling did. Either way, the consumer-visible effect is the same.

              REST confirms: /rest/v0/vms/<uuid>/vdis → []; /rest/v0/vdis/<uuid> → "no such VDI" for the VBD's referenced UUID, while xe vdi-list shows it.

              Caution for others: since live disks now carry snapshot-like metadata, be careful with Health-dashboard "orphan" cleanup and snapshot deletion on affected VMs until this is understood.

              Workaround that restored the per-VM Disks view: snapshot → revert → delete-snapshot (tested on a powered-off VM, immediate).

              Happy to provide more diagnostics.


              Quick Follow-up:

              Additional symptom, same root cause: ISO-SR VDIs are also affected. Pre-existing ISOs disappeared from the XO ISO picker (only ISOs uploaded after the patch still show). An affected ISO's vdi-param-list shows:

              is-a-snapshot: false
              snapshot-of:   937c3945-...   (same anchor UUID as an affected VM disk on a different SR)
              snapshot-time: 19700101T00:00:00Z   (Unix epoch — clearly synthetic)
              

              Notably the spurious snapshot-of on both an ISO VDI and an unrelated VM OS disk points to the same anchor UUID, with an epoch timestamp — so this looks like the update is stamping pre-existing VDIs with a bogus snapshot-of rather than any real lineage. VHD chains/GC are clean (GC reports no work).

              Tagging a related GitHub Issue for easy correlation - https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/9578

              Meninyelow created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

              open VM disk with status => no item found on XOA #9578

              K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K Online
                kagbasi-wgsdac @kagbasi-wgsdac
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert Any chance you can have someone please take a look at this thread? The issue persists and is creating problems for me. If someone out there has figured out the solution, kindly share, thanks.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO Offline
                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by

                  Hi,

                  I think it's a known problem, let me ping @poddingue so he gives you a quick recap on the situation (or someone from the team storage)

                  K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • K Online
                    kagbasi-wgsdac @olivierlambert
                    last edited by

                    @olivierlambert Thanks for the response, much appreciated.

                    I'm getting ready to file a bug report, as I noticed this morning that this issue is now causing a VDI-IN-USE error; preventing me from starting a VM. Fortunately, that VM isn't critical, so I want to report it and help with the troubleshooting that will lead to a fix before it spreads.

                    poddingueP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • poddingueP Offline
                      poddingue Vates 🪐 @kagbasi-wgsdac
                      last edited by

                      Here's the short version: this looks like the known "VDIs show up as snapshots" bug, and you haven't done anything wrong.
                      What happens is a metadata flag on the VDI, is-a-snapshot, gets flipped to true after some of the recent 8.3 host updates, so XO (both 5 and 6) thinks those disks are snapshots and hides them from the per-VM Disks tab, even though the VDIs are fine and xe / XCP-ng Center still show them. 🤷
                      A few older threads track the same thing, the main one is https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11715/vdi-not-showing-in-xo-5-from-source . From what's said there, the fix is expected in two parts: stopping it from happening again, and a way to repair the flag on VDIs that are already affected.
                      I don't have a timeline and could be off on the details, so please don't take that as official.
                      In the meantime people have made the disks reappear by migrating the affected VDI to another SR, or snapshot then revert then delete the snapshot, but it's a visual fix and can come back.
                      The VDI_IN_USE you're now hitting on start does sound worth its own detailed report, so yes please file it with the xapi/sm versions and that malformed is-a-snapshot field, and it'd be good to loop in @Team-Storage. Sorry you're stuck on this.

                      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K Online
                        kagbasi-wgsdac @poddingue
                        last edited by

                        @poddingue Thanks for the response. I got side tracked with another issue and didn't get that bug report filed, I'll do that as soon as possible.

                        It feels like I'm playing with a hand grenade...lol, quite scary!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post