XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.4m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Online
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      That's a good question 🤔 Are you migrating in the same pool or to a different pool?

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        matt-plan8 @olivierlambert
        last edited by

        @olivierlambert

        Same pool, I have 3 minisforum pc's I've been messing around with to learn XCP-NG, they aren't in a cluster because I got lazy after installation, but are connected via truenas iscsi as central iscsi storage.

        Loving the system overall, I could never go back to hyper-v...

        I was patching manually by moving machines and then using the gui single host patch button. I had an issue with rolling patches, and didn't really want to bug you guys over it, it's likely user error. Setup is installed from sources.

        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @matt-plan8
          last edited by stormi

          @matt-plan8 I don't understand. Pool and cluster are the same thing. Pool for XCP-ng is what VMWare calls cluster.

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            matt-plan8 @stormi
            last edited by

            @stormi sorry I consider HA a cluster, pool I consider just a group of machines in the same management domain.

            They are in a single pool, they aren't HA

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • A Offline
              archw @stormi
              last edited by

              @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta 🚀:

              yum downgrade edk2-20180522git4b8552d-1.5.1.xcpng8.3

              It didn't work. It just sits there with the attached screen.

              Capture-no-boot-uefi.PNG

              stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stormiS Offline
                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @archw
                last edited by

                @archw You're quoting the downgrade command. May I assume you tried yum update edk2 --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-ci instead and got version edk2-20220801-1.7.3.xcpng8.3.x86_64?

                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Offline
                  archw @stormi
                  last edited by

                  @stormi
                  Sorry...I cliked reply to teh wrong post.

                  Yes, I ran "yum update edk2 --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-cii" and let it install. I then rebooted the VM (several of them) and tried to start them and none worked. I then ran "yum downgrade edk2-20180522git4b8552d-1.5.1.xcpng8.3" and the VM's fired right up.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                    last edited by

                    I just published new updates for XCP-ng 8.3:

                    • edk2-20220801-1.7.3.xcpng8.3, which some of you already tested. It fixes UEFI pfSense booting.
                    • e2fsprogs-1.47.0-1.1.xcpng8.3 (and subpackages): brought to the same level as latest XCP-ng 8.2.1. If you installed using the latest test installation ISO, you already have it.
                    • r8125-module-9.012.04-1.xcpng8.3 which updates the r8125 driver.
                    gskgerG W 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                    • gskgerG Offline
                      gskger Top contributor @stormi
                      last edited by

                      @stormi While I can not test the changes, the update went well. However, the restart took a few minutes longer than expected (or I was impatient again).

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • W Offline
                        wilsonqanda @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi Nice thanks so I can run the complete update on XOA and not worry about having to remove that single edk2 anymore that wasn't working. 🙂 Will do that later

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stormiS Offline
                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                          last edited by

                          So, @ThierryEscande found the issue which made all UEFI VMs crash on @archw's server and patched it.

                          This was the last issue before we could publish XCP-ng 8.3 Beta 2, so this is good news.

                          Now, we need you all to test the patched RPM and check your UEFI VMs still work well with it: start, function normally...

                          To install it:

                          yum update edk2-20220801-1.7.3.1.xcpng8.3 --enablerepo=xcp-ng-ci
                          

                          No need to reboot, but UEFI VMs need to be restarted afterwards (when doable. If you have a specfic VM that you can't reboot yet, it's OK to leave it alone).

                          In case things do not work as expected, you can come back to the previous build with :

                          yum downgrade edk2
                          
                          A B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • A Offline
                            Andrew Top contributor @stormi
                            last edited by

                            @stormi The new version still works for me (linux/freebsd).

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • B Offline
                              bufanda @stormi
                              last edited by

                              @stormi Tested the new edk package at looks good to me. was able to reboot linux and freebsd VMs without a hitch with UEFI boot mode.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by

                                Thanks to both of you. I moved the fixed edk2 package to repo xcp-ng-base, so all testers will get it next time they update.

                                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • A Offline
                                  archw @stormi
                                  last edited by

                                  @stormi
                                  Fantastic and way to go...thanks for all your hard work!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                  • olivierlambertO Online
                                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                    last edited by

                                    Also thanks to you @archw for your feedback, that's how we like to work 👍

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stormiS Offline
                                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                      last edited by stormi

                                      Everyone: we are about to release XCP-ng 8.3 Beta 2!

                                      It was delayed by one month due to the UEFI issues discussed above, now fixed.

                                      The last thing we need is your feedback on the updated installation ISO: https://updates.xcp-ng.org/tmp/xcp-ng-8.3.0-beta2-test4.iso

                                      I hope I have more success than with the test2 ISO for which I don't remember getting any feedback 😅

                                      [Update: link updated to the test4 ISO. Don't upgrade an existing XCP-ng 8.3 alpha or beta with this: just update with XO or yum instead]

                                      W T 5 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                      • W Offline
                                        wilsonqanda @stormi
                                        last edited by

                                        @stormi after the update it seem to work well for me. Well the update from edk2 at least is working now. Haven't tried the iso.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • W Offline
                                          wilsonqanda @stormi
                                          last edited by wilsonqanda

                                          @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta 🚀:

                                          https://updates.xcp-ng.org/tmp/xcp-ng-8.3.0-beta2-test3.iso

                                          Testing it right now and migrating my VM over to see. My previous install SR was causing issue and disappearing on every restart for some reason lol (don't even know what causes it so decided to start fresh 🙂 ). So decided to might as well test the "xcp-ng-8.3.0-beta2-test3.iso" new iso you uploaded. Will provide feedback in a few minutes.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • W Offline
                                            wilsonqanda @stormi
                                            last edited by wilsonqanda

                                            @stormi
                                            Good things I notice on the new beta2-test3 iso:

                                            • "efi: EFI_MEMMAP is not enabled" used to take minutes is now down to 30 sec 🙂
                                            • host joins other host or pool really quickly (it sometime takes forever or doesn't work for me before until I manually toggle disconnect and reconnect) (hosts in pool always work fine but hosts from different pool was slow previously not sure why when they all start up at the same time is usually the issue especially when network is up slower than the hosts. I assume host search timeout before network is up.)
                                            • UEFI is definitely fixed now 🙂

                                            All good feedback. No drawback yet.

                                            Also when is NFS v4 available believe it was end of 1st quarter (March???) from what i heard 🙂 is that still true?

                                            Thanks otherwise it is good on my short test so far.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post