XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
      last edited by

      So, @ThierryEscande found the issue which made all UEFI VMs crash on @archw's server and patched it.

      This was the last issue before we could publish XCP-ng 8.3 Beta 2, so this is good news.

      Now, we need you all to test the patched RPM and check your UEFI VMs still work well with it: start, function normally...

      To install it:

      yum update edk2-20220801-1.7.3.1.xcpng8.3 --enablerepo=xcp-ng-ci

      No need to reboot, but UEFI VMs need to be restarted afterwards (when doable. If you have a specfic VM that you can't reboot yet, it's OK to leave it alone).

      In case things do not work as expected, you can come back to the previous build with :

      yum downgrade edk2
      A B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • A Offline
        Andrew Top contributor @stormi
        last edited by

        @stormi The new version still works for me (linux/freebsd).

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • B Offline
          bufanda @stormi
          last edited by

          @stormi Tested the new edk package at looks good to me. was able to reboot linux and freebsd VMs without a hitch with UEFI boot mode.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
          • stormiS Offline
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by

            Thanks to both of you. I moved the fixed edk2 package to repo xcp-ng-base, so all testers will get it next time they update.

            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • A Offline
              archw @stormi
              last edited by

              @stormi
              Fantastic and way to go...thanks for all your hard work!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                Also thanks to you @archw for your feedback, that's how we like to work 👍

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Offline
                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by stormi

                  Everyone: we are about to release XCP-ng 8.3 Beta 2!

                  It was delayed by one month due to the UEFI issues discussed above, now fixed.

                  The last thing we need is your feedback on the updated installation ISO: https://updates.xcp-ng.org/tmp/xcp-ng-8.3.0-beta2-test4.iso

                  I hope I have more success than with the test2 ISO for which I don't remember getting any feedback 😅

                  [Update: link updated to the test4 ISO. Don't upgrade an existing XCP-ng 8.3 alpha or beta with this: just update with XO or yum instead]

                  W T 5 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • W Offline
                    wilsonqanda @stormi
                    last edited by

                    @stormi after the update it seem to work well for me. Well the update from edk2 at least is working now. Haven't tried the iso.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • W Offline
                      wilsonqanda @stormi
                      last edited by wilsonqanda

                      @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta 🚀:

                      https://updates.xcp-ng.org/tmp/xcp-ng-8.3.0-beta2-test3.iso

                      Testing it right now and migrating my VM over to see. My previous install SR was causing issue and disappearing on every restart for some reason lol (don't even know what causes it so decided to start fresh 🙂 ). So decided to might as well test the "xcp-ng-8.3.0-beta2-test3.iso" new iso you uploaded. Will provide feedback in a few minutes.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • W Offline
                        wilsonqanda @stormi
                        last edited by wilsonqanda

                        @stormi
                        Good things I notice on the new beta2-test3 iso:

                        • "efi: EFI_MEMMAP is not enabled" used to take minutes is now down to 30 sec 🙂
                        • host joins other host or pool really quickly (it sometime takes forever or doesn't work for me before until I manually toggle disconnect and reconnect) (hosts in pool always work fine but hosts from different pool was slow previously not sure why when they all start up at the same time is usually the issue especially when network is up slower than the hosts. I assume host search timeout before network is up.)
                        • UEFI is definitely fixed now 🙂

                        All good feedback. No drawback yet.

                        Also when is NFS v4 available believe it was end of 1st quarter (March???) from what i heard 🙂 is that still true?

                        Thanks otherwise it is good on my short test so far.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • Tristis OrisT Offline
                          Tristis Oris Top contributor
                          last edited by Tristis Oris

                          With previous iso i got some weird single problems, but can't reproduce them - mng interface resert after reboot, can't connect to XO, problems with update.
                          Now it works at first attempt. And it show hostname at ssh instead of ip.

                          also notice about "efi: EFI_MEMMAP is not enabled".

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                            last edited by stormi

                            "efi: EFI_MEMMAP is not enabled" is a normal message in the context of XCP-ng. It's just a bit annoying because it raises questions for many users.

                            Regarding NFSv4 (more precisely: support for servers which only offer NFSv4 and not 3+4), isn't support already present?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stormiS Offline
                              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                              last edited by

                              Oh, no, you're right, its support is in the next batch of updates, which will come shortly after the release of beta 2.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • AnonabharA Offline
                                Anonabhar
                                last edited by

                                Hi All,

                                Let me first say that I am using 8.3 Beta in my home lab and I quite like it. Seems stable and all is good in the world so far..

                                But I was wondering something. If 8.3 is not going to be a LTR, is there any point in upgrading my production stacks to it or should I just wait for 8.4 (I presume that is what will be the LTR).

                                I am assuming that if you needed some latest and greatest bleeding feature (maybe TPM?) then you should go 8.3?

                                I just dont want to go through the trouble of upgrading everything to 8.3 and then 6 months later having to do it again for 8.4

                                Kind Regards,
                                Peg

                                J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • J Offline
                                  john.c @Anonabhar
                                  last edited by john.c

                                  @Anonabhar said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta 🚀:

                                  Hi All,

                                  Let me first say that I am using 8.3 Beta in my home lab and I quite like it. Seems stable and all is good in the world so far..

                                  But I was wondering something. If 8.3 is not going to be a LTR, is there any point in upgrading my production stacks to it or should I just wait for 8.4 (I presume that is what will be the LTR).

                                  I am assuming that if you needed some latest and greatest bleeding feature (maybe TPM?) then you should go 8.3?

                                  I just dont want to go through the trouble of upgrading everything to 8.3 and then 6 months later having to do it again for 8.4

                                  Kind Regards,
                                  Peg

                                  Well 8.3 is capable of IPv6 while 8.2 is only capable of IPv4 so, if support for IPv6 is required in production then testing in the lab 8.3 would help prepare for next LTS release which features of 8.3 will likely be part of.

                                  It's also the first release to include TPM support so it helps for lab testing. As well as having enhancements and features which can only be used with it in Xen Orchestra (XO) and for organisations (XOA).

                                  Eventually when 8.3 is released it will be stable, however it will not be long term supported. So it depends upon the delay for support, LTS releases are supported for longer than standard releases as well as more stable due to stability, security and predictable migration paths being the aim.

                                  Standard releases are supported for a shorter time span but have higher performance, new features and support for the latest hardware.

                                  Check out https://xcp-ng.org/docs/releases.html#lts-releases to find out the Lifecycle for LTS releases. By the End of Support of 8.2 LTS there's likely to be aimed for a new LTS before then a new LTS release. It's going to have the features of 8.3 at the very least.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • P Offline
                                    Paolo
                                    last edited by

                                    I suppose i can install new servers with xcp-ng-8.3.0-beta2-test3.iso and then update to rc/stable release with yum update.
                                    Am i correct?

                                    Regards
                                    Paolo

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stormiS Offline
                                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                      last edited by

                                      Ideally you'd reinstall to be sure you have a clean system without leftovers from previous test packages. We try to provide a clean update path, but we can't test all combinations of situations.

                                      When the final release is there, you can use the installation ISO to upgrade your hosts, which will retain local SRs and metadata. Only customizations outside what the API (XAPI) offers may have to be done again.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • T Offline
                                        ThierryC01 @stormi
                                        last edited by

                                        @stormi Where can we find a release notes for the beta2 ?

                                        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ThierryC01
                                          last edited by

                                          @ThierryC01 Mostly here: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/68789

                                          and in a future blog post.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • K Offline
                                            kait
                                            last edited by

                                            using the 8.3 beta in my homelab
                                            so far everything seems stable, i have not had an opportunity to try out vtpm yet but everything else workd great so far

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post