XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Veeam backup with XCP NG

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
    21 Posts 6 Posters 288 Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Offline
      acebmxer
      last edited by

      and when not accidentally routing the backups... save 6 min..

      Screenshot 2025-10-01 224148.png

      host
      Screenshot 2025-10-01 224223.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • florentF Offline
        florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @Pilow
        last edited by

        @Pilow said in Veeam backup with XCP NG:

        @flakpyro thank you 😃

        @florent , would be nice to add this to XCP backup ? merge progress

        You can check the toggle "merge sychronously" in the advanced block of the backup job, to at least know when the merge is done

        (we intend to make this the default choice in the near future)

        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • P Offline
          Pilow @florent
          last edited by Pilow

          @florent i always check it, to avoid a merging process to be disrupted by another job.

          so when the backup tranfer is done (we have a progress bar), the job just sits there.. .merging in background, without progress bar or percentage.
          5 minutes later, the backup job finishes.

          so your stats are flawed (used data over time) if time of merging is taken in account

          see what I mean ?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Online
            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by

            Merging is another process than transfer. Transfer is between XCP-ng to XO (then to BR), while merging is only between XO and BR. The impact is very different (eg on the XCP-ng side, nothing happening during the merge)

            P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P Offline
              Pilow @olivierlambert
              last edited by

              @olivierlambert I get you.

              Same in veeam and synthetic fulls, it's only between the server/proxy and the repository.
              but we get a progressing percentage while the job sits while doing the synthetic full.

              would be cool to "see" the progress of merging.
              why ? bad habits from previous technologies used I guess.

              florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • florentF Offline
                florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @Pilow
                last edited by

                @Pilow said in Veeam backup with XCP NG:

                @olivierlambert I get you.

                Same in veeam and synthetic fulls, it's only between the server/proxy and the repository.
                but we get a progressing percentage while the job sits while doing the synthetic full.

                would be cool to "see" the progress of merging.
                why ? bad habits from previous technologies used I guess.

                Giving better observability is something we are working actively on , this is tightly coupled with being able to stop a task, and I hope we will be able to show the progress soon

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                • R Offline
                  redneckitguy @Pilow
                  last edited by

                  @Pilow

                  Nice! Has anyone tried item level restore, particularly those of us stuck in the Windows world and running Active Directory or MS SQL Server? That is an area where Veeam excels.

                  We'll probably give it a try soon. We even have a full license that is still in use while we wrap up our migration from Hyper-V to XCP-ng which we were keeping for a few other specialty use cases. We still plan to use XOA for most backups, especially the Linux VMs, as long as we can get the immutability issues we're facing fixed.

                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A Offline
                    acebmxer @redneckitguy
                    last edited by acebmxer

                    @redneckitguy
                    File level restore works out of box but application restore ie Active Directory not so much. Still testing.

                    Edit - The backup job from XCP-NG does not offer the option for Application aware backup. When backing up via the agent then yes but still two separate backups.

                    Screenshot 2025-10-03 103535.png

                    Screenshot 2025-10-03 103549.png

                    Screenshot 2025-10-03 103605.png

                    Screenshot 2025-10-03 103626.png

                    A R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Offline
                      acebmxer @acebmxer
                      last edited by acebmxer

                      Correction XCP-NG backups are Application aware... Just not accessible from the right click menu on the backup. If you click from the menu bar at top it is available...

                      Screenshot 2025-10-03 104430.png

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • R Offline
                        redneckitguy @acebmxer
                        last edited by

                        @acebmxer
                        Thanks! Hopefully they will add this... one step at a time, but nice to see XCP-ng getting more support from third parties.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post