XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    182 Posts 45 Posters 23.2k Views 37 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • paramazoP Offline
      paramazo @olivierlambert
      last edited by paramazo

      @olivierlambert I try to show it with some screenshots on same VM with the same screen

      This is XO5:
      5fdfb5e6-cf67-4e19-bf94-bcd85dddcc5b-image.jpeg

      This is XO6:
      afe0fff8-4ab1-4bed-855e-e65f2b24ff92-image.jpeg

      can you spot the difference? it seems some kind of scaling is happening here... it looks blurred. What do you think?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Online
        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        Let me ping @Team-XO-Frontend

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J Offline
          jr-m4
          last edited by

          Sometimes "# Disk Space" for VMs reports 0 in the central pane. But the assigned space is shown in the details (right) pane.

          This is the same under Pool and Host-level. Sometimes it is shown, but after a reload of the page, it resets back to 0.

          Marked the examples in red.

          61896b32-7dcc-4499-8bd5-aa9ddf5890a8-image.jpeg

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P Offline
            ph7
            last edited by ph7

            I removed 1 host from the pool and the local storage from that host didn't get purged
            Screenshot 2026-04-21 at 23-20-09 Xen Orchestra.png

            P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P Offline
              ph7 @ph7
              last edited by

              just found out that it's the same on XO5

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • escape222E Offline
                escape222
                last edited by

                Slow booting on Debian 13 VM created from a template

                I recently tried cloning a VM from a template (created from a full install of Debian 13). What was noticed was that the system takes forever to boot when the VM is created from XO-6. The issue does not happen in XO-5. The VM seems to hang at the TianoCore boot screen Hang.png.

                What I noticed is that when the VM is cloned with XO-6 the boot order somehow changes to Network boot as the first option

                BootOrder.png

                This does not happen (change of boot order) if the VM is cloned from XO-5 and there is no boot delay. The boot process seems to wait for more than 2 minutes before it fails network boot and then proceeds normally to boot from the Hard drive
                Hang2.png

                Thanks

                G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO Online
                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by

                  Thank you for the great feedback @escape222

                  Likely a bug indeed 🙂

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • G Offline
                    Greg_E @escape222
                    last edited by

                    @escape222

                    I assume you made it UEFI? I had the same problem with XO-lite about a year ago. If I created it as bios boot it worked as expected.

                    escape222E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • escape222E Offline
                      escape222 @Greg_E
                      last edited by

                      @Greg_E Yes it is UEFI

                      G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G Offline
                        Greg_E @escape222
                        last edited by

                        @escape222

                        Maybe try again as a BIOS boot VM, but the times for BIOS boot are nearing an end, so many things have climbed on UEFI only these days that a problem like this is going to be hard to ignore.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post