XenOrchestra not showing VM Disks on Pool (on single Server working) - XCP-ng Center is showing them

Pilow

@AlexD2006 see here, we're in the same boat
https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11715/vdi-not-showing-in-xo-5-from-source.

AlexD2006

Thanks for your Reply.
Just one little correction.
Also in XO6, the Disks are missing in the VM-VDI Tab.
Its exactly the same in XO5 and XO6.
Only in XCP-ng Center i see the Disks.

I noticed an additional thing.
In the Health-Dashboard, i see one orphaned "base copy" for each Disk that is adressed by this behaviour.

Exactly the amount of Disks of all my VMs with this problem.
(in the screenshot only the two of the VM of the former screenshots)
I am shure there are no orphaned VDIs, its just the base-copies of all my active Disks.

I think this could be possibly extremely dangerous, if someone has the same problem and removes the orphanes at this point.

But maybe i am too paranoid here?

acebmxer

@AlexD2006

Yes while this can be a scarry situation there have been multiple post about his. @pilow has been dealing with it the longs I believe.

Some have tried @pilow suggestion and have been good since. I would see if you can create test vm or copy one of the existing ones to try with braking a production vm.

Pilow

@AlexD2006 you are right, this is dangerous.
I also have them old & dusty base copies from the seventies

do not shoot them.

Pilow

if you have other SRs, migrating VDIs/VMs is known to correct the "visual issue"

the bug just populates a metadata of the VDI making XOA Web UI believe it's a snapshot, and it is not...

a dev told us in another thread they are on it, but it will be a two phase remediation I believe, correcting the bug so that it doesn't reproduce and a way to script out this metadata on impacted VDIs

this is only guesses

AlexD2006

@Pilow
@acebmxer

Thanx for your replies.
And sorry, i havent seen your first reply between my last posts with the link to your existing Thread.

So, i think this is some kind of a bigger thing.
Will handle with care, but i have to leave for today.
Maybe i have time to test the snapshot and revert workarounds on the weekend.
But these are all production VMs.
Have to coordinate.
I have 2 NFS-SRs in the Pool.
Will try to migrate VMs from one to the other and see if this helps.

Kind Regards and thx again
Alex

conitrade-as

Same problem here. But I noticed it only appears with the latest updates from XCP-ng 8.3. The log file shows me the following packages were updated / installed on my host:

May 07 19:44:54 Updated: xen-libs-4.17.6-6.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:54 Updated: gnutls-3.3.29-10.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:54 Updated: 1:net-snmp-libs-5.9.3-8.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:54 Updated: ipmitool-1.8.19-11.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:54 Updated: openssh-9.8p1-1.2.3.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:54 Updated: openssh-clients-9.8p1-1.2.3.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:54 Updated: openssh-server-9.8p1-1.2.3.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:54 Updated: 1:net-snmp-agent-libs-5.9.3-8.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:55 Updated: 1:net-snmp-5.9.3-8.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:55 Updated: blktap-3.55.5-6.7.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:55 Updated: message-switch-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:55 Updated: xcp-ng-xapi-plugins-1.16.0-1.xcpng8.3.noarch
May 07 19:44:55 Updated: xen-hypervisor-4.17.6-6.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:55 Updated: xen-dom0-libs-4.17.6-6.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:56 Updated: vhd-tool-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:56 Updated: squeezed-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:56 Updated: xen-tools-4.17.6-6.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:56 Updated: xen-dom0-tools-4.17.6-6.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:57 Updated: xcp-rrdd-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:57 Updated: xapi-tests-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:57 Updated: xo-lite-0.20.0-1.xcpng8.3.noarch
May 07 19:44:57 Updated: wsproxy-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:58 Updated: xapi-storage-script-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:58 Updated: xcp-networkd-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:59 Updated: forkexecd-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:59 Updated: sm-cli-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:44:59 Updated: xapi-rrd2csv-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:00 Updated: rrdd-plugins-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:01 Updated: xapi-nbd-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:01 Updated: sm-fairlock-3.2.12-17.8.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:01 Updated: sm-3.2.12-17.8.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:01 Updated: xenopsd-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:01 Updated: xenopsd-cli-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:02 Updated: xenopsd-xc-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:05 Updated: xcp-ng-pv-tools-8.3-17.xcpng8.3.noarch
May 07 19:45:05 Installed: 3:traceroute-2.1.5-2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:05 Updated: xapi-xe-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:05 Updated: qcow-stream-tool-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:08 Updated: xapi-core-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:08 Updated: xcp-ng-deps-8.3-14.noarch
May 07 19:45:08 Updated: gnutls-utils-3.3.29-10.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:08 Updated: gnutls-devel-3.3.29-10.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:09 Updated: varstored-guard-26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3.x86_64
May 07 19:45:12 Updated: kernel-4.19.19-8.0.46.2.xcpng8.3.x86_64

So I guess one of these packages could be the culprit?

conitrade-as

Another interesting observation. On a VM where we took a snapshot today (post Windows Update install) and deleted an older snapshot, the disk shows up (both v5 and v6).

conitrade-as

Dug a little deeper. For a VM where the disks are not shown the following XO API call fails:

/rest/v0/vms/a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7/vdis
{
  "error": "no such VDI ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591",
  "data": {
    "id": "ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591",
    "type": [
      "VDI"
    ]
  }
}

Also the VDI cannot be retrieved over the XO API:

/rest/v0/vms/a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7
...
 "$VBDs": [
    "4ea8a3cd-0d1b-dc60-4d9c-fd70e060f06c",
    "9f4ca686-9fc2-35a9-c3e9-c871c9f68aba"
  ],
...

/rest/v0/vbds/9f4ca686-9fc2-35a9-c3e9-c871c9f68aba
{
  "type": "VBD",
  "attached": false,
  "bootable": false,
  "device": "xvda",
  "is_cd_drive": false,
  "position": "0",
  "read_only": false,
  "VDI": "ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591",
  "VM": "a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7",
  "id": "9f4ca686-9fc2-35a9-c3e9-c871c9f68aba",
  "uuid": "9f4ca686-9fc2-35a9-c3e9-c871c9f68aba",
  "$pool": "93d361b7-f549-53b7-a3aa-c9695bf0abe4",
  "$poolId": "93d361b7-f549-53b7-a3aa-c9695bf0abe4",
  "_xapiRef": "OpaqueRef:1d424d94-f540-2eb4-9e52-2a9b21ec0a19"
}

/rest/v0/vdis/ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591
{
  "error": "no such VDI ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591",
  "data": {
    "id": "ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591",
    "type": "VDI"
  }
}

However the VDI can be listed using the xe cli:

$ xe vm-list uuid=a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7
uuid ( RO)           : a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7
     name-label ( RW): XXX
    power-state ( RO): halted

$ xe vbd-list vm-uuid=a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7
uuid ( RO)             : 4ea8a3cd-0d1b-dc60-4d9c-fd70e060f06c
          vm-uuid ( RO): a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7
    vm-name-label ( RO): XXX
         vdi-uuid ( RO): <not in database>
            empty ( RO): true
           device ( RO): xvdd


uuid ( RO)             : 9f4ca686-9fc2-35a9-c3e9-c871c9f68aba
          vm-uuid ( RO): a519e879-3971-9210-51b6-7df14336e7b7
    vm-name-label ( RO): XXX
         vdi-uuid ( RO): ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591
            empty ( RO): false
           device ( RO): xvda

$ xe vdi-list uuid=ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591
uuid ( RO)                : ac37700d-3157-4df7-b8e8-e1799a994591
          name-label ( RW): XXX Disk 0
    name-description ( RW): Created by XO
             sr-uuid ( RO): 977b7e63-bb84-57b2-3e0d-206afea553bf
        virtual-size ( RO): 34359738368
            sharable ( RO): false
           read-only ( RO): false

Seems almost like something changed in the XCP-ng API which XO cannot consume.

kagbasi-wgsdac

Another confirmed data point, with package delta and the specific malformed field.

Host: XCP-ng 8.3.0, xapi 26.1 (build 26.1.4), Xen 4.17.6-9.

Setup: XO from sources (community). All VDIs vanished from the per-VM Disks tab (XO 5 and XO 6); xe and the SR Disks tab show them fine; VMs run normally. Trigger was the 8.3 host update + reboot this morning — XO build unchanged since May 28, disks visible yesterday.

Host update delta (today): all 26.1.3-1.10 → 26.1.4-3.1 (xapi-core, xenopsd, sm-cli, sm-fairlock, xapi-storage-script, vhd-tool, message-switch, etc.), plus sm 3.2.12-17.8 → 17.9 as an independent bump.

The malformed field. An affected live OS disk (VM running):

is-a-snapshot: false
snapshot-of:   <populated, points to another VDI>
snapshot-time: <populated>

A normal base VDI should have an empty snapshot-of. After the update, snapshot-of/snapshot-time are populated on real, non-snapshot base VDIs, and XO filters anything with a non-empty snapshot-of out of the per-VM Disks view — which is the disappearance.

The VDI that snapshot-of points to is a legitimate base image in my environment (a heavily-reused Win2022 build template with a large genuine snapshot/clone lineage), so I can't tell from the host side whether the parentage links themselves changed or only the snapshot-of on live VDI labeling did. Either way, the consumer-visible effect is the same.

REST confirms: /rest/v0/vms/<uuid>/vdis → []; /rest/v0/vdis/<uuid> → "no such VDI" for the VBD's referenced UUID, while xe vdi-list shows it.

Caution for others: since live disks now carry snapshot-like metadata, be careful with Health-dashboard "orphan" cleanup and snapshot deletion on affected VMs until this is understood.

Workaround that restored the per-VM Disks view: snapshot → revert → delete-snapshot (tested on a powered-off VM, immediate).

Happy to provide more diagnostics.

Quick Follow-up:

Additional symptom, same root cause: ISO-SR VDIs are also affected. Pre-existing ISOs disappeared from the XO ISO picker (only ISOs uploaded after the patch still show). An affected ISO's vdi-param-list shows:

is-a-snapshot: false
snapshot-of:   937c3945-...   (same anchor UUID as an affected VM disk on a different SR)
snapshot-time: 19700101T00:00:00Z   (Unix epoch — clearly synthetic)

Notably the spurious snapshot-of on both an ISO VDI and an unrelated VM OS disk points to the same anchor UUID, with an epoch timestamp — so this looks like the update is stamping pre-existing VDIs with a bogus snapshot-of rather than any real lineage. VHD chains/GC are clean (GC reports no work).

Tagging a related GitHub Issue for easy correlation - https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/9578

Meninyelow created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

open VM disk with status => no item found on XOA #9578

kagbasi-wgsdac

@olivierlambert Any chance you can have someone please take a look at this thread? The issue persists and is creating problems for me. If someone out there has figured out the solution, kindly share, thanks.

olivierlambert

Hi,

I think it's a known problem, let me ping @poddingue so he gives you a quick recap on the situation (or someone from the team storage)

kagbasi-wgsdac

@olivierlambert Thanks for the response, much appreciated.

I'm getting ready to file a bug report, as I noticed this morning that this issue is now causing a VDI-IN-USE error; preventing me from starting a VM. Fortunately, that VM isn't critical, so I want to report it and help with the troubleshooting that will lead to a fix before it spreads.

poddingue

Here's the short version: this looks like the known "VDIs show up as snapshots" bug, and you haven't done anything wrong.
What happens is a metadata flag on the VDI, is-a-snapshot, gets flipped to true after some of the recent 8.3 host updates, so XO (both 5 and 6) thinks those disks are snapshots and hides them from the per-VM Disks tab, even though the VDIs are fine and xe / XCP-ng Center still show them.
A few older threads track the same thing, the main one is https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11715/vdi-not-showing-in-xo-5-from-source . From what's said there, the fix is expected in two parts: stopping it from happening again, and a way to repair the flag on VDIs that are already affected.
I don't have a timeline and could be off on the details, so please don't take that as official.
In the meantime people have made the disks reappear by migrating the affected VDI to another SR, or snapshot then revert then delete the snapshot, but it's a visual fix and can come back.
The VDI_IN_USE you're now hitting on start does sound worth its own detailed report, so yes please file it with the xapi/sm versions and that malformed is-a-snapshot field, and it'd be good to loop in @Team-Storage. Sorry you're stuck on this.

kagbasi-wgsdac

@poddingue Thanks for the response. I got side tracked with another issue and didn't get that bug report filed, I'll do that as soon as possible.

It feels like I'm playing with a hand grenade...lol, quite scary!

kagbasi-wgsdac

@poddingue Bug report filed as requested — https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/issues/825 — and tagging @Team-Storage per your suggestion.

Full evidence bundle is attached to the issue (versions, sweep output, vhd-util vs xe comparison, SMlog). Summary of what I found:

One correction to the mechanism, and I think it matters. The recap describes is-a-snapshot being flipped to true. On my system that isn't what's happening — is-a-snapshot is false on every affected VDI. The field being wrongly written is snapshot-of, which is getting populated on base disks that aren't snapshots at all. XO's disappearing-disks symptom is consistent with either (it filters on a non-empty snapshot-of), but if the storage team is hunting for a bad is-a-snapshot write, that may be the wrong field. Every affected VDI here looks like:

is-a-snapshot: false      <-- correct
snapshot-of:   <populated with an unrelated VDI's UUID>   <-- wrong

A VDI that is a snapshot of itself. The clearest single artifact:

uuid:          806f7f42-083f-4a40-b3f1-0700d00bab5a
name-label:    WinSrv2022SHB_Disk1_Data
is-a-snapshot: false
snapshot-of:   806f7f42-083f-4a40-b3f1-0700d00bab5a   <-- itself
snapshot-time: 20260709T11:19:15Z
sm-config:     vhd-parent: c86e3247-...   <-- bears no relation to the snapshot-of value

No valid code path produces snapshot-of = self. Whatever writes this field isn't validating the target.

It's still actively corrupting new VDIs — this is not just legacy damage. That self-referential VDI was created 2026-07-09, a week after my patch + reboot. Sweeps 9 days apart went from ~180 → 191 affected VDIs on one SR, and a fourth anchor UUID appeared that didn't exist in the first sweep. Newly created VHDs keep landing in the affected set. So "stop it happening again" is the urgent half of the two-part fix, at least in my case.

The bogus targets cluster onto a tiny anchor set, and the anchors point at each other:

Count	Anchor
97	`937c3945` (→ `a893fdb4`)
50	`a893fdb4` (→ `ea150883`)
37	`ea150883`
7	`806f7f42` (→ itself, new since Jul 9)

That looks less like corrupted lineage and more like the field being filled from an incorrect/uninitialised source.

On-disk VHDs are completely healthy. vhd-util check says valid, parent locators are consistent, GC reports no work. The two VDIs the DB calls parent/child are, on disk, siblings under a common parent. The corruption is purely in the XAPI database — which is good news for recoverability.

The VDI_IN_USE is not a real lock. current-operations is empty, xe task-list is empty, no tapdisk holds it. VM.start fails because it's walking a snapshot relationship that doesn't exist on disk. Reproduces from xe on the pool master with XO entirely out of the path — which is why I filed against xcp-ng/xcp rather than the XO tracker.

Versions: XCP-ng 8.3.0, xapi 26.1.11 (xapi-core-26.1.11-1.2), sm-3.2.12-17.9, sm-fairlock-3.2.12-17.9, blktap 3.55.5-9.1, build 20260618.

I have not attempted to bulk-clear the fields — on-disk data is intact and I'd rather not do a mass write against the XAPI DB on a live SR without guidance. Backing store snapshotted as a safety net.

Happy to run whatever diagnostics would help. And +1 to the hand-grenade feeling — the affected set growing on its own is the part that worries me.

kismetgerald created this issue in xcp-ng/xcp

open XAPI DB corruption: base VDIs mass-stamped with invalid `snapshot-of` (incl. a VDI that is a snapshot of itself), blocking `VM.start` with VDI_IN_USE — and still ongoing #825

XenOrchestra not showing VM Disks on Pool (on single Server working) - XCP-ng Center is showing them

Caution for others: since live disks now carry snapshot-like metadata, be careful with Health-dashboard "orphan" cleanup and snapshot deletion on affected VMs until this is understood.

open VM disk with status => no item found on XOA #9578

open XAPI DB corruption: base VDIs mass-stamped with invalid `snapshot-of` (incl. a VDI that is a snapshot of *itself*), blocking `VM.start` with VDI_IN_USE — and still ongoing #825

open XAPI DB corruption: base VDIs mass-stamped with invalid `snapshot-of` (incl. a VDI that is a snapshot of itself), blocking `VM.start` with VDI_IN_USE — and still ongoing #825