XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports

    Development
    16
    58
    5977
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ronan-aR
      ronan-a Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team ๐Ÿš€
      last edited by olivierlambert

      @swivvle You can create a ext4 SR like this:

      xe sr-create type=ext4-ng name-label=sr-test device-config:device=/dev/sda3
      

      For a basic filebased SR:

      xe sr-create type=filebased name-label=sr-test2 device-config:file-uri=/root/sr-folder
      

      Don't hesitate if you have other questions.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • AnonabharA
        Anonabhar
        last edited by

        Will it support LVMoiSCSI? Or, is that a future addition?

        ~Peg

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO
          olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
          last edited by olivierlambert

          You need to get rid of SMAPIv1 concepts ๐Ÿ˜‰ If you meant "iSCSI block" support, the answer for right now: no.

          It's a brand new approach so we'll take time to find the best one, to avoid all the mess that had SMAPIv1 on block devices (non thin, race conditions etc.)

          I think the next big "device type" support might be raw (passing a whole disk without any extra layer to the guest).

          _danielgurgel_ tjkreidlT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
          • S
            swivvle
            last edited by swivvle

            Edit: needed to do

            yum install xcp-ng-xapi-storage --enablerepo='xcp-ng-testing'
            systemctl start qemuback.service

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              swivvle
              last edited by swivvle

              @ronan-a said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

              xe sr-create type=ext4-ng name-label=sr-test device-config:device=

              I can create the SR, create the disk in the SR, but I cannot it attach it to a VM. Error is

              "Please include a URI in the device-config " Both filebased and ext4 do this for me.

              ronan-aR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • _danielgurgel_
                _danielgurgel @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert raw over iscsi?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO
                  olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                  last edited by olivierlambert

                  raw means any "whole" block device, meaning no snapshot, clone, no shared SR case, etc. Doesn't matter what's underneath. I would say the first use case is passing a whole drive to a VM (eg FreeNAS).

                  But yeah, you would be able to pass a LUN if you like ๐Ÿ™‚

                  C C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ronan-aR
                    ronan-a Vates ๐Ÿช XCP-ng Team ๐Ÿš€ @swivvle
                    last edited by ronan-a

                    @swivvle What's your exact command line? Have you restarted the toolstack?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      cocoon XCP-ng Center Team ๐Ÿš๏ธ @olivierlambert
                      last edited by

                      @olivierlambert
                      Hi, just one question to clarify:
                      does it mean I could map an untouched/unmodified LUN to a VM?
                      because I have a usecase where it is very important that the (very small) LUN is not modified as it is used as communication device between the storage system and the guest.
                      That would be great!
                      As soon as this is available I will do some testing!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO
                        olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                        last edited by

                        I think, yes.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • R
                          r1 XCP-ng Team ๐Ÿš€
                          last edited by r1

                          @Marc-pezin said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

                          yum install xcp-ng-xapi-storage

                          This needs to be # yum install xcp-ng-xapi-storage --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing

                          I tried following

                          [13:33 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# yum install xcp-ng-xapi-storage --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                          ...
                          [13:34 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# systemctl start qemuback.service
                          [13:34 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# systemctl status qemuback.service
                          โ— qemuback.service - qemuback daemon
                             Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/qemuback.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
                            Drop-In: /etc/systemd/system/qemuback.service.d
                                     โ””โ”€slice.conf
                             Active: active (running) since Sat 2019-10-05 13:34:59 IST; 5s ago
                           Main PID: 10221 (qemuback.py)
                             CGroup: /control.slice/qemuback.service
                                     โ”œโ”€10221 /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/qemuback.py
                                     โ””โ”€10222 /usr/bin/xenstore-watch /local/domain/0/backend
                          
                          [13:35 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# xe sr-create type=filebased name-label=sr-test2 device-config:file-uri=/root/sr-folder
                          c6e9c83c-78ee-7727-dec3-1c7474aef533
                          [13:36 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# ls sr-folder/
                          1  db_backups  lock_db  lock_db_backup  lock_gl  meta.json  meta.lock  sqlite3-metadata.db
                          [13:37 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# xe vbd-create vdi-uuid=cb6cf26c-b079-44e2-9466-3d61fc7ac553 vm-uuid=a00c837e-20ab-4b3b-b125-2a73df1070d2 device=5
                          6877ea3b-d3c7-e708-5b34-c5e61e5dd1eb
                          [13:37 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# xe vbd-plug uuid=6877ea3b-d3c7-e708-5b34-c5e61e5dd1eb 
                          Error code: MISSING_URI
                          Error parameters: Please include a URI in the device-config
                          
                          
                          FYI
                          [13:38 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# xe vdi-list uuid=cb6cf26c-b079-44e2-9466-3d61fc7ac553 
                          uuid ( RO)                : cb6cf26c-b079-44e2-9466-3d61fc7ac553
                                    name-label ( RW): New virtual disk (1)
                              name-description ( RW): 
                                       sr-uuid ( RO): c6e9c83c-78ee-7727-dec3-1c7474aef533
                                  virtual-size ( RO): 1073741824
                                      sharable ( RO): false
                                     read-only ( RO): false
                          

                          What can be done for Error code: MISSING_URI?

                          Edit: I did not read the restart instruction.

                          After restarting tool stack it worked and disk attached as /dev/nbd0!

                          [13:55 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# xe-toolstack-restart 
                          Executing xe-toolstack-restart
                          done.
                          [13:56 xcp-ng-8-kernel ~]# xe vbd-plug uuid=6877ea3b-d3c7-e708-5b34-c5e61e5dd1eb
                           
                          
                          Marc.pezinM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • Marc.pezinM
                            Marc.pezin Vates ๐Ÿช Sales ๐ŸŽค @r1
                            last edited by

                            @r1 You are absolutely right, I have updated the command in the initial post and in the devblog. Thanks.

                            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • R
                              r1 XCP-ng Team ๐Ÿš€ @Marc.pezin
                              last edited by

                              @Marc-pezin Thanks. I'd suggest to also add # xe-toolstack-restart so that Error code: MISSING_URI does not show up ๐Ÿ‘

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • R
                                r1 XCP-ng Team ๐Ÿš€
                                last edited by

                                @ronan-a is VDI move from SMAPIv1 to SMAPIv3 supported?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • olivierlambertO
                                  olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                                  last edited by

                                  Nope. I don't know if it's even planned by Citrix.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • C
                                    cg @olivierlambert
                                    last edited by

                                    @olivierlambert said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

                                    raw means any "whole" block device, meaning no snapshot, clone, no shared SR case, etc. Doesn't matter what's underneath. I would say the first use case is passing a whole drive to a VM (eg FreeNAS).

                                    But yeah, you would be able to pass a LUN if you like ๐Ÿ™‚

                                    Sounds a bit like VVOLs from VMware. Not sure how exactly they work but LUNs exclusively for VMs could be an easy thing, regarding TRIM/DISCARD etc.

                                    It just still needs mechanics for XAPI etc. to grab/backup them. Also Snapshots could be done with that, just a different logic.

                                    But first it's probably a target for people needing pure performance.

                                    @olivierlambert said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

                                    Nope. I don't know if it's even planned by Citrix.

                                    Noone noes if Citrix has plans at all - not even paying customers. Their communication is kind of a nightmare.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • olivierlambertO
                                      olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                                      last edited by

                                      Eager to see CH 8.1 and what they did to improve their driver to support storage live migration ๐Ÿ™‚

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • C
                                        cg @olivierlambert
                                        last edited by

                                        @olivierlambert said in SMAPIv3 - Feedback & Bug reports:

                                        Eager to see CH 8.1 and what they did to improve their driver to support storage live migration ๐Ÿ™‚

                                        Any idea about the release date? I mean their "one release a quater" only worked for very short and they failed again with 8.1, which should have been released until 1st of October.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • olivierlambertO
                                          olivierlambert Vates ๐Ÿช Co-Founder๐Ÿฆธ CEO ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ
                                          last edited by

                                          I think we can reasonably imagine for the end of the year or so ๐Ÿ™‚

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • C
                                            cg
                                            last edited by

                                            Then 8.1 should be the new LTSR. I'd appreciate that. Will XCP-ng follow that concept?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post