XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    402 Posts 47 Posters 156.9k Views 62 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • rzrR Offline
      rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Mitchel-APD
      last edited by

      @Mitchel-APD said:

      Just updated 1 pool with 3 hosts.
      SNMP did not work anymore, config file was not changed.
      Got the following error: Authorization Error (SNMP error # 16)

      Thank you for your feedback, we're going to investigate, I see that there are many changes between both versions:

      https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/compare/v5.7.2...v5.9.3

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • semarieS Offline
        semarie @Mitchel-APD
        last edited by

        @Mitchel-APD how do you auth on SNMP ? v1, v2, v3 ? and if v3, which authProtocol/privProtocol do you use ?

        Mitchel-APDM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Mitchel-APDM Offline
          Mitchel-APD @semarie
          last edited by

          @semarie Hi,

          We are using SNMPv3 with SHA AES

          semarieS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • semarieS Offline
            semarie @Mitchel-APD
            last edited by

            @Mitchel-APD SHA1 ? I am looking if it is still supported/activated-by-default. I saw that 5.8 added SHA-2 family for RFC-7860 compliance

            semarieS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • semarieS Offline
              semarie @semarie
              last edited by

              SHA`is SHA1. so I assume it is that.
              And it seems to be still accepted in authProtocol parameter.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • semarieS Offline
                semarie
                last edited by

                after testing (with net-snmp-utils 5.9.3), I have no problem with snmpv3 and SHA/AES.

                On my testing host, snmpd server (OpenBSD):

                • User: user1
                • auth: AES with password123
                • priv: AES with 321drowssap

                From XCP-ng 8.3, with net-snmp-utils 5.9.3:
                $ snmpbulkwalk -v3 -a SHA -A password123 -l authPriv -x AES -X 321drowssap -u user1 192.168.1.80

                so the net-snmp client itself seems fine with SHA/AES.

                could you share more elements ?

                Mitchel-APDM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Mitchel-APDM Offline
                  Mitchel-APD @semarie
                  last edited by Mitchel-APD

                  @semarie Hi,

                  Thanks for your help, I just created the user with the net-snmp-create-v3-user command, and definded SHA-256.

                  SNMP now works like before.

                  net-snmp-create-v3-user -ro -A verrysecureauthenticationpassword-a SHA-256 -X verrysecureprivacypassword--x AES snmpusername
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • A Offline
                    abudef
                    last edited by

                    Hi, it seems that shutting down the host is taking an extremely long time now. I tried it in two different environments; the shutdown process starts but gets stuck on the splash screen for several minutes before finally completing. There were no active virtual machines on the hosts being shut down.

                    Does anyone have the possibility to test this in a lab? Thanks!

                    gduperreyG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • gduperreyG Offline
                      gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @abudef
                      last edited by

                      @abudef I've updated and rebooted numerous hosts with these updates and haven't noticed any significant slowdowns.

                      Do you have any additional information in the logs?

                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M Offline
                        MajorP93
                        last edited by

                        Can also confirm that I was able to apply this round of patches using rolling update method without any issues or slowdowns on a pool of 5 hosts.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • A Offline
                          abudef @gduperrey
                          last edited by abudef

                          @gduperrey Restart happens normally, without any noticeable delay, but shutdown takes a long time. Which logs should I specifically check?

                          (It's not a real issue, but I just needed to move servers in the lab and had to shut them down, so I noticed it.)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          • First post
                            Last post