@BenjiReis
Thanks )
But we really have already put 8.2 from iso on it with included fixes, which we gave in another topic.
Therefore, there is no way to check now.
While it was 8.3, I managed to conduct some tests.
Did I understand something wrong or is it quite possible that in some tasks 8.3 is significantly faster on the same hardware than 8.2?
Posts made by alex821982
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 beta 🚀
-
RE: Non-server CPU compatibility - Ryzen and Intel
From this ISO, the installation went fine
I will test further... -
RE: Non-server CPU compatibility - Ryzen and Intel
Thank you, I will try to check in the coming days
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 beta 🚀
@stormi
No is not enabled. I don 't use this option on any machines at all ) -
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 beta 🚀
Copied, I get the following error when starting up
FAILED_TO_START_EMULATOR(OpaqueRef:1286de32-6c5a-4e51-b85c-794e66b4d3f7, varstored, Daemon exited unexpectedly)
-
RE: Non-server CPU compatibility - Ryzen and Intel
@olivierlambert
Hmmm...
I tried installing from this iso
https://mirrors.xcp-ng.org/isos/8.2/xcp-ng-8.2.1.iso?https=1In the end, yes, I installed 8.3 beta1
However, I lost the use of this server as part of my 8.2 pool
I thought I saw that you were planning to release 8.3 before the end of the year? -
RE: Non-server CPU compatibility - Ryzen and Intel
I will write for information.
There is a configurationMSI MEG X670E ACE
Ryzen 9 7950X
2 x 96Gb DDR5 5600MHz G.Skill Ripjaws S5
Version 8.2.1 could not be installed
When IOMMU is enabled, I get Kernel Panic at the beginning of the installation
If IOMMU is disabled, the installation begins, the initial boot takes place, then even before the first graphical installation interface and a black screen appear...
-
RE: XCP-ng 8.3 beta 🚀
Please tell me, is it true that machines from 8.3 are not copied to 8.2 ?
Copied some machines from 8.2 to 8.3, but does not copy back. -
RE: Non-server CPU compatibility - Ryzen and Intel
There is very little information on this issue
I'll ask you again more specifically hereWho used the MSI MEG X670E ACE?
Since there have already been not very good reviews on specific models for example ASUS
-
RE: Non-server CPU compatibility - Ryzen and Intel
According to the reviews above, we can conclude that the new platform on AM5 is fully supported by version 8.2 ?
-
RE: Non-server CPU compatibility - Ryzen and Intel
@tmservo433
Yes, of course, I was also not going to overclock I'm even ready to use it at a lower frequency than 6800, the main thing is that it works stably. This choice is only due to the fact that only such a kit is available to me for purchase so far.
Here is an offer available to me from ASRock
X670E Taichi Carrara -
RE: Non-server CPU compatibility - Ryzen and Intel
@tmservo433
Hmm.. interesting information, thanks...
and I was just choosing from ASUS...
Let's see what Asrock offers on AM5
If we consider the configuration with 192 Gb, then only 96Gb DDR5 6800MHz G.Skill 2 x 48 Gb KIT is available to me so far, that is, I can take two such kits, I hope there will be no problems... -
RE: Non-server CPU compatibility - Ryzen and Intel
@tmservo433
Did I understand you correctly that on X670 and 7950 you have version 8.2 running from open access with the latest updates?
And no problems have been noticed in the work?
And according to the memory configuration, did you just say that there is an option with 96+96 or do you use it in your configurations too?
And can I ask what specific models of motherboards and memory you use for this configuration? -
RE: Non-server CPU compatibility - Ryzen and Intel
@tmservo433
Hmm.. I don't see 48 GB modules on sale, only 2x24
Maybe you had the opportunity to compare the performance with the 5900X ? -
RE: Non-server CPU compatibility - Ryzen and Intel
@stormi How soon can this be expected?
We planned to purchase a server on this hardware and include it in our 8.2 pool for work tasks.
But so far, the purchase has been suspended until the situation is clarified.