Global Moderators

Forum wide moderators

Posts

  • RE: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    @rzr said:

    As this is my first time installing these update candidates,

    Actually we moved first batch of packages that landed in testing to candidates repo, to avoid mix up in the second batch that just landed in testing repo. Since nothing new appeared in candidate you should probably already had them before, home this is clarifying what is actually happening 🙂

    Next yum update should just pull the latest stable versions?

    Not if you already have installed then from testing (or candidate) repo, because versions are same, it's only the distribution channel that change, no impact for testers.

    I'm not sure what you understood from @scarfantennae's question, but that we moved packages from xcp-ng-testing to xcp-ng-candidates doesn't seem on topic here.

    The question is: "now that I've applied this update candidates from the testing repositories, am I definitively in testing mode?".

    The answer is: no, because:

    • The --enable-repo switch only applies to the two commands you ran: clearing the cache and applying updates. The repositories remain disabled by default, so yes, next time you update you'll only get stable updates if there are any.
    • Either the exact packages that you installed will be pushed as official updates (in which case there will be nothing for you to do), or we'll push newer updates that will supersede them automatically next time you update.

    Hope it's clear.

  • RE: XO Lite - network management "coming soon"

    We prioritized Network creation in Xen Orchestra as they are mostly Pool-level objects (supposedly with multiple hosts), but we will rework on XO-Lite soon, so you could perform all basic actions as well from XO-Lite.

  • RE: unacceptable message conflict

    @skipthompson81 said:

    this CONFLICT is not OK!

    You will need to provide more details about this specific backup job. It's possible that the backup succeeded, but then the subsequent Health Check failed or timed out. Have you tried downloading and examining the full log from the failed backup?

    65a4470c-0b71-474b-b506-1512e1fbbf45-image.jpeg

  • RE: Adding new host to pool fails - Stunnel SSL certiticate verification failure

    @Bryanvh No problem 🙂

    The issue you encountered wasn't very clear. Therefore, I've proposed a change to the XAPI to make the error more explicit (this will likely be implemented in future XAPI releases).

    So instead of SSL Certification failure the message will be: POOL_JOINING_MASTER_CERTIFICATE_NOT_IN_POOL_BUNDLE.

    Thank you very much for your patience and for bringing this issue to our attention.

    References:
    https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api/pull/7112