Global Moderators group | XCP-ng and XO forum

stormi

CCing @Team-XAPI-Network and @Team-Hypervisor-Kernel for them to have a look at this strong vs weak host model and the impact on HA.

stormi

@pandusen said:
its scary that GPU passthrough still has a low priority for XCP-ng, during the boom of AI and local LLM Inferencing.

As XCP-ng product owner, and someone who sees how much work developers put into such topics, may I ask you to elaborate on this "has low priority" statement?

ronan-a

@KB973 Hello, thanks for the details. Regarding migration we are aware of issues in the lock system to resume a VM after migration. Often a lock is locked by SR.scan. We can't easily patch in V1.

Also do you have the same issues using a default MTU (1500)?

julienXOvates

@jacob.becker said:

Hi!
In XO-5 you can see clearly if a host is in maintenace mode" or not. I'm missing a similar thing to the little green/gray dot from XO-5 in the XO6 treeview.
You can see it in the System- Tab under General Information, but only if the host is already selected.

I personally find it difficult to distinct between hosts and VMs in the treeview if a large amount entries are shown. Especially while scrolling.

Hi @jacob.becker, this is going to be fixed in XO 6.9 (ie. the Disable state for a host).
I share your point of view about hosts & VM icons, we should also change them.
Thanks !

julienXOvates

@erwi_2026 I'm not expert on the Networking side so I may be wrong.
I believe this is the expected behavior : the slave interfaces will show as disconnected because only the bonds containing these interfaces should be used.
You may see the difference between the PIF status and Physical interface status in XO6 > Host > Network > PIF details (right side panel) for your bond.

Danp

I've confirmed the discrepancy when health checks are performed. Let's see what @Team-XO-Backend has to say about this.

Danp

For those of you that are observing a difference in the reported transfer size between XO5 and XO6, can you please let us know if the affected backup jobs are performing health checks?

Danp

I'm not seeing this discrepancy on either XOA 6.8.2 or XO from sources (commit a1dba). Does it occur with all backup jobs or only some of them?

Also, I'm not sure that I understood your reference to the side panel. Are you not able to view it in XO6?

Edit: Just saw your comment regarding health checks. This is certainly something to investigate.

Danp

@probain I assume that you are running XO from sources. What is your current commit? Have you tried updating to the latest source?

Global Moderators

Posts

Member List