XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    142 Posts 26 Posters 8.7k Views 40 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
      last edited by stormi

      Yes update candidates that were not urgent security fixes are still in the xcp-ng-testing repository (and more is coming soon, today or on
      monday).

      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P Offline
        ph7 @stormi
        last edited by

        @stormi
        I ran the xcp-ng-testing and now the migration seems to work

        25871203-4dbe-4e92-ba30-60efb2bf903d-image.png

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
          last edited by

          New update update candidates for you to test!

          Unless major issues are found, this should be the last wave of update candidates before we publish everything as official updates for XCP-ng 8.3.

          • cifs-utils: update and rebuild based on the sources for the RHEL9 package. This fixes several low priority CVEs (in the context of XCP-ng) and will make future vulnerability patching easier.
          • curl: update to version 8.9.1, based on RHEL 10 package, and apply an additional fix for CVE-2024-8096 (low impact in XCP-ng context).
          • intel-e1000e: major driver update, backported from Linux kernel 5.10.179, to fix issues with recent hardware.
          • kernel: Fix support of dynamic tracepoints when debugging the dom0 Linux kernel with the perf tool
          • ncurses: Revert -devel package ABI to version 5 to avoid potential library conflicts in packages built against it
          • openssh: rebuild against updated ncurses package
          • python3-docutils: new dependency of cifs-utils
          • samba:
            • Fix CVE-2016-2124, a flaw on SMB1 auth. An attacker could retrieve the password by using NT1.
            • Fix CVE-2021-44142, an out-of-bounds heap read write vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by using VFS_fruit module.
          • systemtap: rebuild against updated ncurses package
          • xapi: Remove pvsproxy.service from the list of units restarted on xcp-rrdd update. The service in question attempts to start a proprietary component from XenServer that isn't present in XCP-ng, which led to displaying a not so pretty error in the logs.
          • xcp-ng-release: Enable missing xcp-rrdd plugins by default. Yes, failure to do so was what caused the empty stats issue you have been seeing in previous update candidates.
          • xen: rebuild against updated ncurses package
          • xo-lite: Update to 0.10.1.

          Test on XCP-ng 8.3

          From an up-to-date host:

          yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
          yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
          reboot
          

          The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

          Versions

          • cifs-utils: 7.1-2.1
          • curl: 8.9.1-5.1.xcpng8.3
          • intel-e1000e: 5.10.179-1.xcpng8.3
          • kernel: 4.19.19-8.0.38.2.xcpng8.3
          • ncurses: 6.4-6.20240309.xcpng8.3
          • openssh: 7.4p1-23.3.3.xcpng8.3
          • python3-docutils: 0.14-1.el7
          • samba: 4.10.16-25.1.xcpng8.3
          • systemtap: 4.0-5.2.xcpng8.3
          • xapi: 25.6.0-1.5.xcpng8.3
          • xcp-ng-release: 8.3.0-32
          • xen: 4.17.5-10.1.xcpng8.3
          • xo-lite: 0.10.1-1.xcpng8.3

          What to test

          Normal use and anything else you want to test. The closer to your actual use of XCP-ng, the better.

          Special focus:

          • We updated the e1000e driver. If you have Intel PCI-Express network chipsets, please test this update and verify that network connectivity and features that you depend on work as expected.
          • SMB shares and SRs.
          • yum still appearing to work correctly after the update.
          • SSH connection to hosts.
          • Stats. But I'm sure that's the first thing several among you will test already.

          Test window before official release of the updates

          Around one week, unless major issues are found.

          F A P 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • F Offline
            flakpyro @stormi
            last edited by

            @stormi Updated both of my test hosts.

            Machine 1:
            Intel Xeon E-2336
            SuperMicro board.

            Machine 2:
            Minisforum MS-01
            i9-13900H
            32 GB Ram
            Using Intel X710 onboard NIC

            Everything rebooted and came up fine. The MS-01 i test with uses i40e and intel-igc not the e1000 driver. The other machine with the SuperMicro board uses igb so im afraid i'm not much help in testing that driver.

            yum commands did seem to work from the small handful i ran.

            And yes, stats do indeed work again 🙂

            I never noticed the issue with Server 2025 and hanging on reboot since the updates from last week. Were you able to see anything in the dump files i sent?

            G stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • G Offline
              Greg_E @flakpyro
              last edited by

              @flakpyro

              Off topic, how does XCP handle the E and P cores in that 13900 machine? That was one of the considerations that made me skip these Intel processors in favor of AMD.

              I'll get mine updated as soon as possible, on going work to clean out my tech room so it can get cut in half for class space. Goodbye future expansion if we need it!

              F olivierlambertO 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Offline
                Andrew Top contributor @stormi
                last edited by

                @stormi Minor issue: e1000e does not show driver version with ethtool:

                # ethtool -i eth0
                driver: e1000e
                version:
                firmware-version: 0.1-4
                expansion-rom-version:
                bus-info: 0000:00:1f.6
                supports-statistics: yes
                supports-test: yes
                supports-eeprom-access: yes
                supports-register-dump: yes
                supports-priv-flags: yes
                
                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • F Offline
                  flakpyro @Greg_E
                  last edited by

                  @Greg_E It seems to handle it fine, i have 2 of these systems running without issue with 8.3!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @flakpyro
                    last edited by

                    @flakpyro No, I'm waiting for more feedback from the devs. All I have from them for now is it looks like either a firmware or a passthrough issue. I don't think we have changed anything to fix it.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormiS Offline
                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Andrew
                      last edited by stormi

                      @Andrew Thanks for noticing that. CC @ThierryEscande

                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A Offline
                        Andrew Top contributor @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi @ThierryEscande I issued a PR for intel-e1000e to add the version for ethtool.

                        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • P Offline
                          ph7 @stormi
                          last edited by ph7

                          @stormi
                          My old i7 with e1000e is working fine (except the version not shoving)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO @Greg_E
                            last edited by

                            @Greg_E It works but it's not designed to work. I'm personally use a system like this at home (Protectli) and no issues so far after a rather intensive use.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stormiS Offline
                              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Andrew
                              last edited by

                              @Andrew What does a regular linux distro output as a version for the driver? I've been told there's no version in the source code, so does it output anything?

                              B A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B Offline
                                blankOutreach @stormi
                                last edited by

                                @stormi It shows the kernel version, exactly what uname -r would.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A Offline
                                  Andrew Top contributor @stormi
                                  last edited by

                                  @stormi From Debian 11:

                                  # ethtool -i enp0s25
                                  driver: e1000e
                                  version: 5.10.0-34-amd64
                                  firmware-version: 0.2-4
                                  expansion-rom-version:
                                  bus-info: 0000:00:19.0
                                  supports-statistics: yes
                                  supports-test: yes
                                  supports-eeprom-access: yes
                                  supports-register-dump: yes
                                  supports-priv-flags: yes
                                  
                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • B Offline
                                    bufanda
                                    last edited by

                                    Updated my Lab pool consisting of 2 Nodes this morning
                                    Rebooted master first, then slave. No issues VMs migrated between reboots.
                                    Couldn't see any issue til now.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                      last edited by

                                      Updates done on 1x Intel and 1x AMD host, rebooted, no visible issues.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • First post
                                        Last post