XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    189 Posts 31 Posters 19.3k Views 43 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Andrew
      last edited by stormi

      @Andrew Thanks for noticing that. CC @ThierryEscande

      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A Offline
        Andrew Top contributor @stormi
        last edited by

        @stormi @ThierryEscande I issued a PR for intel-e1000e to add the version for ethtool.

        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • P Offline
          ph7 @stormi
          last edited by ph7

          @stormi
          My old i7 with e1000e is working fine (except the version not shoving)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO @Greg_E
            last edited by

            @Greg_E It works but it's not designed to work. I'm personally use a system like this at home (Protectli) and no issues so far after a rather intensive use.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Andrew
              last edited by

              @Andrew What does a regular linux distro output as a version for the driver? I've been told there's no version in the source code, so does it output anything?

              B A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B Offline
                blankOutreach @stormi
                last edited by

                @stormi It shows the kernel version, exactly what uname -r would.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • A Offline
                  Andrew Top contributor @stormi
                  last edited by

                  @stormi From Debian 11:

                  # ethtool -i enp0s25
                  driver: e1000e
                  version: 5.10.0-34-amd64
                  firmware-version: 0.2-4
                  expansion-rom-version:
                  bus-info: 0000:00:19.0
                  supports-statistics: yes
                  supports-test: yes
                  supports-eeprom-access: yes
                  supports-register-dump: yes
                  supports-priv-flags: yes
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • B Offline
                    bufanda
                    last edited by

                    Updated my Lab pool consisting of 2 Nodes this morning
                    Rebooted master first, then slave. No issues VMs migrated between reboots.
                    Couldn't see any issue til now.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      Updates done on 1x Intel and 1x AMD host, rebooted, no visible issues.

                      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • T Offline
                        ThierryEscande Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @olivierlambert
                        last edited by

                        Hi @Andrew, @ph7, @blankOutreach and others

                        A new release of the Intel e1000e driver is available for testing. It's a minor release that fixes the driver version reported by ethtool, no other change. Please test this update and verify that network connectivity and features that you depend on work as expected.

                        P A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • P Offline
                          ph7 @ThierryEscande
                          last edited by

                          @ThierryEscande
                          Ran some tests for 20 min
                          Seems to work fine

                          [18:39 x1 ~]# ethtool -i eth0
                          driver: e1000e
                          version: 5.10.179
                          firmware-version: 0.13-3
                          expansion-rom-version: 
                          bus-info: 0000:00:19.0
                          supports-statistics: yes
                          supports-test: yes
                          supports-eeprom-access: yes
                          supports-register-dump: yes
                          supports-priv-flags: yes
                          
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • A Offline
                            Andrew Top contributor @ThierryEscande
                            last edited by

                            @ThierryEscande I ran the update and it's passing good data (on an older card that worked before).

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • G Offline
                              Greg_E
                              last edited by

                              I finally got my lab updated and the two vms started, so far so good. Stats data is present, the first time I've seen any of my hosts pull 100% CPU. Hosts are little HP T740 thin clients with AMD V1756B processors and 64GB of ram, in a 3 host pool.

                              Sorry I can't bring more detail, not really doing work on my XCP lab right now, and lots of shake up around tech. space at work.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by stormi

                                So, we owe a very big thank you to everyone here for your tests and feedback. The numerous updates that were in the xcp-ng-testing repository are now officially published to everyone:

                                https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2025/05/26/may-2025-maintenance-update-for-xcp-ng-8-3/

                                But stay with us, as very soon we'll have a few more updates to test, as well as refreshed installation ISOs!

                                F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • F Offline
                                  flakpyro @stormi
                                  last edited by

                                  @stormi Installed on our 2 production pools, DR and remote sites, 46 hosts total ranging from Dell, Lenovo, HP, and Supermicro servers, no issues to report!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                                  • stormiS Offline
                                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                    last edited by

                                    Just a heads-up to let you know that we'll soon (tonight? Tomorrow?) upload pre-releases of the refreshed installation ISOs for XCP-ng 8.3.

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • B Offline
                                      bufanda @stormi
                                      last edited by

                                      @stormi Oh Damn, bad timing I shouldn't have updated my 8.2 pool last sunday 😄

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • stormiS Offline
                                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                        last edited by stormi

                                        A few days late because internal tests led to a few fixes, here are the pre-release ISO images for a refreshed XCP-ng 8.3 installer:

                                        https://repo.vates.tech/tmp/

                                        $ cat SHA256SUMS
                                        22deae59e7c5cff7d4691c447af9dbf27b29a372748c1844c280bdc212ef2a5f  xcp-ng-8.3-20250606-linstor-upgradeonly.pre3.iso
                                        9a5dcc8d98949ee207d28307b8b94320d1ffd24841e34ca74e1c0f0422e5ecab  xcp-ng-8.3-20250606-netinstall.pre3.iso
                                        4d6f5a99da0d70920bc313470ad2b14decab66038f0863ca68a2b81126ee2977  xcp-ng-8.3-20250606.pre3.iso
                                        
                                        1. No need to upgrade XCP-ng 8.3 with these. It is not a new release. It's refreshed installation images, with all updates included.
                                        2. When we release them, at the same time, XCP-ng 8.3 will be officially labeled LTS. Again, the existing XCP-ng 8.3 that you already use. Not a new XCP-ng release.
                                        3. This is also when XOSTOR becomes officially supported in XCP-ng 8.3 🎉.
                                        4. 8.2 to 8.3 upgrade with XOSTOR required a specific treatment, to get a compatible LINSTOR version installed on upgrade. This constraint we had to handle was caused by Linstor not supporting rolling upgrade. For this, we provide a dedicated upgrade ISO (-linstor-upgradeonly). After the upgrade, if there are available updates in 8.3 for linstor, then you can follow the usual update process (which also contains specific steps for XOSTOR such as updating linstor-satellite first on all hosts and restarting the services on all of them, still due to linstor not supporting rolling update. That's something that XOA's RPU handles automatically since a few releases, by the way).
                                        5. Some packages are slightly newer in the ISOs than in 8.3's update repositories. The only reason is because I didn't want to push updates so soon right after the previous batch, so that XOA doesn't tell you that you are outdated and need to update. But of course these updates will also come to existing XCP-ng 8.3 hosts soon. They're not just for the ISOs.
                                        6. The netinstall ISO image will pull the original 8.3.0 packages at the moment, so if you want to use it you first need to create a netinstall reposistory somewhere by extracting the full installation ISO, and point at it.

                                        Regarding testing we are interested on all kind of feedback. Installations, upgrades with and without XOSTOR, and everything you want to test that seems pertinent to ensure there are no regressions when compared to the original 8.3.0 installation ISOs.

                                        G G stormiS 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                        • G Online
                                          gb.123 @stormi
                                          last edited by gb.123

                                          @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing:

                                          A few days late because internal tests led to a few fixes, here are the pre-release ISO images for a refreshed XCP-ng 8.3 installer:

                                          https://repo.vates.tech/tmp/

                                          $ cat SHA256SUMS
                                          22deae59e7c5cff7d4691c447af9dbf27b29a372748c1844c280bdc212ef2a5f  xcp-ng-8.3-20250606-linstor-upgradeonly.pre3.iso
                                          9a5dcc8d98949ee207d28307b8b94320d1ffd24841e34ca74e1c0f0422e5ecab  xcp-ng-8.3-20250606-netinstall.pre3.iso
                                          4d6f5a99da0d70920bc313470ad2b14decab66038f0863ca68a2b81126ee2977  xcp-ng-8.3-20250606.pre3.iso
                                          
                                          1. No need to upgrade XCP-ng 8.3 with these. It is not a new release. It's refreshed installation images, with all updates included.
                                          2. When we release them, at the same time, XCP-ng 8.3 will be officially labeled LTS. Again, the existing XCP-ng 8.3 that you already use. Not a new XCP-ng release.
                                          3. This is also when XOSTOR becomes officially supported in XCP-ng 8.3 🎉.

                                          This is definitely the best part... I just installed XCP-NG on my test bench (a few days back) with the previous ISOs to test the updates !
                                          Will try this ISO as soon as I get my new PC!
                                          Was eagerly waiting to try XOSTOR in the meantime. 🙂

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • G Offline
                                            Greg_E @stormi
                                            last edited by

                                            @stormi

                                            With 8.3 becoming LTS, what happens to 8.2.x? How long will it still receive security updates?

                                            Trying to decide if this is a drop everything and upgrade moment, or if there is some time available before upgrading is required. While my 8.3 lab has been solid since switching (disregarding user created problems), I'm not sure I want to go through an 8.2 to 8.3 upgrade right now.

                                            Also with 8.3 going LTS, does this mean that a 9.x Beta will be available soon? It looks like Alma just released v10 which I've read is going to be the basis for XCP-ng 9.x, or is this still a mountain of work to overcome to get to a Beta? The newer kernel functions like the NFS options is something I'm looking forward to testing.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post