XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    256 Posts 33 Posters 88.0k Views 49 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F Offline
      flakpyro @stormi
      last edited by flakpyro

      @stormi Installed on my usual test hosts (Intel Minisforum MS-01, and Supermicro running a Xeon E-2336 CPU). Also installed onto a 2 host AMD epyc pool. Updates went smooth, backups continue to function as before.

      3 windows 11 VMs had secure boot enabled. In XOA i clicked "Copy pool's default UEFI certificates to the VM" after the update was complete. The VMs continued to boot without issue after.

      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • A Offline
        Andrew Top contributor @stormi
        last edited by

        @stormi Running.... but...

        #  secureboot-certs install
        Traceback (most recent call last):
          File "/usr/sbin/secureboot-certs", line 770, in <module>
            install(session, args)
          File "/usr/sbin/secureboot-certs", line 313, in install
            validate_args(args)
          File "/usr/sbin/secureboot-certs", line 288, in validate_args
            if os.path.exists(args.PK) and not is_auth(args.PK) and not getattr(args, "pk_priv", False):
          File "/usr/sbin/secureboot-certs", line 381, in is_auth
            with open(path, "rb") as f:
        IOError: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 'default'
        

        Also, can this update also include the fixvwc qemu Windows crash fix?

        D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • D Offline
          dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Andrew
          last edited by

          @Andrew Looks like there's something named "default" in your current directory that's confusing the script. Try changing to another directory before running the command.

          The VWC fix won't be part of this update wave, but will hopefully arrive soon.

          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Offline
            Andrew Top contributor @dinhngtu
            last edited by

            @dinhngtu Correct! I was in /etc/ which has a default directory.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B Offline
              bufanda @stormi
              last edited by

              @stormi Installed on two node Pool. Both nodes are HP EliteDesk 800 G3 Miini. 10 Linux VMs with Secure Boot enabled and 1 Windows Server 2019 with SecureBoot and vTPM enabled. No issues. Migration between nodes worked flawlessly too.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • stormiS Offline
                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @flakpyro
                last edited by

                @flakpyro said in XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing:

                @stormi Installed on my usual test hosts (Intel Minisforum MS-01, and Supermicro running a Xeon E-2336 CPU). Also installed onto a 2 host AMD epyc pool. Updates went smooth, backups continue to function as before.

                3 windows 11 VMs had secure boot enabled. In XOA i clicked "Copy pool's default UEFI certificates to the VM" after the update was complete. The VMs continued to boot without issue after.

                If you want to go further with the test, you need to clear your pool's secure boot certificates (the ones you probably had installed in the past from XO to "set up the pool for Guest SB"), so that the new pool defaults become the ones we provided with the update.

                Then you can try again propagating the certs to the VMs.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • gskgerG Offline
                  gskger Top contributor @stormi
                  last edited by

                  @stormi Update two pools with a total of six host (HP ProDesk 600 G6 and Dell Optiplex 9010) and two Dell R720 with GPUs. Update went smooth and no issues running for two days now (with backup and restore)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • A Offline
                    Andrew Top contributor @stormi
                    last edited by

                    @stormi After pool update, XO Continuous Replication times dropped by 50%. Before, the hourly CR took about 14-15 minutes, after the update it takes about 7-8 minutes now. Most of the CR time is spent on setup of the VM for transfer, not the actual data transfer bandwidth. Normal delta backup times did not change (data transfer limited). No change/update in XO/hardware/network, just this XCP update.

                    stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormiS Offline
                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Andrew
                      last edited by

                      @Andrew Nice. What kind of SR?

                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        I can assume LVM based SR with a reasonable number of VDI, so metadata operation (mounting the VDI) took a lot of time.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A Offline
                          Andrew Top contributor @stormi
                          last edited by

                          @stormi Pool source SR is NFS. Destination has local EXT4. It's only around 70 VMs.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            🤔 Then IDK why it's a lot faster 🤔

                            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stormiS Offline
                              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @olivierlambert
                              last edited by

                              @olivierlambert LVM also plays a role with such SRs, maybe that's it. Or it's another optimization. XAPI had some too.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post