XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
-
@Andrew Looks like there's something named "default" in your current directory that's confusing the script. Try changing to another directory before running the command.
The VWC fix won't be part of this update wave, but will hopefully arrive soon.
-
@dinhngtu Correct! I was in
/etc/which has adefaultdirectory. -
@stormi Installed on two node Pool. Both nodes are HP EliteDesk 800 G3 Miini. 10 Linux VMs with Secure Boot enabled and 1 Windows Server 2019 with SecureBoot and vTPM enabled. No issues. Migration between nodes worked flawlessly too.
-
@flakpyro said in XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing:
@stormi Installed on my usual test hosts (Intel Minisforum MS-01, and Supermicro running a Xeon E-2336 CPU). Also installed onto a 2 host AMD epyc pool. Updates went smooth, backups continue to function as before.
3 windows 11 VMs had secure boot enabled. In XOA i clicked "Copy pool's default UEFI certificates to the VM" after the update was complete. The VMs continued to boot without issue after.
If you want to go further with the test, you need to clear your pool's secure boot certificates (the ones you probably had installed in the past from XO to "set up the pool for Guest SB"), so that the new pool defaults become the ones we provided with the update.
Then you can try again propagating the certs to the VMs.
-
@stormi Update two pools with a total of six host (HP ProDesk 600 G6 and Dell Optiplex 9010) and two Dell R720 with GPUs. Update went smooth and no issues running for two days now (with backup and restore)
-
@stormi After pool update, XO Continuous Replication times dropped by 50%. Before, the hourly CR took about 14-15 minutes, after the update it takes about 7-8 minutes now. Most of the CR time is spent on setup of the VM for transfer, not the actual data transfer bandwidth. Normal delta backup times did not change (data transfer limited). No change/update in XO/hardware/network, just this XCP update.
-
@Andrew Nice. What kind of SR?
-
I can assume LVM based SR with a reasonable number of VDI, so metadata operation (mounting the VDI) took a lot of time.
-
@stormi Pool source SR is NFS. Destination has local EXT4. It's only around 70 VMs.
-
Then IDK why it's a lot faster -
@olivierlambert LVM also plays a role with such SRs, maybe that's it. Or it's another optimization. XAPI had some too.
