XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    News
    43
    264
    94.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      cocoon XCP-ng Center Team @stormi
      last edited by

      @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀:

      @cocoon Did you enable Secure Boot on the VM, and did you also install SecureBoot certificates on your pool? (and if you installed the certificates to the pool after you first started the VM - with or without SB, you also need to install them to the VM by putting it in user mode: varstore-sb-state user {VM-UUID}).

      Ah yes, thanks, that works 👍
      the command is just slightly different:

      varstore-sb-state {VM-UUID} user

      2023-01-16_secureboot-001_fixed.png

      2023-01-16_secureboot-002_fixed.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • stormiS
        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        If you want to push the vTPM test further, you can activate bitlocker in a Windows VM and see if after a reboot the drives are decrypted without having to enter passcodes manually.

        C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • C
          cocoon XCP-ng Center Team @stormi
          last edited by cocoon

          @stormi That was my plan, Bitlocker feature is already installed, will test this yes 😉

          2023-01-16_bitlocker-001.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stormiS
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by stormi

            Small Announcement / Testing Guide

            There is a new and easy way for you to help testing XCP-ng 8.3: a few test scripts from the Xen project which deserve to be run on a wide variety of hosts. You don't need to run them on every host if they are truly identical, but it's good to run them on a wide range of hardware.

            The first one is XTF (stands for Xen Test Framework)

            Be aware that some of the tests may sometimes cause the host to crash.

            XTF

            Enable HVM FEP on the host. This is not mandatory but if you don't, several tests that require it will be skipped:

            /opt/xensource/libexec/xen-cmdline --set-xen hvm_fep
reboot

            Build XTF

            yum install gcc git -y
git clone git://xenbits.xen.org/xtf.git
cd xtf
make -j8

            (Optional, protects your host from a crash if its hardware is vulnerable to XSA-304) Switch EPT superpages to secure mode:

            xl set-parameters ept=no-exec-sp

            Run the tests

            # self test
./xtf-runner selftest -q --host
# all tests
# -q stands for quiet. Remove one or both if you want to see details.
./xtf-runner -aqq --host
# check return code. Should be "3" which means "no failures but some tests were skipped":
echo $?

            Switch back EPT superpages to fast mode, if needed

            xl set-parameters ept=exec-sp

            There will be a few SKIPPED tests, but there shouldn't be many.

            Known skipped tests:

            • test-hvm32-umip test-hvm64-umip: skipped if the CPU is not recent enough to support UMIP.
            • test-pv64-xsa-167: always skipped
            • test-pv64-xsa-182: skipped in default configuration.

            You can ignore them.

            xen-dom0-tests

            The testsuite is very limited in Xen 4.13, but let's still run what's available.

            Install:

            yum install xen-dom0-tests

            Run

            /usr/libexec/xen/bin/test-cpu-policy
# check return code. Must be 0, otherwise this means there was a failure.
echo $?
            gskgerG stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • gskgerG
              gskger Top contributor
              last edited by gskger

              @stormi I am afraid my playlab host (Dell Optiplex 9010, Intel i5-3550 CPU) is to old to contribute to the XCP-ng 8.3 alpha testing, but I run the XTF test with this results:

              [h01]# ./xtf-runner selftest -q --host
Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

              followed by

              [h01]# ./xtf-runner -aqq --host
Combined test results:
test-hvm32-umip                          SKIP
test-hvm64-umip                          SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
[h01]# echo $?
3
[h01]#

              I have some HP Elitedesk 600 G6 mini coming in to test as a small virtualization lab (i5-10500T, 6 cores, 12 threads, 2.3 GHz base clock, 64GB RAM). Not the target infrastructure but will add to the range of hardware.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • ForzaF
                Forza @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert said in XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀:

                It's an alpha not because it's unstable 😉 Just that we can make some updates before the official release. Happy to see it works well!

                A thought. Is there a planned list of stuff that we can vote on to have on the next release?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO
                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by

                  Hi,

                  No/not yet/our backlog is already too full to make many choices for something that should be out in a matter of months.

                  I mean, changing a color somewhere is OK, but anything else is not in the realm of possible for now.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • gskgerG
                    gskger Top contributor @stormi
                    last edited by gskger

                    @stormi My first HP Elitedesk 600 G6 Mini arrived (i5-10500T, 6 cores, 12 threads, 2.3 GHz base clock, 64GB RAM, 256GB NVME) and XCP-ng 8.3 alpha installed and updated right away (but I have the efi: EFI_MEMMAP not enabled message with a boot delay).

                    The XTF test on this non-enterprise hardware returns

                    [M01]# ./xtf-runner selftest -q --host
Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

                    and

                    [M01]# ./xtf-runner -aqq --host
Combined test results:
test-hvm32-umip                          SKIP
test-hvm64-umip                          SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
[M01]# echo $?
3
[M01]#

                    Have not done anything else with this unit yet.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • S
                      Strebor
                      last edited by

                      Sorry for being very late to this show, but I would like to thank everybody involved in getting XCP-ng ready for using on modern 10th and 11th gen Intel NUCs! Great job!

                      So, to replace (in the near future) the old and large power guzzling lab servers in my office, I've just ordered 2x Intel NUC 11 with i5-1135G7 CPU and the intel 2.5 gbit I225 NIC.

                      Looking forward to testing them and getting ready for XCP-ng 8.3!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                      • A
                        Andrew Top contributor @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi I have 8.3 alpha+updates running on an HP DL360 G8 and it's working as expected since currently it's mostly an update to 8.2... I did an ISO install/update and it went ok. I did have to re-install some packages that were installed before on 8.2 and fix options that were removed during the 8.3 install but it keep most of XCP/Network/VM config.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • stormiS
                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @stormi
                          last edited by

                          @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀:

                          Small Announcement / Testing Guide

                          There is a new and easy way for you to help testing XCP-ng 8.3: a few test scripts from the Xen project which deserve to be run on a wide variety of hosts. You don't need to run them on every host if they are truly identical, but it's good to run them on a wide range of hardware.

                          The first one is XTF (stands for Xen Test Framework)

                          XTF

                          Enable HVM FEP on the host. This is not mandatory but if you don't, several tests that require it will be skipped:

                          /opt/xensource/libexec/xen-cmdline --set-xen hvm_fep
reboot

                          Build XTF

                          yum install gcc git -y
git clone git://xenbits.xen.org/xtf.git
cd xtf
make -j8

                          Run the tests

                          # self test
./xtf-runner selftest -q --host
# all tests
# -q stands for quiet. Remove one or both if you want to see details.
./xtf-runner -aqq --host
# check return code. Should be "3" which means "no failures but some tests were skipped":
echo $?

                          There will be a few SKIPPED tests, but there shouldn't be many.

                          Known skipped tests:

                          • test-hvm32-umip test-hvm64-umip: skipped if the CPU is not recent enough to support UMIP.
                          • test-pv64-xsa-167: always skipped
                          • test-pv64-xsa-182: skipped in default configuration.

                          You can ignore them.

                          xen-dom0-tests

                          The testsuite is very limited in Xen 4.13, but let's still run what's available.

                          Install:

                          yum install xen-dom0-tests

                          Run

                          /usr/libexec/xen/bin/test-cpu-policy
# check return code. Must be 0, otherwise this means there was a failure.
echo $?

                          I'm still interested in as many users as possible running this on their hardware.

                          jhansenJ J A gskgerG 9 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • jhansenJ
                            jhansen @stormi
                            last edited by olivierlambert

                            @stormi
                            Hello, here the results on my server:

                            Test server:
Dell Poweredge R730
2 x Xenon E5-2698v4
512GB RAM

./xtf-runner selftest -q --host
Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

./xtf-runner -aqq --host
Combined test results:
test-hvm32-umip                          SKIP
test-hvm64-umip                          SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
Echo Result 3

/usr/libexec/xen/bin/test-cpu-policy
CPU Policy unit tests
Testing CPU vendor identification:
Testing CPUID serialise success:
Testing CPUID deserialise failure:
Testing CPUID out-of-range clearing:
Testing MSR serialise success:
Testing MSR deserialise failure:
Testing policy compatibility success:
Testing policy compatibility failure:
Done: all ok
Echo Result 0
                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • J
                              JeffBerntsen Top contributor @stormi
                              last edited by

                              @stormi

                              Here's the results from one of my test lab servers:

                              Test server: HP MicroServer
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II Neo N36L
RAM: 8GB

xtf-runner selftest -q --host

Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

xtf-runner -aqq --host

Combined test results:
test-pv64-cpuid-faulting                 SKIP
test-pv64-pv-fsgsbase                    SKIP
test-hvm32-umip                          SKIP
test-hvm64-umip                          SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP

/usr/libexec/xen/bin/test-cpu-policy

CPU Policy unit tests
Testing CPU vendor identification:
Testing CPUID serialise success:
Testing CPUID deserialise failure:
Testing CPUID out-of-range clearing:
Testing MSR serialise success:
Testing MSR deserialise failure:
Testing policy compatibility success:
Testing policy compatibility failure:
Done: all ok

echo $?
0
                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                              • A
                                Andrew Top contributor @stormi
                                last edited by

                                @stormi

                                Intel NUC10i5FNH
Intel i5-10210U

CPU Policy unit tests
Testing CPU vendor identification:
Testing CPUID serialise success:
Testing CPUID deserialise failure:
Testing CPUID out-of-range clearing:
Testing MSR serialise success:
Testing MSR deserialise failure:
Testing policy compatibility success:
Testing policy compatibility failure:
Done: all ok
0

Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

Combined test results:
test-hvm32-umip                          SKIP
test-hvm64-umip                          SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
3

                                Intel NUC11PAHi5
Intel i5-1135G7

CPU Policy unit tests
Testing CPU vendor identification:
Testing CPUID serialise success:
Testing CPUID deserialise failure:
Testing CPUID out-of-range clearing:
Testing MSR serialise success:
Testing MSR deserialise failure:
Testing policy compatibility success:
Testing policy compatibility failure:
Done: all ok
0

Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

Combined test results:
test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry               CRASH
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
6

(XEN) [   93.051330] d13v0 Unknown Host LBR MSRs
(XEN) [   93.051334] domain_crash called from arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c#vmx_msr_write_intercept+0x4c2/0x510
(XEN) [   93.051335] Domain 13 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#7:
(XEN) [   93.051336] ----[ Xen-4.13.4-9.29.1  x86_64  debug=n   Tainted:    H ]----
(XEN) [   93.051337] CPU:    7
(XEN) [   93.051338] RIP:    0008:[<000000000010446e>]
(XEN) [   93.051338] RFLAGS: 0000000000000046   CONTEXT: hvm guest (d13v0)
(XEN) [   93.051340] rax: 0000000000000001   rbx: 000000000010d000   rcx: 00000000000001d9
(XEN) [   93.051340] rdx: 0000000000000000   rsi: 0000000000000000   rdi: 0000000000000000
(XEN) [   93.051341] rbp: 0000000000000000   rsp: 0000000000119fe8   r8:  000000000000000a
(XEN) [   93.051341] r9:  000000000000001e   r10: 0000000000000049   r11: 000000000000001e
(XEN) [   93.051342] r12: 0000000000000000   r13: 0000000000000000   r14: 0000000000000000
(XEN) [   93.051343] r15: 0000000000000000   cr0: 0000000080010011   cr4: 0000000000000020
(XEN) [   93.051343] cr3: 000000000010d000   cr2: 0000000000000000
(XEN) [   93.051344] fsb: 0000000000000000   gsb: 0000000000000000   gss: 0000000000000000
(XEN) [   93.051345] ds: 0033   es: 0033   fs: 0033   gs: 0033   ss: 0000   cs: 0008
(XEN) [   95.347733] d38v0 Bad rIP 800000000000 for mode 8
(XEN) [   97.443996] d70v0 Hit #DB in Xen context: e008:ffff82d0bfffb200 [ffff82d0bfffb200], stk e010:8000000000112ff0, dr6 ffff0ff0
(XEN) [   97.568064] d72v0 Hit #DB in Xen context: e008:ffff82d080371ba0 [int3], stk 0000:ffff83003368ff78, dr6 ffff2ff0

                                ASUS MINIPC PN63-S1
Intel i7-11370H

CPU Policy unit tests
Testing CPU vendor identification:
Testing CPUID serialise success:
Testing CPUID deserialise failure:
Testing CPUID out-of-range clearing:
Testing MSR serialise success:
Testing MSR deserialise failure:
Testing policy compatibility success:
Testing policy compatibility failure:
Done: all ok
0

Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

Combined test results:
test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry               CRASH
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
6

(XEN) [  356.488438] d27v0 Unknown Host LBR MSRs
(XEN) [  356.488442] domain_crash called from arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c#vmx_msr_write_intercept+0x4c2/0x510
(XEN) [  356.488443] Domain 27 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#7:
(XEN) [  356.488444] ----[ Xen-4.13.4-9.29.1  x86_64  debug=n   Tainted:    H ]----
(XEN) [  356.488445] CPU:    7
(XEN) [  356.488446] RIP:    0008:[<000000000010446e>]
(XEN) [  356.488447] RFLAGS: 0000000000000046   CONTEXT: hvm guest (d27v0)
(XEN) [  356.488448] rax: 0000000000000001   rbx: 000000000010d000   rcx: 00000000000001d9
(XEN) [  356.488449] rdx: 0000000000000000   rsi: 0000000000000000   rdi: 0000000000000000
(XEN) [  356.488449] rbp: 0000000000000000   rsp: 0000000000119fe8   r8:  000000000000000a
(XEN) [  356.488450] r9:  000000000000001e   r10: 0000000000000049   r11: 000000000000001e
(XEN) [  356.488451] r12: 0000000000000000   r13: 0000000000000000   r14: 0000000000000000
(XEN) [  356.488451] r15: 0000000000000000   cr0: 0000000080010011   cr4: 0000000000000020
(XEN) [  356.488452] cr3: 000000000010d000   cr2: 0000000000000000
(XEN) [  356.488453] fsb: 0000000000000000   gsb: 0000000000000000   gss: 0000000000000000
(XEN) [  356.488454] ds: 0033   es: 0033   fs: 0033   gs: 0033   ss: 0000   cs: 0008
(XEN) [  358.951619] d52v0 Bad rIP 800000000000 for mode 8
(XEN) [  361.254829] d84v0 Hit #DB in Xen context: e008:ffff82d0bfffb200 [ffff82d0bfffb200], stk e010:8000000000112ff0, dr6 ffff0ff0
(XEN) [  361.397060] d86v0 Hit #DB in Xen context: e008:ffff82d080371ba0 [int3], stk 0000:ffff831080c27f78, dr6 ffff2ff0

                                HP ML310e G8
Intel E3-1240 V2

CPU Policy unit tests
Testing CPU vendor identification:
Testing CPUID serialise success:
Testing CPUID deserialise failure:
Testing CPUID out-of-range clearing:
Testing MSR serialise success:
Testing MSR deserialise failure:
Testing policy compatibility success:
Testing policy compatibility failure:
Done: all ok
0

Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

Combined test results:
test-hvm32-umip                          SKIP
test-hvm64-umip                          SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
3

                                Supermicro X9DRL-7F
Intel E5-2643

CPU Policy unit tests
Testing CPU vendor identification:
Testing CPUID serialise success:
Testing CPUID deserialise failure:
Testing CPUID out-of-range clearing:
Testing MSR serialise success:
Testing MSR deserialise failure:
Testing policy compatibility success:
Testing policy compatibility failure:
Done: all ok
0

Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

Combined test results:
test-pv64-cpuid-faulting                 SKIP
test-pv64-pv-fsgsbase                    SKIP
test-hvm32-umip                          SKIP
test-hvm64-umip                          SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
3

                                HP EliteDesk 800 G3
Intel i7-7700 CPU

CPU Policy unit tests
Testing CPU vendor identification:
Testing CPUID serialise success:
Testing CPUID deserialise failure:
Testing CPUID out-of-range clearing:
Testing MSR serialise success:
Testing MSR deserialise failure:
Testing policy compatibility success:
Testing policy compatibility failure:
Done: all ok
0

Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

Combined test results:
test-hvm32-umip                          SKIP
test-hvm64-umip                          SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
3

                                ASRock 4x4 BOX-5000
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U

Testing CPU vendor identification:
Testing CPUID serialise success:
Testing CPUID deserialise failure:
Testing CPUID out-of-range clearing:
Testing MSR serialise success:
Testing MSR deserialise failure:
Testing policy compatibility success:
Testing policy compatibility failure:
Done: all ok
0

Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

Combined test results:
test-pv64-cpuid-faulting                 SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
3

                                HP DL360p Gen8
Intel E5-2680

CPU Policy unit tests
Testing CPU vendor identification:
Testing CPUID serialise success:
Testing CPUID deserialise failure:
Testing CPUID out-of-range clearing:
Testing MSR serialise success:
Testing MSR deserialise failure:
Testing policy compatibility success:
Testing policy compatibility failure:
Done: all ok
0

Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

Combined test results:
test-pv64-cpuid-faulting                 SKIP
test-pv64-pv-fsgsbase                    SKIP
test-hvm32-umip                          SKIP
test-hvm64-umip                          SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
3
                                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • stormiS
                                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Andrew
                                  last edited by

                                  @Andrew I pushed a test build of Xen in the testing repository for XCP-ng 8.3, which will hopefully solve the crash situations the tests found on your two servers.

                                  Quoting @andyhhp about what the crash message means: "The guest has tried to turn on LBR, but I don't know what that means on this CPU" where LBR stands for Last Branch Record and is used for debugging and in anti-cheat software in video games.

                                  yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
yum update xen-dom0-libs xen-dom0-tools xen-hypervisor xen-libs xen-tools --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
reboot

                                  If I understood correctly, the patches add support for more recent CPUs (Sapphire Rapids) and at the same time make it so that now when guests attempt to turn LBR on, this does nothing (but at least doesn't crash).

                                  A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A
                                    Andrew Top contributor @stormi
                                    last edited by

                                    @stormi

                                    NUC 11 (i5-1135G7) running xen-hypervisor.x86_64 0:4.13.4-10.36.0.sapphirerapids.1.xcpng8.3 no longer gives the crash error. The test runs but it still generates a Xen message:

                                    # ./xtf-runner -aqq --host ; echo Result: $?
Combined test results:
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
Result: 3

(XEN) [  119.229055] d127v0 Bad rIP 800000000000 for mode 8
(XEN) [  121.294326] d159v0 Hit #DB in Xen context: e008:ffff82d0bfffe080 [ffff82d0bfffe080], stk e010:8000000000112ff0, dr6 ffff0ff0
(XEN) [  121.418332] d161v0 Hit #DB in Xen context: e008:ffff82d080369ba0 [int3], stk 0000:ffff830896a5ff78, dr6 ffff2ff0
                                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • A
                                      andyhhp Xen Guru @Andrew
                                      last edited by andyhhp

                                      @Andrew Those are normal.

                                      Bad rIP is actually an error introduced in XSA-170 because someone misread the Intel manual. I've been trying to delete it upstream for years now. Its been so long that Intel nearly released a feature which would have required us to delete that check, and I successfully persuaded the Intel documentation team to add a footnote clarifying the statement which was misinterpreted during XSA-170.

                                      At some point in my copious free never, I should restart the argument to delete it upstream...

                                      The other two are logging from the XSA-260 fix. There's an error(/misfeature) in the x86 architecture and those would have been privilege escalations before the fix was in place. I decided when fixing XSA-260 that such attempts shouldn't be entirely silent, hence the one-liner. That particular printk() is actually common with other debugging routines, so can occur during regular development.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • olivierlambertO
                                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                        last edited by

                                        Your Xen guru badge is well earned @andyhhp 😉

                                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • A
                                          andyhhp Xen Guru @olivierlambert
                                          last edited by

                                          @olivierlambert said in XCP-ng 8.3 public alpha 🚀:

                                          Your Xen guru badge is well earned @andyhhp 😉

                                          "purveyor of general grumpiness"

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • R
                                            rRobbie
                                            last edited by rRobbie

                                            @stormi

                                            Tried on my Intel NUC11ATKC4 with N5105 and 32GB of RAM.

                                            spec from Intel site.

                                            I know it's an edge case, nevertheless here the results:

                                            [13:17 xcp-ng-1 xtf]# ./xtf-runner selftest -q --host
Combined test results:
test-hvm32-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-selftest                   SUCCESS
test-hvm64-selftest                      SUCCESS
test-pv64-selftest                       SUCCESS

                                            [13:19 xcp-ng-1 xtf]# ./xtf-runner -aq --host
Combined test results:
test-hvm32-cpuid-faulting                SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-cpuid-faulting             SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-cpuid-faulting             SUCCESS
test-hvm64-cpuid-faulting                SUCCESS
test-pv64-cpuid-faulting                 SUCCESS
test-hvm64-fpu-exception-emulation       SUCCESS
test-hvm32-invlpg~hap                    SUCCESS
test-hvm32-invlpg~shadow                 SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-invlpg~hap                 SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-invlpg~shadow              SUCCESS
test-hvm64-invlpg~hap                    SUCCESS
test-hvm64-invlpg~shadow                 SUCCESS
test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry               CRASH
test-hvm32-livepatch-priv-check          SUCCESS
test-hvm64-livepatch-priv-check          SUCCESS
test-pv64-livepatch-priv-check           SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-memop-seg                  SUCCESS
test-hvm64-memop-seg                     SUCCESS
test-pv64-memop-seg                      SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-nmi-taskswitch-priv        SUCCESS
test-pv64-pv-fsgsbase                    SUCCESS
test-pv64-pv-iopl~hypercall              SUCCESS
test-pv64-pv-iopl~vmassist               SUCCESS
test-hvm32-swint-emulation               SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-swint-emulation            SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-swint-emulation            SUCCESS
test-hvm64-swint-emulation               SUCCESS
test-hvm32-umip                          SUCCESS
test-hvm64-umip                          SUCCESS
test-hvm32-xsa-122                       SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-xsa-122                    SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-xsa-122                    SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-122                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-122                        SUCCESS
test-hvm32-xsa-123                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-hvm64-xsa-168                       SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-170                       SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-173                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
test-hvm32-xsa-186                       SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-186                       SUCCESS
test-hvm32-xsa-188                       SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-xsa-188                    SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-xsa-188                    SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-188                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-188                        SUCCESS
test-hvm32-xsa-191                       SUCCESS
test-hvm32-xsa-192                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-193                        SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-195                       SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-196                       SUCCESS
test-hvm32-xsa-200                       SUCCESS
test-hvm32-xsa-203                       SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-204                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-212                        SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-213                        SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-221                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-221                        SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-224                        SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-227                        SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-231                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-231                        SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-232                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-232                        SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-234                        SUCCESS
test-hvm32-xsa-239                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-255                        SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-259                        SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-260                        SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-261                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-265                        SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-269                       SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-277                       SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-278                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-279                        SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-286                        SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-296                        SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-298                        SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-308                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-316                        SUCCESS
test-hvm32-xsa-317                       SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-xsa-317                    SUCCESS
test-hvm32pse-xsa-317                    SUCCESS
test-hvm64-xsa-317                       SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-317                        SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-333                        SUCCESS
test-pv64-xsa-339                        SUCCESS
test-hvm32pae-xsa-consoleio-write        SUCCESS

                                            [13:21 xcp-ng-1 xtf]# /usr/libexec/xen/bin/test-cpu-policy
CPU Policy unit tests
Testing CPU vendor identification:
Testing CPUID serialise success:
Testing CPUID deserialise failure:
Testing CPUID out-of-range clearing:
Testing MSR serialise success:
Testing MSR deserialise failure:
Testing policy compatibility success:
Testing policy compatibility failure:
Done: all ok

                                            [13:21 xcp-ng-1 xtf]# ./xtf-runner -aqq --host ; echo Result: $?
Combined test results:
test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry               CRASH
test-pv64-xsa-167                        SKIP
test-pv64-xsa-182                        SKIP
Result: 6
                                            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post