XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. 456Q
    3. Best
    4
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 1
    • Posts 24
    • Groups 0

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • RE: Let's Test the HA

      Some time past and I like to pick up this old topic as I recently did some DR testing with XOSTOR as well. My pool is HA enabled and the VM configured to restart.

      I started with some basic vm migration and reboot of hosts. Disk will sync and resync fine. I was not able to cause an error performing those tasks.

      c33fd8d0-aaa8-40a5-9a08-8196ef90304f-image.png

      94fb646c-5fb2-4561-80de-d51ef503bf70-image.png

      I further removed power from the active host to cause a serious outage. The VM became unavailable. XOSTOR shortly after enabled the disk on the other node and restarted my vm automatically.
      05a6c6a9-4981-4b43-8c6c-07cd2b7734d1-image.png

      I verified that no data was lost. Made some file modifications within the vm and powered up the other node again. It re-joined the pool and synced disk no problem.

      4c521301-d237-4354-93a5-b1b721ccef97-image.png

      Its pretty much the exact same behavior we are used to have with vSAN. I'm very happy with this result !!

      I hope this helps someone that is looking for this kind of setup.

      Stefan

      posted in XOSTOR
      4
      456Q
    • RE: Let's Test the HA

      @nikade said in Let's Test the HA:

      The only thing stopping us from migrating from vSAN is that vSAN has native support for Microsoft SQL Server Failover Cluster which is a huge deal for many of our customers.

      Thats interesting and might be good for a new topic. The HA SQL Cluster was pretty much the first thing that we migrated over to XCP-NG. We would have stayed with VMware if this would not work.

      I assume you have set up a SQL Server Cluster on WSFC where IP and DISKs failover from node1 to node2?

      We have moved on many years ago (before XCP time) from this configuration to an Always On availability group for SQL. Its still a windows cluster that will failover the IP for legacy applications but does not have the disk requirement. It comes with many advantages such as:

      • You can setup the SQL HA cluster cross vSAN cluster or XCP pools. You can even mix.

      • Each SQL has independent disks and don't share "just" one. You could loos all disks in one cluster without causing downtime for SQL.

      • Always on group allow to fail over individual databases. So you can split the load between two server if you have many databases.

      There might be something that i dont know. But i know for sure that our SQL cluster is working fine on XCP-ng 🙂

      posted in XOSTOR
      4
      456Q
    • RE: Let's Test the HA

      @olivierlambert I can imagine that it was not easy. But the hard work seems to pay off at the right time. @ronan-a thank you as well !!

      Please keep up the good work. It's those days not given to find a good product with a team behind that is so responsive and willing to help and innovate at the same time.

      posted in XOSTOR
      4
      456Q
    • RE: Switching to XCP-NG, want to hear your problems

      I struggled a bit with network setup. Its super easy to setup a BOND but you have to remove it again to join hosts into a pool. This was a bit challenging for us as the juniper switches in our co-location dont support LACP fallback and we dont have direct switch access. There was also an issue where LACP was working in 8.2 but not in 8.3. It was fixed with a firmware.

      We come from an setup where we had multiple 2-node vsan cluster in 3 sites with vReplication for DR. Running more windows VMs than anything else. XCP-NG with XOSTOR and build in backup was an 1:1 replacement for us. We are very happy how everything turned out. vmware migration was working fine as well. Support is great too and much more responsive compared to what we had at vmware.

      posted in Migrate to XCP-ng
      4
      456Q
    • RE: Windows Server 2019 VM Boot Issues After Installing KB5039217 on XCP-NG 8.2

      @KPS I also patched Windows 2016 und 2022 to latest version. With xen guest tools. Both worked fine as well. We dont have a 2019 machine to test with.

      posted in Compute
      4
      456Q
    • RE: [dedicated thread] Dell Open Manage Appliance (OME)

      @AtaxyaNetwork It works !!!! Thank you so much !!!

      posted in Compute
      4
      456Q