@manilx Nice was about to ask this too lol. Glad someone point this out already

@olivierlambert Wow really nice unit makes me want to jump on those lighter fanless unit as i have lots of those 1L unit that works perfectly but has a small fans that i can hear if i really focus. I just like fanless unit to avoid dust getting in lol.

@gskger Nice. I am curious too as there are some many opensource LLM available nowadays to test out.

@julien-f Thanks a lot for this update!

@julien-f Thanks a lot Julien. So this going to be implemented in next release?

So when I run [NOSNAP] it will ignore these VDI with [NOSNAP] at the beginning of the name but just wondering when loading from the snapshot those [NOSNAP] vdi won't be loaded so i just have to add them in to the disk tab so it can be boot back up like normal correct? This is the default case currently when running snippet below.

xe vm-snapshot new-name-label="newname_YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS.sssZ" uuid=vmUUID ignore-vdi-uuids=uuid1

@Gheppy Wow great illustration i think this is perfect but only if it is feasible to implement it now...

FYI as a side note I notice that when I do ignore-vdi-uuids=uuid1,uuid2,uuid3 I notice that when I reload snapshots of the VM the ignore vdi(s) disappear in the Disks section. Which makes logical sense as those ignore-vdi-uuids are not part off the list that are snapshotted. But it's a bit of an inconvenient to add VDI back in as those vdi should still be part of the disk just not part of the snapshots. But otherwise it works great.

To snapshot do the following to ignore certain vdi(s):

xe vm-snapshot new-name-label="newname_YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS.sssZ" uuid=vmUUID ignore-vdi-uuids=uuid1

where uuid1=[NOSNAP] TESTING

Once reload the [NOSNAP] disappear:

Beside that this is the best workaround for now and this little inconvenience is not a big deal. But in case someone need to understand it hopefully I added enough detail to clarify this content for future readers.

@olivierlambert Thanks for the quick reply. [NOBAK] works for backup by ignoring VDI with [NOBAK] in its name, but when running manual snapshot like stated above the [NOBAK] still show up in the SR meaning it made a copy of the [NOBACK].

Ideally with [NOBAK] it should not take snapshot or backup right or am i understanding it incorrectly? Does this only apply to automated BACKUP & SNAPSHOT only?

@julien-f @olivierlambert
Was there a resolution on the [NOSNAP] feature just much convenient than going to the CMD each time ?

In the meantime will be using snippet below so low priority for me:

xe vm-snapshot new-name-label=newname uuid=vmUUID ignore-vdi-uuids=uuid1,uuid2,uuid3

@jmishal
XCP-ng host IP can be done in XO or XCP-ng host

Method 1:
In XO:
You can just go to home >> host >> Edit the Address (do this for each host)

Method 2:
In XCP-ng (realistically going through XO is easier...):
Go to

next >>

enter password
once here select the correct network nic (can be confusing but the .XX are vlan etc.)

Update your IP as needed.

As for changing XO IP that is a VM running on XCP-ng so you can change it there or if it is dhcp your firewall is managing that. Hard to tell how you set the XO up...

@olivierlambert Congrats you guys are expanding!

Always have appreciated everyone help here and a great community of users.

Wow this great news and amazing work!!!

@olivierlambert I never thought you took a break lol. Well deserved and have a great vacation!!!

@stormi I assume you had issue so took file down as link is giving a 404 page not found? lol

@stormi
Good things I notice on the new beta2-test3 iso:

• "efi: EFI_MEMMAP is not enabled" used to take minutes is now down to 30 sec
• host joins other host or pool really quickly (it sometime takes forever or doesn't work for me before until I manually toggle disconnect and reconnect) (hosts in pool always work fine but hosts from different pool was slow previously not sure why when they all start up at the same time is usually the issue especially when network is up slower than the hosts. I assume host search timeout before network is up.)
• UEFI is definitely fixed now

All good feedback. No drawback yet.

Also when is NFS v4 available believe it was end of 1st quarter (March???) from what i heard is that still true?

Thanks otherwise it is good on my short test so far.

@stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta :

https://updates.xcp-ng.org/tmp/xcp-ng-8.3.0-beta2-test3.iso

Testing it right now and migrating my VM over to see. My previous install SR was causing issue and disappearing on every restart for some reason lol (don't even know what causes it so decided to start fresh ). So decided to might as well test the "xcp-ng-8.3.0-beta2-test3.iso" new iso you uploaded. Will provide feedback in a few minutes.

@stormi after the update it seem to work well for me. Well the update from edk2 at least is working now. Haven't tried the iso.

@gskger Just wondering since we are on topic of storage and network. What would you guys do to make a website highly available?

My understanding is:

• Nginx or Apache to run frontend (doesn't change much) so XCP-ng can host these VMs pretty much static beside the changes to the database and the contents that is in the storage. So as long as there is a reverse proxy and load balancer it should be good.
• Database - (Mariadb with HA active-active enable) Change all the time and needs to be geo-replicated and believe MariaDB does this by itself.
• Storage - Ceph active-active sync. Maybe async work not sure... (Ceph storage best for this as it has active-active sync.)

Does that sound about right or i am missing too much detail?

@stormi Nice thanks so I can run the complete update on XOA and not worry about having to remove that single edk2 anymore that wasn't working. Will do that later

@gskger Yea the step in between is hard to justify. Esp. in my case since I have both 10G for my R720XD as well but these large servers are just too loud to be in the same room. lol . I end up not wanting to not hear these severs and reducing electrical cost.

FYI I used the one I show and used an old credit card and drill two holes in the card mount the 2.5G and insert it right in the display port I used to have on the HP800g3 lol. Fit perfect and work like a charm.

@gskger Lol yea price wise it is just 10X more but another issue is that 10G is not going to help in the hp800 g6 or in my particular case g3 is too limited. But considering I am able to build everything and run the server under $45 with penny in electricity.