Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    145 Topics
    5k Posts
    D
    @john.c The new XenPlus guest agent emits relevant warnings/errors in the Application event log whenever a failure happens somewhere in its communication with the hypervisor. This was not documented in the release, but it's much improved over the previous 9.1.200 guest agent. Right now events aren't assigned IDs yet (but you can filter by source)
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    poddingueP
    On a Lenovo SR630 V4 it took Power/Performance Bias set to OS Controlled, and on an HPE DL380 Gen 11 it was the iLO Power Regulator moved off Dynamic Power Savings to OS Control Mode, with a host reboot. Both then returned real values from xenpm get-cpufreq-para instead of the failure line. @bleader is right that two vendors is not enough to document, so if your host works, could you post the vendor, the exact setting name, where it lives, and whether you needed a reboot? Dell, Supermicro and anything AMD are the obvious gaps. I don't know whether the firmware is withholding p-state control outright or just not publishing the ACPI objects Xen looks for, so I would rather collect settings than write up a mechanism I can't back. Thanks!
  • 3k Topics
    29k Posts
    poddingueP
    That question has come round three times on this thread since 2020, so it isn't a one-off. I'd rather not promise documentation I can't deliver, but I can take it to the people who decide and come back here either way, including if the answer is that proxy deployment stays an XOA thing. On the licensing side I'd sooner not encourage patching those checks out, mostly because I don't know what they're guarding. In the meantime, the two community scripts in this thread are what people are actually running, which is worth saying plainly even though it isn't the documented path you asked for.
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    50 Topics
    796 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    Great, thanks for the feedback!
  • 37 Topics
    134 Posts
    AtaxyaNetworkA
    Déja une piste intéressante, on dirait que pour une raison quelconque l'iso est mount deux fois [image: 1786437651889-14d66748-1d54-411a-b62a-a3691d6decd9-image.jpeg]