XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • D

      XCP-NG 8.3 Crash on Shutdown - HP DL360 g9

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
      4
      0 Votes
      4 Posts
      89 Views
      TeddyAstieT
      @dlucas said in XCP-NG 8.3 Crash on Shutdown - HP DL360 g9: Have checked the IML log and the only thing that is being logged is this: "13","Critical","PCI Bus","12/04/2025 00:03","12/04/2025 00:03","1","PCI Bus Error (Slot 0, Bus 0, Device 2, Function 2)", "12","Critical","PCI Bus","12/03/2025 23:01","12/03/2025 23:01","1","PCI Bus Error (Slot 0, Bus 0, Device 2, Function 2)", "11","Critical","PCI Bus","12/03/2025 22:53","12/03/2025 22:53","1","PCI Bus Error (Slot 0, Bus 0, Device 2, Function 2)", "10","Critical","PCI Bus","12/01/2025 23:44","12/01/2025 23:44","1","PCI Bus Error (Slot 0, Bus 0, Device 2, Function 2)", "9","Critical","PCI Bus","12/01/2025 01:31","12/01/2025 01:31","1","PCI Bus Error (Slot 0, Bus 0, Device 2, Function 2)", I thought that a shutdown command from the command prompt solved the issue but it seems to always reboot when ever you tell it to shutdown. What is device 00:02.2 (through lspci) ?
    • olivierlambertO

      🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
      49
      5 Votes
      49 Posts
      2k Views
      pdoniasP
      Thanks for all the feedback! @ph7 said in ️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!: I found another link that isn't completely fixed https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/10613/suspicius-presentation-of-time-in-backup/ Are you in UTC+1? This one might simply be because the VM's name shows the UTC time while, in the tables, we convert dates to your actual timezone. @acebmxer, @ph7 said in ️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!: In thin provisioning It would be nice to have info about a VMs actual use of disk space We're actually in the middle of improving how sizes are measured in general: SRs (thin/thick), VDIs, snapshots, chains of VDIs, transfered vs used vs allocated size, etc. @acebmxer said in ️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!: XOA v5 links not working... We're still fixing a few things regarding this. It will most likely be fixed very soon @Alexander-0 said in ️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!: With XO from source if I put config.mounts.toml into /etc/xo-server/ I have to provide absolute paths instead of relative ones Both should work. Do you start xo-server in any specific way?
    • M

      XO Lite: Change URL

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XO Lite
      4
      0 Votes
      4 Posts
      270 Views
      olivierlambertO
      It's not meant to be used like that. If you are behind a NAT, the right approach is to have your XOA behind the NAT and inside the same network than the hosts. That's because hosts will always use and return their internal IPs to connect to some resources (stats, consoles etc.). XOA deals with that easily as being the "main control point" for all hosts behind your NAT (or a XO proxy if you prefer).
    • CyrilleC

      Xen Orchestra Container Storage Interface (CSI) for Kubernetes

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Infrastructure as Code
      11
      4 Votes
      11 Posts
      588 Views
      olivierlambertO
      The roadmap depends a lot on the feedback we have on it More demand/popular, faster we'll implement stuff
    • N

      Fibre Channel on Lenovo (Hardware Compatibility)?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
      1
      0 Votes
      1 Posts
      5 Views
      No one has replied
    • bullerwinsB

      Intel iGPU passthough

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
      44
      0 Votes
      44 Posts
      17k Views
      V
      @ovicz Yes, it's loaded lsmod | grep i915 i915 5373952 0 i2c_algo_bit 20480 2 xe,i915 drm_buddy 32768 2 xe,i915 video 81920 2 xe,i915 ttm 135168 3 drm_ttm_helper,xe,i915 drm_display_helper 331776 2 xe,i915 cec 106496 3 drm_display_helper,xe,i915 dmesg starts the same as your output, the only difference is that I have GuC disabled. dmesg | grep i915 [ 1.609000] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] Found alderlake_s (device ID 4690) integrated display version 12.00 stepping C0 [ 1.609986] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] VT-d active for gfx access [ 1.610073] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] Using Transparent Hugepages [ 1.611342] i915 0000:00:08.0: Invalid PCI ROM header signature: expecting 0xaa55, got 0x4556 [ 1.611345] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] Failed to find VBIOS tables (VBT) [ 1.612136] i915 0000:00:08.0: vgaarb: VGA decodes changed: olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=none:owns=io+mem [ 1.614455] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] Finished loading DMC firmware i915/adls_dmc_ver2_01.bin (v2.1) [ 3.583673] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] [ENCODER:261:DDI A/PHY A] failed to retrieve link info, disabling eDP [ 3.605422] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] GT0: GuC firmware i915/tgl_guc_70.bin version 70.49.4 [ 3.605426] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] GT0: HuC firmware i915/tgl_huc.bin version 7.9.3 [ 3.615402] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] GT0: HuC: authenticated for all workloads [ 3.615410] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] GT0: GUC: submission disabled [ 3.615414] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] GT0: GUC: SLPC disabled [ 3.616508] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] Protected Xe Path (PXP) protected content support initialized [ 3.617330] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] Registered 4 planes with drm panic [ 3.617354] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 for 0000:00:08.0 on minor 1 [ 3.627390] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes [ 3.637349] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes [ 3.657358] i915 0000:00:08.0: [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes Having edited /etc/modprobe.d/i915.conf by adding options i915 enable_guc=3 enable_huc=1 fixed the GuC part as well, however I still have the same issue. Cannot find any crtc or sizes is the only part which is not in your output. /etc/default/grub is clean, I don't have NOMODESET: cat /etc/default/grub GRUB_TIMEOUT=5 GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release)" GRUB_DEFAULT=saved GRUB_DISABLE_SUBMENU=true GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT="console" GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.lvm.lv=fedora/root rhgb quiet" GRUB_DISABLE_RECOVERY="true"
    • D

      SR.Scan performance withing XOSTOR

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XOSTOR
      5
      0 Votes
      5 Posts
      128 Views
      I
      Very similar situation on our end. Lots of back and forth with support. Basically, given up now. The latest patch seemed to have helped a bit but overall not a production ready product yet.
    • A

      Xen Orchestra from source ignores config.toml from /etc/xo-server/

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
      2
      0 Votes
      2 Posts
      60 Views
      A
      Ok I've figured out root cause. My config override has only one option: ignoreVmSnapshotResources = true And I had to change it with adding [selfService] on a line below Also I found out that override config for XO5 interface needs to have absolute paths to xo-web and @XenOrchestra in it. With relative paths it didn't work.
    • P

      NOT_SUPPORTED_DURING_UPGRADE()

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Management
      15
      0 Votes
      15 Posts
      243 Views
      stormiS
      We do warn about the certificate situation in the 8.3 release notes, indeed, but it's easy to get caught by that. There's a way to temporarily disable LTS verification on the new hosts in order to join it to the existing pool. See https://docs.xcp-ng.org/releases/release-8-3/#certificate-verification-xs which in turns points to https://docs.xenserver.com/en-us/xenserver/8/hosts-pools/certificate-verification where you'll find that command. Regarding your initial situation, I'm not 100% sure, but I think Warm Migration, might be a way to migrate your VMs off your slave hosts while minimizing downtime. I don't know how it plays with CBT and heterogenous pool state exactly though.