@jerry1333 said: There is nothing else on that host and this is only host in pool but it's using 30% of cpu all the time? it's not using 30% of CPU, you see a graph of cumulated (switch is on) core consumption of your 32 cores. never switch this on. it adds up like that : 32x1%=32%, wrongfully letting you think you are at 30%ish CPU usage.

@pierrebrunet Thanks for the update. Glad to know its not something unique to our environment and you were able to track down the cause!

@rzr: Sorry, first and foremost I totally forgot to say thank you very much. I really appreciate you work and effort for this "non-core" issue. That said, I can say that it works on my test machines. I could successfully install and connected to a APC Smart-UPS 750 (SMT750RMI2UC) to my test server. Not a single problem whatsoever. I will now monitor it a bit and if I observe anything I will let you know. Is there maybe anything particular you are interested in for me to test?

Ping @gregoire

@AshleyDe It was exactly that, but complicated by the abandoned status of the fuse-native module being used for XOA in 2023. That module contained binary blobs, but unfortunately no binary for aarch64. Being abandoned meant getting aarch64 into that module was not possible. My horrible bodge was to swap to an alternative module for fuse-native that built from source. Thus it avoided the missing aarch64 blob, but required additional dependancies for the compile to work. I'm no longer using XOA on the aarch64 platform in my home lab so I haven't kept up to date on whether this is still needed in 2026.

Hello @tsukraw , normally your client should be able to bind the new license on their XOA. BTW, you talk about binding the license to a pool but an XOA license is bound to an XOA. I suggest your customer open a support ticket so we can help them with that issue.

If you're looking for a quick way to verify those files without running a full restoration test every single time, you can usually run a checksum comparison (MD5 or SHA256) against the original data. For a more 'point and click' approach to double-check specific files or verify hashes quickly, I've used https://thetoolapp.com/utilities/file-integrity-checker/ before. It’s pretty handy for a quick integrity check if you aren't in the mood to mess around with the command line for every single backup set.

For my reference later. wget http://downloads.hpe.com/pub/softlib2/software1/pubsw-linux/p1257348637/v76502/hpacucli-9.20-9.0.x86_64.rpm yum install -y --nogpgcheck hpacucli-9.20-9.0.x86_64.rpm hpacucli controller slot=0 physicaldrive all show

Hi @Pilow, Thanks for the report. We are aware that there are many problems with the FLR. We would like to fix them but they are not easy to fix, and we can't give an estimation date for a fix. I've linked this topic to our investigation ticket. For the moment, when FLR fails, we recommend to manually restore your files by following this documentation: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/blob/master/%40vates/fuse-vhd/README.md#restore-a-file-from-a-vhd-using-fuse-vhd-cli