XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • T

      Manual CPU feature Masks (every CPU is a potato)?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
      12
      0 Votes
      12 Posts
      43 Views
      T
      @MajorP93 said: What you are describing must be a storage live migration then (XenMotion). That should work across pools, yes. I stand corrected because I did not factor in this variant in my initial answer. Yes, that's it - sorry - I should have been more explicit, even if 'lumbers along' wasn't a hint //EDIT: also there is no such thing as non-pool hosts. Even a single host setup has it's own pool. Pedantic, but true I technically meant 'not hosts in the source pool' I guess.
    • jgraftonJ

      CPU pegged at 100% in several Rocky Linux 8 VMs without workload in guest

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Compute
      30
      0 Votes
      30 Posts
      6k Views
      olivierlambertO
      That's great! Thanks for your feedback @laszlobortel
    • rvreugdeR

      Custom Provider support for Parallels RAS CPF integration

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
      2
      0 Votes
      2 Posts
      43 Views
      DanpD
      @rvreugde I believe this is already being reviewed internally.
    • dvdwxD

      ACL Permissions to CPU Topology on Self-Service Resource Set

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Management
      4
      3
      0 Votes
      4 Posts
      233 Views
      dvdwxD
      @john.c my XO is compiled from sources... on future i will try config the v.6 to use the RBAC ACL for this case. @poddingue Thanks for your response, i will look this in a near future... My Cluster here is used only by the Tech/NOC team for tests/homologation purposes , beside that we are studying other virtualization systems because we will decrease our dependency on VMware on next year. Soon i will try change a few configurations and overview the v.6 to try fix this issue.
    • J

      PCIe Pass-through lanes and lane performance

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Compute
      26
      0 Votes
      26 Posts
      2k Views
      olivierlambertO
      Also a question for @Team-XAPI-Network
    • J

      xcp-ng server crashed/rebooted due to issues with drbd/linstor?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XOSTOR
      7
      0 Votes
      7 Posts
      608 Views
      poddingueP
      That it's stayed quiet since you throttled Velero is a good sign, and it lines up with the concurrency theory rather than anything about the specific volumes. Bumping dom0 RAM makes sense too, since linstor-satellite spiking to roughly 8,700 log lines around the panic suggests dom0 was under real pressure right then. If it does come back, a xen-bugtool --yestoall bundle from the host that panicked, plus the Loki window you already have, would give @Team-Storage something concrete to line up against the DRBD side. I'm not sure whether the real fix sits in Velero's pacing or in how LINSTOR handles concurrent create/delete, but the reproduction you've narrowed down is genuinely useful. Fingers crossed it stays boring from here.
    • michael.manleyM

      XCP-ng Center 25.04 Released

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
      28
      7 Votes
      28 Posts
      44k Views
      A
      @michael.manley Would it be possible to backport the XSA-498 fixes? I've tried updating the SDK as a whole but it resulted in a lot of churn and caused errors elsewhere: https://github.com/xcp-ng/xenadmin/pull/271 The fixes to the SDK have been posted here https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api/pull/7176 and here: https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-498.html last-genius opened this pull request in xcp-ng/xenadmin draft Update the SDK to 26.16.0 #271 alexbrett opened this pull request in xapi-project/xen-api open [SDK] Corrected certificate validation for HTTP calls #7176
    • P

      Error mirroring full backups to backblaze b2

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      21
      2
      0 Votes
      21 Posts
      1k Views
      P
      @poddingue Hi! Unfortunately, another error came up on the larger vms. The job also seems to be painfully slow. Slower than usual I mean. Also, it seems that job changes are not being commited. I've changed the job so it wouldn't retry in case of failure and the log shows it still trying 3 times (that was the old setting, and probably explains the job taking longer than usual). [image: 1784017759119-a917295e-ea92-4173-bc5a-7c9652a8d2ad-image.jpeg] { "id": "0mrjahr8e-ssawlbveq5", "start": 1783951215134, "status": "failure", "tasks": [ { "id": "0mrjahs3e-dbfaqajeze", "start": 1783951216250, "status": "failure", "tasks": [ { "id": "0mrjahs8s-2yb6i3fny6f", "start": 1783951216444, "status": "failure", "end": 1783959266484, "result": { "$fault": "server", "$metadata": { "httpStatusCode": 500, "requestId": "c0a9f30190109f99", "extendedRequestId": "aMJgyljkPZEdiEDW0Nk9lTmbINpI1FGIP", "attempts": 3, "totalRetryDelay": 197 }, "name": "InternalError", "Code": "InternalError", "message": "internal incident", "stack": "InternalError: internal incident\n at ProtocolLib.getErrorSchemaOrThrowBaseException (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/core/dist-cjs/submodules/protocols/index.js:70:67)\n at S3RestXmlProtocol.handleError (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/core/dist-cjs/submodules/protocols/index.js:1856:65)\n at S3RestXmlProtocol.deserializeResponse (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@smithy/core/dist-cjs/submodules/protocols/index.js:341:24)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:104:5)\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@smithy/core/dist-cjs/submodules/schema/index.js:25:24\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/middleware-sdk-s3/dist-cjs/submodules/s3/index.js:367:20\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@smithy/core/dist-cjs/submodules/retry/index.js:172:50\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/checksums/dist-cjs/index.js:337:24\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/middleware-sdk-s3/dist-cjs/submodules/s3/index.js:64:28\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/middleware-sdk-s3/dist-cjs/submodules/s3/index.js:91:20" }, "message": "transfer", "data": { "progress": 40 } } ], "end": 1783959266485, "result": { "$fault": "server", "$metadata": { "httpStatusCode": 500, "requestId": "c0a9f30190109f99", "extendedRequestId": "aMJgyljkPZEdiEDW0Nk9lTmbINpI1FGIP", "attempts": 3, "totalRetryDelay": 197 }, "name": "InternalError", "Code": "InternalError", "message": "internal incident", "stack": "InternalError: internal incident\n at ProtocolLib.getErrorSchemaOrThrowBaseException (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/core/dist-cjs/submodules/protocols/index.js:70:67)\n at S3RestXmlProtocol.handleError (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/core/dist-cjs/submodules/protocols/index.js:1856:65)\n at S3RestXmlProtocol.deserializeResponse (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@smithy/core/dist-cjs/submodules/protocols/index.js:341:24)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:104:5)\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@smithy/core/dist-cjs/submodules/schema/index.js:25:24\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/middleware-sdk-s3/dist-cjs/submodules/s3/index.js:367:20\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@smithy/core/dist-cjs/submodules/retry/index.js:172:50\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/checksums/dist-cjs/index.js:337:24\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/middleware-sdk-s3/dist-cjs/submodules/s3/index.js:64:28\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/middleware-sdk-s3/dist-cjs/submodules/s3/index.js:91:20" }, "message": "export", "data": { "id": "14b59f44-4517-411e-9e39-4eb7136928d0", "type": "remote", "isFull": true } }, { "id": "0mrjfabp3-c8mf2pnq8yf", "start": 1783959266487, "status": "success", "warnings": [ { "data": { "path": "xo-vm-backups/60b4d2a7-3f91-f0f9-b0a0-f834df3ff9ee/cache.json.gz", "actual": 0, "expected": 1 }, "message": "unexpected number of entries in backup cache" } ], "end": 1783959266989, "result": { "merge": false, "size": 0 }, "message": "clean-vm" } ], "end": 1783959266989, "result": { "$fault": "server", "$metadata": { "httpStatusCode": 500, "requestId": "c0a9f30190109f99", "extendedRequestId": "aMJgyljkPZEdiEDW0Nk9lTmbINpI1FGIP", "attempts": 3, "totalRetryDelay": 197 }, "name": "InternalError", "Code": "InternalError", "message": "internal incident", "stack": "InternalError: internal incident\n at ProtocolLib.getErrorSchemaOrThrowBaseException (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/core/dist-cjs/submodules/protocols/index.js:70:67)\n at S3RestXmlProtocol.handleError (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/core/dist-cjs/submodules/protocols/index.js:1856:65)\n at S3RestXmlProtocol.deserializeResponse (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@smithy/core/dist-cjs/submodules/protocols/index.js:341:24)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:104:5)\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@smithy/core/dist-cjs/submodules/schema/index.js:25:24\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/middleware-sdk-s3/dist-cjs/submodules/s3/index.js:367:20\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@smithy/core/dist-cjs/submodules/retry/index.js:172:50\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/checksums/dist-cjs/index.js:337:24\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/middleware-sdk-s3/dist-cjs/submodules/s3/index.js:64:28\n at async /opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202607120728/node_modules/@aws-sdk/middleware-sdk-s3/dist-cjs/submodules/s3/index.js:91:20" }, "message": "backup VM", "data": { "id": "60b4d2a7-3f91-f0f9-b0a0-f834df3ff9ee", "type": "VM", "progress": 0 } },
    • P

      RDNA 4 GPU Passthrough

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Compute
      28
      0 Votes
      28 Posts
      2k Views
      P
      @ravenet Sure, gave that a whirl and no change, though I did notice some nvtop weirdness as it would show some load, but most of the wait time there was actually no load on the GPUs instead of the constant load matching the model being loaded. For some historical context ARI support was initially disabled in the bios when I started this thread. That was on the list of things I enabled when I started seeing some success with ollama (something in the changes since has broken ollama now too, but there was at least some forward progress after enabling). dmesg output overall looked the same, but I did see this output on the console (and in dmesg) that seemed interesting. Not 100% sure at this point if this was in the previous dmesg outputs or not, but may be worth sharing. EDIT: looks like this may actually be new... I looked back through the past dm dmesg outputs and I did not see this output. [ 108.547683] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: MES(0) failed to respond to msg=REMOVE_QUEUE [ 108.547729] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: failed to remove hardware queue from MES, doorbell=0x1202 [ 108.547746] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: MES might be in unrecoverable state, issue a GPU reset [ 108.547774] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: Failed to evict queue 2 [ 108.547789] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: Failed to evict process queues [ 108.547803] amdgpu: Failed to quiesce KFD [ 108.547870] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: GPU reset begin!. Source: 3 [ 109.656850] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: Failed to remove queue 0 [ 109.657324] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: Dumping IP State [ 109.756265] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: Dumping IP State Completed [ 112.047695] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: MODE1 reset [ 112.047797] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: GPU mode1 reset [ 112.054505] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: GPU smu mode1 reset [ 113.075393] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: GPU reset succeeded, trying to resume [ 113.090354] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: [drm] PCIE GART of 512M enabled (table at 0x00000087D6B00000). [ 113.092905] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: [drm] AMDGPU device coredump file has been created [ 113.092913] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: [drm] Check your /sys/class/drm/card1/device/devcoredump/data [ 113.092917] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: VRAM is lost due to GPU reset! [ 113.092921] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: PSP is resuming... [ 114.997591] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: GECC is disabled, set amdgpu_ras_enable=1 to enable GECC in next boot cycle if needed [ 115.091125] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: RAP: optional rap ta ucode is not available [ 115.091130] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: SECUREDISPLAY: optional securedisplay ta ucode is not available [ 115.091134] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: SMU is resuming... [ 115.091375] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: smu driver if version = 0x0000002e, smu fw if version = 0x00000033, smu fw program = 0, smu fw version = 0x00684c00 (104.76.0) [ 115.432371] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: SMU is resumed successfully! [ 115.445556] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: program CP_MES_CNTL : 0x4000000 [ 115.445731] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: program CP_MES_CNTL : 0xc000000 [ 115.750240] amdgpu 0000:00:09.0: [drm] DMUB hardware initialized: version=0x0A000800 As an update for other things I have tried, in order to eliminate hardware issues, or bios settings I tried installing proxmox and spinning up a VM there with both GPUs passed through and it worked just fine... With that feedback I did a fresh install of XCP-NG 8.3 and spun up a fresh VM using the same steps as I used on proxmox and still no dice. This leads me to believe the issue is somewhere in the XCP-NG passthrough stack with my specific hardware...