XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • AlexanderKA

      Nested Virtualization in xcp-ng

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Compute
      9
      0 Votes
      9 Posts
      54 Views
      A
      @AlexanderK said: @abudef this causes some vms not to boot You mean that when you enable Nested virtualization in the VM settings under the Advanced tab, the VM then fails to boot?
    • J

      XO-Lite ne se lance plus

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved French (Français)
      4
      1 Votes
      4 Posts
      38 Views
      J
      @yann Ce n'est pas de la PROD. Si ma compréhension est bonne, après recherche, le stockage vers la LUN NetAPP (iSCSI) a été perdu, la mode HA étant actif (les volumes HA n'était plus accessible). [10:05 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# xe vm-list The server could not join the liveset because the HA daemon could not access the heartbeat disk. [10:06 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# xe host-emergency-ha-disable Error: This operation is dangerous and may cause data loss. This operation must be forced (use --force). [10:06 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# xe host-emergency-ha-disable --force [10:06 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# xe-toolstack-restart Executing xe-toolstack-restart done. [10:07 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# Côté stockage [10:09 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# xe pbd-list sr-uuid=16ec6b11-6110-7a27-4d94-dfcc09f34d15 uuid ( RO) : be5ac5cc-bc70-4eef-8b01-a9ed98f83e23 host-uuid ( RO): 0219cb2e-46b8-4657-bfa4-c924b59e373a sr-uuid ( RO): 16ec6b11-6110-7a27-4d94-dfcc09f34d15 device-config (MRO): SCSIid: 3600a098038323566622b5a5977776557; targetIQN: iqn.1992-08.com.netapp:sn.89de0ec3fba011f0be0bd039eae42297:vs.8; targetport: 3260; target: 172.17.10.1; multihomelist: 172.17.10.1:3260,172.17.11.1:3260,172.17.1.1:3260,172.17.0.1:3260 currently-attached ( RO): false uuid ( RO) : a2dd4324-ce32-5a5e-768f-cc0df10dc49a host-uuid ( RO): cb9a2dc3-cc1d-4467-99eb-6896503b4e11 sr-uuid ( RO): 16ec6b11-6110-7a27-4d94-dfcc09f34d15 device-config (MRO): multiSession: 172.17.1.1,3260,iqn.1992-08.com.netapp:sn.89de0ec3fba011f0be0bd039eae42297:vs.8|172.17.0.1,3260,iqn.1992-08.com.netapp:sn.89de0ec3fba011f0be0bd039eae42297:vs.8|; target: 172.17.0.1; targetIQN: *; SCSIid: 3600a098038323566622b5a5977776557; multihomelist: 172.17.1.1:3260,172.17.10.1:3260,172.17.11.1:3260,172.17.0.1:3260 currently-attached ( RO): false [10:09 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# xe pbd-plug uuid=be5ac5cc-bc70-4eef-8b01-a9ed98f83e23 Error code: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_47 Error parameters: , The SR is not available [opterr=no such volume group: VG_XenStorage-16ec6b11-6110-7a27-4d94-dfcc09f34d15], [10:10 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# Après ca, XO-Lite s'est correctement relancé.
    • F

      Just FYI: current update seams to break NUT dependancies

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XCP-ng
      5
      0 Votes
      5 Posts
      125 Views
      K
      It looks like "yum remove nut" does the trick.
    • K

      Suggestion: Check if requirements for backups are met before shutting down VMs...

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      3
      0 Votes
      3 Posts
      56 Views
      K
      @olivierlambert done.
    • K

      IPMI/ IDRAC (XAPI)

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved REST API
      1
      0 Votes
      1 Posts
      31 Views
      No one has replied
    • H

      Potential bug with Windows VM backup: "Body Timeout Error"

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      54
      3
      2 Votes
      54 Posts
      6k Views
      C
      Amazing timing. I have been having this issue with a VM I just set up and I came here to find out if this is a known problem, only to discover that the 97 patches I have been planning to install tonight are going to fix it.
    • B

      "Guest tools status"

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Migrate to XCP-ng
      1
      0 Votes
      1 Posts
      38 Views
      No one has replied