1. Home
  2. Popular
Log in to post
  • stormiS

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Pinned News
    481
    1 Votes
    481 Posts
    196k Views
    M
    @MajorP93 Pls note that the updates had no issues. Just the RPU did not complete. 2 different things.....
  • J

    Building from source, now introduces local changes in typed-router.d.ts?

    Xen Orchestra
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    44 Views
    J
    I'm guessing this comes from commit https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/9700 As this one lists the rows in typed-router.d.ts I mentioned above. But those lines are present in the latest commit? I am super confused Elise-FZI opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra closed fix(xo6): remove dev pages in prod #9700
  • C

    Error while scanning disk

    Backup
    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    280 Views
    poddingueP
    Thanks, Florent, for the explanation.
  • JamfoFLJ

    Xen Orchestra has stopped updating commits

    Xen Orchestra
    29
    0 Votes
    29 Posts
    9k Views
    florentF
    ping @julienxovates I think we can change thie behavior ( accepting a xo-server start even if a zombie process is still running)
  • M

    CR backup with retention > 4

    Backup
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    199 Views
    florentF
    florent said: @McHenry yes your replicated VMmaye be a little slower, and removing these snapshot can lead to a big and slow coalesce, but these tradeoff can be worth it for replication we will try to clarify it for the 6.5 version ( end of may ) ping @julienxovates
  • H

    89 vulnerabilities in XAPI / Citrix XenServer

    Solved Development
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    922 Views
    TeddyAstieT
    Xen Project covered this as XSA-489.
  • olivierlambertO

    🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

    Pinned Xen Orchestra
    184
    7 Votes
    184 Posts
    24k Views
    G
    @MajorP93 Before the LTS release UEFI worked extremely well, something kind of went sideways when it hit release. I only have a single UEFI VM, it was created under version 8.2 and does not give me trouble. I guess I need to get my lab back up, had a UPS fail and shut everything off a few days ago. Then I need to test UEFI VMs and see what I can see. But back when it went LTS I reinstalled from scratch and tried to do everything through XO-lite to get the first VM running and found that Debian 13 or Windows Server 2022 would not boot if I created them with UEFI. Since then I haven't tested this again. I'm also tempted to just move my whole lab to version 9, waiting for the next ISO to land and I may do this. I can run real testing workloads on Harvester for the time being and maybe play around migrating back and forth between both systems.