XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • A

      GPU share to more Windows VMs on same XCP-NG node

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
      10
      0 Votes
      10 Posts
      357 Views
      A
      @tjkreidl I found that some Intel PRO GPU card have SRV-IO without any additional license, but this functionality is supported in Linux kernel 6.12 and up. I hope in new XCP-NG will have 6.12+ and support GPU sharing.
    • stormiS

      XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
      530
      1 Votes
      530 Posts
      235k Views
      I
      I am testing QCOW2. I do create 190 VMs on a single SR. The latency is growing with the count of VDIs on SR. [image: 1779297675818-3cbbd0d1-c3c1-4e9d-b74b-1933b6a64c51-image.jpeg] I got FC attached HPE AllFlash Storage. The other SR on same Storage has no performance impact. [image: 1779298232433-30494607-9e20-401f-b4c1-f04e03f0385d-image.jpeg] First 52 VMs was created without any problem. Than problems started. This VMs failed: #53 #94 #99 #100 #104 #106 #109 #110 #113 #115 #117 #120 #122 #124 #125 #128 #131 #136 #138 #145 #146 #152 #154 [... still pending] It loos like VDI.create for CloudConfigDrive runs into timeout. { "id": "0mpe928xl-jc1cgkgsmi", "properties": { "method": "vm.create", "params": { "name_label": "xcp-ng-vm156.lab.company.net", "name_description": "Test VM", "template": "0521468a-882b-9dd7-5add-2be588a389f8", "clone": false, "existingDisks": { "0": { "name_label": "xcp-ng-vm156.lab.company.net C", "$SR": "43dbbe8e-039a-e66c-f6cb-d88de4f4d962" } }, "CPUs": 4, "memory": 4294967296, "VIFs": [ { "network": "261a821c-a373-ba36-2c44-487ed0e1a202" } ], "cloudConfig": "**secret**", "coreOs": false, "bootAfterCreate": true, "destroyCloudConfigVdiAfterBoot": true, "tags": [ "win-cloud-init", "DUMMY" ], "hvmBootFirmware": "uefi" }, "name": "API call: vm.create", "userId": "033c2a08-7b45-4782-92f6-43acb73fe172", "type": "api.call" }, "start": 1779292916409, "status": "failure", "updatedAt": 1779294849770, "end": 1779294849770, "result": { "name": "HeadersTimeoutError", "code": "UND_ERR_HEADERS_TIMEOUT", "message": "Headers Timeout Error", "call": { "duration": 302136, "method": "VDI.create", "params": [ "* session id *", { "name_label": "XO CloudConfigDrive", "other_config": {}, "read_only": false, "sharable": false, "SR": "OpaqueRef:97a26f7e-0536-84de-f72c-49f11635df2d", "type": "user", "virtual_size": 10486272 } ] }, "stack": "HeadersTimeoutError: Headers Timeout Error\n at FastTimer.onParserTimeout [as _onTimeout] (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/undici/lib/dispatcher/client-h1.js:642:28)\n at Timeout.onTick [as _onTimeout] (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/undici/lib/util/timers.js:162:13)\n at listOnTimeout (node:internal/timers:585:17)\n at processTimers (node:internal/timers:521:7)" } } The support tunnel is open, id: 40797 Feel free, it's lab environment.
    • M

      Too many snapshots

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      48
      2
      0 Votes
      48 Posts
      3k Views
      florentF
      @julienXOvates PR is here https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/9868 fbeauchamp opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra open fix(xo-web): ignore the number of snapshot of replicated VM in the health dashboard #9868
    • MathieuM

      Host crash during backup

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      11
      0 Votes
      11 Posts
      1k Views
      BrantleyHobbsB
      @Danp fully patched 8.3 (through the most recent May patches). XO commit d810e (master commit e3a58). I usually update XO around the first of each month; so it's a little bit behind master. There are crash logs in /var/crash. I can provide a log bundle if needed, or copy/paste some info here if I know what to provide.
    • Tristis OrisT

      Continuous replication auto start

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      5
      0 Votes
      5 Posts
      382 Views
      julienXOvatesJ
      Hi @tonyp90, strange that this happened on your backup host as it is not supposed to, since we prevent VMs to auto-start when Incremental Replication target host is rebooted (see https://docs.xen-orchestra.com/xo5/incremental_replication). Which XO version are you running ? Do you have a license so you could open a support ticket ?
    • D

      xe-gues-utilities woes on openSUSE Leap 16

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XCP-ng
      2
      0 Votes
      2 Posts
      25 Views
      AtaxyaNetworkA
      @damjank Hi ! Did you have any error when trying to install the tools ?
    • M

      XO Console: Modifier keys stuck, unable to enter passwords

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
      14
      0 Votes
      14 Posts
      2k Views
      poddingueP
      Thanks for the clarification, @dsmteam !
    • N

      Create a new SR: qcow2 failure

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Management
      8
      7
      0 Votes
      8 Posts
      176 Views
      florentF
      also do you have a reverse proxy/ http proxy in front of xo ? it can block the bigger upload by default
    • W

      VDI not showing in XO 5 from Source.

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Management
      52
      2
      0 Votes
      52 Posts
      6k Views
      A
      @limezest You're right, we'll fix this. With this typo, the elif branch will always be false and not executed, it's dead code. As it is a less common issue than the first branch of the if, the script will left behind this particular case but will still fix the majority of snapshot_of problems. The script can still be used safely.
    • J

      Backups Fail with ENOENT: no such file or directory

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      8
      0 Votes
      8 Posts
      336 Views
      J
      @pierrebrunet sorry for the delay in responding... I scored some time out of the office. Before replying, I rebuilt the XO server using the latest version and created a new backup identical to the last. Just wanted to be sure this issue wasn't fixed... I've attached the log. 2026-05-20T21_41_04.958Z - backup NG.json.txt
    • F

      Reverting to a snapshot in XO Lite

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XO Lite
      1
      0 Votes
      1 Posts
      6 Views
      No one has replied
    • maximsachsM

      XCP-ng 8.3: Broadcom BCM57414 `bnxt_en` Driver Fails to Probe on HPE DL380a Gen12

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
      10
      2 Votes
      10 Posts
      709 Views
      maximsachsM
      @yannsionneau @thierryescande Thank you very much for the updates! We are scheduling some downtime on the services in the upcoming weeks, then I hope to be able to try out all your suggestions. Our fallback plan is to switch the Broadcom network cards for other Melanox cards. I will be posting the results once we have them!
    • M

      log_fs_usage / /var/log directory on pool master filling up constantly

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XCP-ng
      21
      1
      0 Votes
      21 Posts
      2k Views
      poddingueP
      The sr.scan-driven SMlog growth angle that gumbo2k surfaced is a real lead; there's some context in the storage-related log files reference, but the docs don't go as far as "here's how to throttle it safely on a pool where the underlying disks should spin down." Soft ping to @Team-Storage and @Team-Hypervisor-Kernel: could one of you weigh in on whether other-config:auto-scan=false on the SR is the supported way to reduce scan pressure, or if there's a better lever? I don't want to send anyone down a path that breaks an SR. Apologies if this has already been answered somewhere I haven't seen.
    • johnnezeroJ

      Server Admin Guide: A Tale of Two Servers: BIOS, GPU, and NUMA Tuning for XCP-ng: Preserving the valuable work done by Tobias Kreidl (@tjkreidl)

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
      7
      2 Votes
      7 Posts
      203 Views
      tjkreidlT
      @poddingue Good evening. Honestly, I'd be totally fine with your taking over a full copy of everything over to XCP-ng and augmenting it over time as new information becomes available. It'd stand a better change of longevity there than in my hands, and all I'd ask for is acknowledgement for the original work. There's no real need for me to keep a totally separate copy of the materials, which would only lead to confusion as things likely would diverse over time. As mentioned above, there are more forum articles and such out there, and when I have time, I'll see if I can hunt some more of those down, as well. I really appreciate what you folks are doing at XCP-ng and the time and effort you're putting into your products. Above all, the feedback and communication have been better than pretty much anyone else I've ever dealt with in the IT industry. P.S. @johnnezero did a super summarizing job with his "Series Overview & Quick Reference" that includes some of the most useful commands in addition to a synopsis of each of the articles. Very impressive!