XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • P

      Restore only showing 1 VM

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      14
      1
      0 Votes
      14 Posts
      139 Views
      R
      The clue is in your own observation: re-enabling the disabled manual job made all VMs appear. The Backup Restore (V5) view likely filters its restore list based on which backup jobs are currently enabled, if a job is disabled, its associated VMs may not be indexed into the restore view even if backups from that job exist on the remote. This is different from how the older restore view worked, where it would scan the remote and show everything regardless of job state. The V5 restore view appears to be building its list from job metadata rather than from a direct remote scan. A few things worth verifying: Check whether the one VM that does appear is covered by a currently-enabled job, and the others are only covered by disabled jobs. If that pattern holds consistently, that's the root cause and it's a V5 behavior change worth reporting to the XO team. In the XO UI, go to Backup → Jobs and check which jobs are enabled. If you temporarily enable all jobs, does the restore list show all VMs? And when you disable some again, does it immediately drop those VMs from the list? If the behavior is confirmed, filing it against the backup v5 restore view filter logic would be useful, the restore UI should show all VMs that have restorable backups on the remote, regardless of whether the originating job is currently active or not. Given you're on a test branch focused on reactivity fixes, this could also be a rendering/state issue where the component isn't re-fetching when job state changes, the list gets built once and doesn't update until you navigate away and back.
    • P

      Distibuted backups doesn't clean up the deltas in the BRs

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      11
      8
      0 Votes
      11 Posts
      89 Views
      P
      @Pilow said: @ph7 try to put RETENTION to 1 in the schedule, as you are using LTR parameters I was running the shedule with 20 mins backup retention and it is running fine together with the LTR And here is the manual I ran at 14:56 removed [image: 1775140196713-screenshot-2026-04-02-at-16-28-13-backup.png]
    • M

      Mirror backup broken since XO 6.3.0 release, "Error: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'id')"

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      13
      1 Votes
      13 Posts
      164 Views
      P
      @Pilow perfect!
    • F

      XOA 6.1.3 Replication fails with "VTPM_MAX_AMOUNT_REACHED(1)"

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      4
      0 Votes
      4 Posts
      58 Views
      F
      I created a brand new Windows 11 VM with a VTPM and Secure boot enabled and am able to reproduce this on a freshly created VM. Initial replication will work. Any follow up replications will fail with Error: VTPM_MAX_AMOUNT_REACHED(1) Retrying the job after the failure will succeed.
    • A

      Backup retention policy and key backup interval

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      5
      3
      0 Votes
      5 Posts
      62 Views
      P
      @Bastien-Nollet why doni have weekly or monthly rétention points that are not fulls ? could not theses rétentions points be merged in fulls when tagged ? keeping a monthly incremental suppose to also keep previous inc. and based full
    • A

      XOA - Memory Usage

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
      7
      2
      0 Votes
      7 Posts
      272 Views
      P
      @flakpyro yup still aggressive on memory consumption I have a task that reboots XOA & XOPROXIES every two days to mitigate [image: 1775146146414-8e3474d6-3c71-4b21-bf1c-293fe13c61b8-image.jpeg] since 6.3 / 6.3.1 it seems more aggressive on the ramp up (I updated just yesterday... was still on 6.1.2)
    • C

      Is v8.3 NUMA aware?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
      3
      0 Votes
      3 Posts
      105 Views
      C
      If anyone can point me to documentation on this, I would greatly appreciate it. I have looked in the docs and searched for an answer and come up empty.
    • V

      iso modification and gpg key check

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Development
      3
      4
      0 Votes
      3 Posts
      44 Views
      olivierlambertO
      Nice catch @vagrantin ! Feel free to open a new thread if you have other problems.