XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • stormiS

      XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
      581
      1 Votes
      581 Posts
      283k Views
      A
      @rzr Updates installed everywhere (on top of the previous updates). Rolling pool reboot worked this time (with correct prep).
    • jgraftonJ

      CPU pegged at 100% in several Rocky Linux 8 VMs without workload in guest

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Compute
      17
      0 Votes
      17 Posts
      4k Views
      A
      @laszlobortel we've seen far less of this issue since my last message, not sure what made it better and when. But we're still making sure to reboot monthly (during patching, as we normally do anyways) + after live migration, and that helps. We don't use load balancing, so once a VM is staying put on one hypervisor, there is no issue. Live migration and time triggers the issue for us. What changed in our infra is upgrade to XCP-NG 8.3 and moving to XOSTOR as shared storage. We've seen no issue with AlmaLinux 9 and CloudLinux 9 at all. They also perform better I/O wise.
    • itservicesI

      XO Backup Error: VDI_IN_USE(OpaqueRef:.., destroy)

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      11
      2
      0 Votes
      11 Posts
      253 Views
      P
      @itservices Hi, We did not forget you, working on it!
    • SuperDuckGuyS

      Unable to create XOSTOR volume

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XOSTOR
      9
      1 Votes
      9 Posts
      547 Views
      poddingueP
      Thanks for coming back to close it out. That's useful to know. So I was plenty wrong, as it was the XOSTOR licensing backend rather than the repo side I guessed at; those -32000 errors really don't give much away. For anyone landing here later: sounds like -32000 on XOSTOR creation can come from either end, a licensing/entitlement issue that support sorts, or a host not reaching the package repo, so both are worth checking. @alcoralcor, did support get yours sorted too, or is yours still the repodata / repo-reachability one? Glad you're unblocked either way.
    • florentF

      Need FeedBack: New version of the File level restore

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      12
      2 Votes
      12 Posts
      350 Views
      florentF
      the new code is now in master
    • A

      Replication is leaving VDIs attached to Control Domain, again

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      11
      0 Votes
      11 Posts
      764 Views
      A
      @poddingue Since setting NBD=1, I have not seen the problem. SR is NFS on dual 40G ethernet with a TrueNAS scale 25.10 server using all NVMe SSD, so storage performance is as good as I can make it. I'll have to enable NBD=2 again to see if it still happens and if I can find the relevant part of the logs. As this is a random problem I can't recreate it on a normal test environment.
    • H

      Potential bug with Windows VM backup: "Body Timeout Error"

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      61
      3
      2 Votes
      61 Posts
      10k Views
      G
      @poddingue I need to update a few things and then I plan on trying to see if this was fixed for me. I think I only had 2 Windows machines that were a problem, and only on machines that had a larger disk and were basically empty. The counting zeros seemed to lead to a time out. Just haven't had the time to look at much of anything lately.
    • J

      Ghost PCI device - how to remove?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
      4
      0 Votes
      4 Posts
      99 Views
      poddingueP
      That leftover NIC is probably a stale PIF that XAPI is still holding, even though the card is physically gone, and the Refresh button re-scans rather than removing it. The docs have proper "remove a physical NIC" steps that end in forgetting the old PIF with xe pif-forget: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/networking/#remove-a-physical-nic. For the GPU side, the PCI passthrough flow (hiding the device from dom0, then assigning it) is here: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/compute#detaching-a-pci-device. If the GPU still won't show up as assignable once the stale PIF is gone, it might be worth a mention to @Team-Hypervisor-Kernel.
    • R

      cifs-utils LPE (CVE-2026-46243) / 8.3 dom0 vulnerability inquiry

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XCP-ng
      5
      0 Votes
      5 Posts
      345 Views
      R
      Closing the loop on this one — VSA-2026-021 went up yesterday (June 10) covering CIFSwitch / CVE-2026-46243: https://docs.vates.tech/security/advisories/2026/vates-sa-2026-021 A few things worth flagging for anyone following along: Severity landed at Moderate 🟠 — same ballpark as CopyFail/DirtyFrag, as Lucien anticipated. XCP-ng 8.3 and XOA both confirmed affected. XCP-ng 8.3 fix isn't in the main repo yet. The advisory notes there's a publicly available package with the fix, but it's not in the standard channel — Vates is asking people to reach out for the install procedure so you don't break future Rolling Pool Updates. So don't go hand-rolling the kernel commit yourself if you want to stay on the RPU path. XOA is already handled — fixed in Debian kernel 6.1.174-1, pushed via the unattended update mechanism. Just note the XOA VM needs a restart for it to take effect, and anything older than Debian 11/12 won't get the update and needs an OS upgrade first. Mitigation is unchanged from what we discussed: blacklist the cifs module if you're not using SMB-based SRs (which breaks SMB SRs, so only if you don't rely on them). Good turnaround given the disclosure-to-advisory window. Thanks again @LucienLassalle and the security team.
    • acebmxerA

      VHD Check Error

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      13
      1
      0 Votes
      13 Posts
      682 Views
      poddingueP
      Pilow's right that moving a VM to another SR forces one full pass while the CBT bitmap is rebuilt; that part is expected. But your screenshot actually shows the likely culprit for the all-VMs-fall-back-to-full pattern: you have Purge snapshot data when using CBT enabled, and XO's incremental backup docs flag exactly that combination as a known issue where you can occasionally get unexpected fulls: https://docs.xen-orchestra.com/xo5/incremental_backups#known-issues. It might be worth running a few jobs with that toggle off to see if the deltas hold. It is a known rough edge on the CBT side, so following the central CBT feedback thread and maybe a nudge to @Team-XO-Backend wouldn't hurt.