@pedro_udifar Hi, We think we have found two issues into one: can you test this branch please? It has the changes from previous branch you built: fix_throttled_stream This should fix the stream issue and fix the warning.

@olivierlambert said: On your backup remote, look at the file left behind by the failed run It's empty I increased the schedule to every 30 min. All 3 of them are OK [image: 1783076106533-ddfcf1d5-bae9-4a7a-b45d-64ba131fe80c-image.jpeg]

@yannsionneau I appreciate that. I will gladly provide access to the hardware if anybody in development wants to dig in and see what's going on.

@the_jest Not showen in this picutre but this is where the message would be displayed. Next to the name of the host... [image: 1782931263879-screenshot-2026-07-01-144023.png]

I'm having the same problem. The issue occurs with the XO config metadata backup.

Meant to update this again last night - as a road map for those who might try similar at some point: This community's documentation led me to some relevant information on mouse/keyboard pass-through. Namely, if you want this to work you have to pass the entire PCI controller through to the guest(s), Won't work with motherboard devices. But I'm out of PCIe slots. What to do... Simple. Chuck the two serial adapters and install two dual USB 2.0 adapters in their places. Connect the keyboard/mouse to one of the ports and a 4/8/16 port USB to serial adapter to the other. Then pass the entire controller through. In this particular server (R810) I have 5 available PCIe slots. Two will be used for the video cards, one for a 4x NVMe to PCIe adapter (which is eventually where the VMs will reside) and the remaining two for the USB interfaces. This effectively gives me two discrete physical systems, a third available VM instance (say, for network management, monitoring or whatever) and the XOA instance. For application/radio control systems hypervisors (nested) I'll probably have 2ea Win11 and whatever flavor of Linux that supports the GT730 GPU on the system - each assigned the pass-through devices - but only two running at any given time. So no resource contention issues. As far as the displays: I have the main interface of the server connected via SIP to a 2160AS KVM. I'll take 2 more SIPs and use these as the keyboard/mouse inputs for the USB cards. Video...I use an HDMI active splitter on other systems in the network so I'll employ that here. One of the ports on the add-in GPUs goes to the splitter, one of the splitter outputs goes to the SIP via HDMI to VGA adapter and the other feeds the main ceiling mount monitor. The Primary display will be replicated to the KVM screen. Resolution isn't an issue as I have a video scaler inline with the KVM for just this scenario. The concept could be expanded. I'm looking at picking up a T630 and building 4 effective "systems" out of it, following the same principle. The 630 has 8 available PCIe slots. Will update when the next batch of hardware arrives - or I get the Linux side of things sorted. That's next.

Hello @mgr42 I can confirm that indeed today AMD iGPU passthrough is not working on XCP-ng. I am currently (slowly) working on it. There are other references about this topic in the Forum and on GitHub FYI: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11918/amd-barcelo-passthrough-issues-any-success-stories https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/8909/issue-to-load-gpu-passthrough-invalid-pci-rom-header-signature-expecting-0xaa55-got-0x4556 https://github.com/xcp-ng/xcp/issues/806 https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api/commit/930ffb34e42d674b8234c3d8399fdba97efa6b38 On the setup I am working on, the Expansion ROM is provided indeed by firmware via the VFCT ACPI table. I dumped it to a file and provided it to qemu-dm xen-pci-passthrough device via the romfile= argument (via a modified XAPI build). I can now indeed see a ROM bar in the guest but unfortunately its content is not the content of the file therefore nothing works (amdgpu driver is unable to get its ROM and fails). So now I'm debugging qemu to try to understand the issue with the emulated/passed-through ROM BAR. Regards, Yann Kernel & Hypervisor team timemaster5 created this issue in xcp-ng/xcp open Unable to set romfile for xen-pci-passthrough devices #806 0 freddy77 committed to xapi-project/xen-api CA-418993: Enable PCI ROM BAR before attempting to give permissions to the VM Currently the VM is not able to access the ROM as the host ROM BAR is disabled and not set. Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@citrix.com>

Great! I think this is really the best possible approach to make it clean

@PessimistTech Let's try to see if we have errors in the logs. Run ls /boot/xen* and note the name of the xen file that ends with -d.gz Then, can you reboot and , while in the grub menu, edit the XCP-ng menu entry (the first one) and make the following modifications: modify the Xen ELF loaded by multiboot2 to load the debug Xen build by specifying the file that ends with -d.gz instead of /boot/xen.gz on the same line, at the end, add iommu=debug Then boot (by doing ctrl+X) and once booted and the VM with PCI passthrough started, please issue xl dmesg command in dom0 shell and report the content here. Also please paste the result of dom0 dmesg. then also an lspci -vvv -nn -s SBDF from both dom0 and the VM replace SBDF with the segment bus device function address of the device (beware it won't be the same in dom0 and inside the VM). Regards, Yann

@bvivi57 Hey, merci pour ce tuto ! Je vais comparer ce que tu as fait avec mes template que j'ai créer de mon coté. Si tu veux comparer, le repo est ici https://github.com/disruptivemindseu/xcpng-template-builder/tree/main

@olivierlambert Thanks for the response, much appreciated. I'm getting ready to file a bug report, as I noticed this morning that this issue is now causing a VDI-IN-USE error; preventing me from starting a VM. Fortunately, that VM isn't critical, so I want to report it and help with the troubleshooting that will lead to a fix before it spreads.

@Pilow no.

@dvdwx said: Hi Anyone already tried to review why Users with User permission cannot have the topology menu to edit on their Self-Service resource page? the have admin permission on their self service resource set but cannot edit this setting: [image: 1783021889506-620b892c-4c04-47ca-8425-064dbceee3e8-image.jpeg] [image: 1783021936003-28d03549-b715-44b6-966f-5d4a5a905825-image.jpeg] If i log with and full admin account on Xen Orchestra it can be edited: [image: 1783022030501-b4af0d96-e6c9-4aec-bd23-5b0869b9b31a-image.jpeg] We are using an HA Pool with 2 hosts to LAB for our NOC/SOC team. I already tried to create an ACL with user/tag/group with advanced permission but it release a full permission on the pool and it cannot be delivered to the team. if anyone know a workaround to fix it.. I appreciate that. As RBAC ACL is implemented for Xen Orchestra 6 you’ll likely find this more possible than currently on Xen Orchestra 5.

Ping @julienXOVates

Ping @julienXOVates

I'm doing some testing on my RAID since it appears to be a RAID VDR52: The consistency check found inconsistent parity data on Virtual Disk 1 on Integrated RAID Controller 1. Buffer I/O error on dev dm-9 Buffer I/O error on dev dm-5 Buffer I/O error on dev dm-7 async page read I will keep everyone posted

Thanks, I made the feedback to the XO team, this will be fixed ASAP.

Just to give an update. I still am having the issue with current commit 090ce. Regards, Marc