XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    130 Posts 37 Posters 9.8k Views 32 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K Offline
      kawreh
      last edited by

      In Ubuntu 24.04 VM with two PIFs: XO6 report the same IP addresses on VIF #1 as VIF #0. IPv4 and IPv6s on VIF #0 are reported correctly.

      XO5 reports both IPs correctly.


      Xen Orchestra, commit 7399a
      Guest tools 7.30.0-15

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • pdoniasP Offline
        pdonias Vates 🪐 XO Team @acebmxer
        last edited by

        @acebmxer Themes are in preview for now. Don't worry, persistency and other features will come after user management arrives in XO 6 🙂

        @fluxtor Do you mean that you edit the backup job through the API before running it?

        @aesparragon We're looking into that, thanks!

        @jacob.becker We're adding the maintenance icon very soon, thanks for the feedback. Regarding VM vs host in the treeview, do you mean that the icon isn't clear enough? Do you have the same issue with pools?

        @capeschools Indeed, updates are still done in XO 5 for now, we're trying to implement critical features first, but don't hesitate to upvote it on our dedicated platform if it's a priority for you: https://feedback.vates.tech/posts/11/add-xo-updater-tab

        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
        • A Online
          acebmxer
          last edited by

          As of commit - a3139

          VM creation in v6 number of cpu is set to 1 not what is chosen. I choose 5 cpus and 1 is set after creation. ISO is mounted now and Ram is set correctly with correct network.

          Still have issues with themes but did not se any mention of them in latest commits.

          pdoniasP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • marcoiM Offline
            marcoi
            last edited by marcoi

            I ran into backup failure this morning, I think someone else mentioned about it in another post. I went to check if there was a newer version of XO since usually things get fixed quickly. so I updated XO to build 9dbc09011.

            Few things

            • XO loads up now using interface 6 as default.
            • As someone else mentioned, about version is blank in v6.
            • When I click on V5 link it brings me back to V5 but its broken for me. Sits there saying loading.
              64c3b627-66b5-4bd7-8983-cacad2d897af-image.png
            • Havent tried using guide to go back to V5 to see why backup failed. Not sure if V6 has enough to figure out backup issue since i havent used it much.

            Update: looks like it failing to get something on v5 url.
            7fd5a824-1667-403d-81ca-f8f136679b42-image.png

            Update 2: I had to remove LISTEN_ADDRESS="" from my xo-install.cfg to get version 5 working again

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              jacob.becker @pdonias
              last edited by

              @pdonias said in 🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!:

              @jacob.becker We're adding the maintenance icon very soon, thanks for the feedback. Regarding VM vs host in the treeview, do you mean that the icon isn't clear enough? Do you have the same issue with pools?

              I don't have that many pools, sorry.
              The icon for each host got lost in a wall of VMs if you have lets say >50 VMs per host. AFAIK the tree-view allways starts fully expanded. Since all VM belonging to any host are on the same depth of the tree you can scroll over a host easy.
              Another thing are VMs which do not belong to a host - they are shown on the same depth as a host.

              I personally would color the line for a host, but i know that this not the way most design guidlines agrees with.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • pdoniasP Offline
                pdonias Vates 🪐 XO Team @acebmxer
                last edited by

                @acebmxer Thanks for the report, we'll check that! Regarding themes, it will remain non-persistent until we implement the full theme system.

                @jacob.becker Thanks for the detailed feedback, we'll see how we can improve that 🙂

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  MajorP93 @marcoi
                  last edited by

                  @marcoi Sounds like your issue is related to: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/9500

                  ronivay created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

                  open v5 interface doesn't work if hostname set #9500

                  marcoiM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • marcoiM Offline
                    marcoi @MajorP93
                    last edited by

                    yeah that was it, i removed the ip address from cfg file and it working now.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D Online
                      DustinB
                      last edited by DustinB

                      XO 6 (Enterprise) VM Interfaces shows incorrect IP address assignment on a given VM for a multi NIC VM.

                      XOA Version 6.0.3
                      2dc0dc0f-903e-4bbd-bac0-ade7dbf119ab-image.png

                      This shows correctly in XO5 Enterprise (and XOCE) without issue.
                      e9efc216-7326-4fd4-9e29-ff2160b7e577-image.png

                      The expanded view shows both IP addresses that are assigned to different interfaces, but it doesn't delineate nor show properly which IP address is actually assigned to the VIF. See below.

                      f41667d9-9de5-461e-af69-4598910b9e87-image.png

                      On VIF1, this nic is assigned to the 172.16.1.199 address.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        Nice catch! Thanks for reporting 👍

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post