XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    625 Posts 53 Posters 437.5k Views 73 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B Offline
      bufanda @rzr
      last edited by

      @rzr Installed on my 2 node lab pool, so far no issues.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • TeddyAstieT Online
        TeddyAstie Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team Xen Guru @Andrew
        last edited by TeddyAstie

        @Andrew said:
        HP DL G8 Intel E5-2673 v2 shows 64 CPUs. The actual CPUs show correctly, the higher ones (that don't exist) show [CPUxx] Unable to fetch temperature (19 - No such device)

        Machines with hotpluggable CPUs are a pretty tricky case, the logic tries up to "maximum possible CPU" and fails here because the CPU is not online (No such device error). That doesn't prevent the temperature from getting fetched for CPU that exists.
        I can try to add a check to hide this specific error, so it's doesn't create noise for offline CPUs on such machines.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • S Offline
          ScarfAntennae
          last edited by ScarfAntennae

          Temps seem to be working on i5-10500T:

          [11:46 delta-2 ~]# xenpm get-core-temp
          Package0: 57°C
          CPU0: 56°C
          CPU2: 57°C
          CPU4: 56°C
          CPU6: 56°C
          CPU8: 55°C
          CPU10: 57°C
          

          As this is my first time installing these update candidates, is there no other action required after doing:

          yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
          yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
          reboot
          

          Meaning I am not permanently in testing mode now? Next yum update should just pull the latest stable versions?

          rzrR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • rzrR Offline
            rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ScarfAntennae
            last edited by rzr

            As this is my first time installing these update candidates,

            Actually we moved first batch of packages that landed in testing to candidates repo, to avoid mix up in the second batch that just landed in testing repo. Since nothing new appeared in candidate you should probably already had them before, home this is clarifying what is actually happening 🙂

            Next yum update should just pull the latest stable versions?

            Not if you already have installed then from testing (or candidate) repo, because versions are same, it's only the distribution channel that change, no impact for testers.

            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @rzr
              last edited by stormi

              @rzr said:

              As this is my first time installing these update candidates,

              Actually we moved first batch of packages that landed in testing to candidates repo, to avoid mix up in the second batch that just landed in testing repo. Since nothing new appeared in candidate you should probably already had them before, home this is clarifying what is actually happening 🙂

              Next yum update should just pull the latest stable versions?

              Not if you already have installed then from testing (or candidate) repo, because versions are same, it's only the distribution channel that change, no impact for testers.

              I'm not sure what you understood from @scarfantennae's question, but that we moved packages from xcp-ng-testing to xcp-ng-candidates doesn't seem on topic here.

              The question is: "now that I've applied this update candidates from the testing repositories, am I definitively in testing mode?".

              The answer is: no, because:

              • The --enable-repo switch only applies to the two commands you ran: clearing the cache and applying updates. The repositories remain disabled by default, so yes, next time you update you'll only get stable updates if there are any.
              • Either the exact packages that you installed will be pushed as official updates (in which case there will be nothing for you to do), or we'll push newer updates that will supersede them automatically next time you update.

              Hope it's clear.

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • X Offline
                XCP-ng-JustGreat
                last edited by

                Updated my four host home lab pool with latest batch of updates with no observed issues.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • psafontP Offline
                  psafont Vates 🪐 XAPI & Network Team @rzr
                  last edited by stormi

                  @rzr We've found a regression in the VM revert with the new version of xapi (26.1.11)

                  The CD VBDs of the pre-revert are not removed when reverting, this means that the reverted VM usually ends up with duplicated VBDs for CDs.

                  We've verified a fix for it and we're integrating it as soon as possible. This means that this test cycle will take longer.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • S Offline
                    ScarfAntennae @stormi
                    last edited by

                    @rzr @stormi Perfect, thanks for clarifying!

                    rzrR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • rzrR Offline
                      rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ScarfAntennae
                      last edited by rzr

                      New maintenance update candidates for XCP-ng 8.3 LTS

                      This release batch contains fixes, and a security fix on an optional package,

                      Note: the two previous batches of updates has not been released yet, so if you haven't tested it, you will see more updates than described here when you'll install the update candidates. Refer to the previous announcements.

                      What changed

                      Virtualization & System

                      • kexec-tools: Update to sync with Xen Server:
                        • Add checks to reboot a crashed host if kernel crash handling doesn't complete.

                      Control Plane

                      • xapi: Fix the VM revert regression introduced in earlier "testing" version.

                      Optional package

                      • lldpd: Fix CVE-2026-46433, a buffer over-read when processing the "VLAN tags" from an Ethernet frame.

                      Versions

                      • kexec-tools: 2.0.15-20.1.xcp-ng8.3 -> kexec-tools-2.0.15-21.1.xcpng8.3
                      • xapi: 26.1.11-1.1.xcpng8.3 -> xapi-26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3

                      Optional packages:

                      • lldpd: 1.0.4-1.1.xcpng8.3 -> 1.0.4-1.2.xcpng8.3

                      Test on XCP-ng 8.3

                      Warning: XOSTOR users, refer to the instructions in the previous announcement, which apply here if you haven't installed the previous update candidates.

                      yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                      yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                      reboot
                      

                      The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

                      What to test

                      As usual, normal use and anything else you want to test.

                      Test window before official release of the updates

                      ~2 days

                      We would like to thank users who reported feedback since our last call for testing:
                      @Andrew, @ScarfAntennae, @XCP-ng-JustGreat, @acebmxer, @bufanda, @flakpyro

                      acebmxerA A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                      • acebmxerA Online
                        acebmxer @rzr
                        last edited by

                        @rzr

                        Updates applied...

                        Updated:
                          forkexecd.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                         kexec-tools.x86_64 1:2.0.15-21.1.xcpng8.3                           
                          message-switch.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                    qcow-stream-tool.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                      
                          rrdd-plugins.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                      sm-cli.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                                
                          squeezed.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                          varstored-guard.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                       
                          vhd-tool.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                          wsproxy.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                               
                          xapi-core.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                         xapi-nbd.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                              
                          xapi-rrd2csv.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                      xapi-storage-script.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                   
                          xapi-tests.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                        xapi-xe.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                               
                          xcp-networkd.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                      xcp-rrdd.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                              
                          xenopsd.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                           xenopsd-cli.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                           
                          xenopsd-xc.x86_64 0:26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3                       
                        
                        Complete!
                        

                        Will continue to test.

                        F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                        • F Offline
                          flakpyro @acebmxer
                          last edited by

                          No issues to report so far.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • A Offline
                            Andrew Top contributor @rzr
                            last edited by

                            @rzr Again, installed on several active pools. Running correctly for my use.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                            • X Offline
                              XCP-ng-JustGreat
                              last edited by

                              Applied the latest batch of updates with no apparent problems.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                              • B Offline
                                bufanda
                                last edited by

                                Applied patches yesterday, No issue seen until today.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • rzrR Offline
                                  rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                  last edited by

                                  We pushed the tested packages (of 3 batches) to the xcp-ng-updates repository, check blog post for summary and related advisories:

                                  https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2026/06/23/june-2026-updates-2-for-xcp-ng-8-3-lts/

                                  Thanks everyone for the tests!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                  • marcoiM Offline
                                    marcoi
                                    last edited by

                                    Applied the latest pushed updated to production, no major issues.
                                    The only thing to note is my backup XCP config failed Sunday, some time post the patches being applied. The error was the Body Timeout Error. This morning the backup ran without issues. Not sure why, but it wasn't a big deal and it working now. So not sure tied in with patching or not.

                                    rzrR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                                    • rzrR Offline
                                      rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @marcoi
                                      last edited by

                                      @marcoi said:

                                      Applied the latest pushed updated to production, no major issues.

                                      Thank you for testing

                                      The only thing to note is my backup XCP config failed Sunday, (...) This morning the backup ran without issues.

                                      Glad it has finally to work, if problem occurs again feel free to ask about this feature in this subforum:

                                      https://xcp-ng.org/forum/category/21/backup

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • rzrR Offline
                                        rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                        last edited by rzr

                                        XCP-ng 8.3 LTS Updated installer ISO

                                        The installer ISO has been refreshed with up date packages already published.

                                        The image can be downloaded from:

                                        https://repo.vates.tech/tmp/xcp-ng-8.3.0-20260709.testing.iso

                                        The procedure to install XCP-ng 8.3 remains the same.

                                        The refreshed installer ships updated Xen, Linux kernel and some drivers/firmware, which help with deploying XCP-ng 8.3 on hardware that needs changes introduced by updates not present in previous ISO image releases.

                                        This refreshed ISO has been validated on a subset of supported hardware. Additional testing on any hardware from the community would be greatly appreciated.

                                        As with previous installer releases, it can be used to upgrade XCP-ng from a previous major release (8.0, 8.1 or 8.2). Refer to the Upgrade documentation. For existing XCP-ng 8.3 installations, there’s no need to use this ISO image. Regular yum updates achieve the same results as a fresh installation with that ISO image.

                                        Installer improvements include minor enhancements related to software RAID1 support for the system disks, including support for more than 2 disks in the RAID1 array if anyone really wants that.

                                        New maintenance update candidates for XCP-ng 8.3 LTS

                                        This release batch includes a VBD leak regression fix in XAPI and minor changes needed to build the installer ISO.

                                        A regression was introduced to the VM.revert operation in xapi-26.1.4-3.3, which left VBDs attached to the VM when they are not present in the reverted-to snapshot (instead of destroying such VBDs, as was done before).

                                        VMs that were reverted to their snapshots after xapi-26.1.4-3.3 may have such "leftover" VBDs. Advanced users can use the leaked_vbds script to detect possible cases in your pools. Sadly, there is no way to automatically distinguish a VBD that was created after a VM.revert from a VBD that survived the VM.revert, so this script relies on the user to determine if the suspicious VBDs are indeed affected or not.

                                        What changed

                                        Control Plane

                                        • xapi: Fix non-snapshotted VBDs staying attached after VM.revert

                                        Versions

                                        • xapi: 26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3 -> 26.1.11-1.3.xcpng8.3
                                        • xcp-ng-release: 8.3.0-37 -> 8.3.0-38

                                        Test on XCP-ng 8.3

                                        yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                                        yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                                        reboot
                                        

                                        The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

                                        What to test

                                        As usual, normal use and anything else you want to test.

                                        Test window before official release of the updates

                                        ~5 days

                                        We would like to thank users who shared feedback since our last call for testing: @Andrew, @XCP-ng-JustGreat, @acebmxer, @bufanda, @flakpyro , @marcoi.

                                        acebmxerA F M 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • acebmxerA Online
                                          acebmxer @rzr
                                          last edited by acebmxer

                                          @rzr

                                          Just tried to apply update. Unable to put master host into maintenance mode - not enough memory...

                                          https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/106814

                                          Edit - Updated both host after manually migrating the vms. Also noticed when i thought i was updating the master host first it might not have been.

                                          With Twinstore installed and enabled HA was also enabled. After first host came back on line i looked at the pool advanced settings and saw host 2 was master not host 1.

                                          Both host have been updated and rebooted. @olivierlambert would this change post master from one host to the other? XO did loose access to the VMs while the first host rebooted. So i am alittle confused...

                                          Once host 2 came back online pool master is switched back to host 1 again...

                                          will look for any other odd things.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • F Offline
                                            flakpyro @rzr
                                            last edited by

                                            @rzr

                                            Is there something specific needed for the leaked_vbds script?

                                            When i run it i get:

                                            [09:37 xcpng-prd-01 ~]# ./leaked_vbds 
                                            Traceback (most recent call last):
                                              File "./leaked_vbds", line 23, in <module>
                                                snap = xapi.VM.get_parent(snap)
                                              File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/XenAPI.py", line 317, in __call__
                                                return self.__send(self.__name, args)
                                              File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/XenAPI.py", line 198, in xenapi_request
                                                result = _parse_result(getattr(self, methodname)(*full_params))
                                              File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/XenAPI.py", line 292, in _parse_result
                                                raise Failure(result['ErrorDescription'])
                                            XenAPI.Failure: ['HANDLE_INVALID', 'VM', 'Ref:29']
                                            
                                            
                                            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • First post
                                              Last post