XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @jivanpal
      last edited by

      @jivanpal If it persists, please open a new thread in the Xen Orchestra section of the forum.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        I just pushed a few updates to the xcp-ng-base repository for XCP-ng 8.3. Nothing really worth mentioning from the user point of view, so what matters is as usual to ensure no regressions are seen.

        F P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F Offline
          flakpyro @stormi
          last edited by

          After installing all the latest patches from this week my XOA and xe pif-param-list are both still showing network bonds linking at 0 b/s just like @rmaclachlan pointed out above.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P Offline
            ph7 @stormi
            last edited by

            @stormi
            In XO updated yesterday, it says: 6 missing patches. but in the patches tab i got no missing pathes ???

            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ph7
              last edited by

              @ph7 This happens when not all hosts in the pool are up to date. Could it be the case?

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Offline
                ph7 @stormi
                last edited by

                @stormi No, they are on the same patchlevel. Exept these released just resently.

                P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P Offline
                  ph7 @ph7
                  last edited by

                  @ph7
                  Eureka. I can see them now !!!

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P Offline
                    ph7 @ph7
                    last edited by

                    @ph7 Running rolling pool update.
                    This is really fun.
                    Love this project

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • L Offline
                      laurentm
                      last edited by laurentm

                      XenOrchestra (from source) update failed with the latest updates of XCP-NG 8.3.
                      I opened a topic in XOA forum, but I succeeded to update in XCP-NG 8.2, so the
                      error is coming from 8.3.

                      fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/': server certificate verification failed. CAfile: none CRLfile: none

                      Finally, I have bypassed the PFBlocker module during the update and no more error happened.

                      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • L Offline
                        lethedata
                        last edited by

                        ISO NFS can't seem to mount with an IPv6 address as it leads to a "DNS Error."

                        Error code: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_140
                        Error parameters: , Incorrect DNS name, unable to resolve.,
                        

                        sr-probe is able to find the target/paths and VDI SR NFS is able to mount using the same path. Tried with and without brackets but no success on the NFS ISO side

                        BenjiReisB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stormiS Offline
                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @laurentm
                          last edited by

                          @laurentm What's the dedicated topic? We can discuss there.

                          L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • BenjiReisB Offline
                            BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @lethedata
                            last edited by BenjiReis

                            @lethedata Can you share the command you're running and the corresponding SMlog?

                            Thanks

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • L Offline
                              laurentm @stormi
                              last edited by

                              @stormi

                              https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/8527/fatal-error-while-updating-xoa-installed-from-source/7

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C Offline
                                cunrun
                                last edited by

                                Just providing feedback:

                                Love the XO interface at the start, very helpful. Also, I do like the colour scheme. It turned a few heads in the datacentre the other day.

                                Using a Dell R740xd with 2 GPU's to pass through - Works fine and given the GPU's to a VM each (for 3D mapping).

                                After watching Lawrence Systems device passthrough vid, I managed to view a PUSB in the XOA via the host. I managed to pass it through to a Windows 10 VM but cannot see if in the device manager. Assuming that this still in beta stages so will try a different set of USB devices for testing but so far the Seagate RSS LLC_00000000NAB7AQ06 doesn't show in Windows.

                                d1968cbe-61a8-49a5-8efb-8555882cd738-image.png

                                65a2d246-e99c-4fa1-8d21-1173186052e2-image.png

                                752f246b-0c73-4c99-9f93-3729005f3d82-image.png

                                Happy to test further

                                J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • J Offline
                                  john.c @cunrun
                                  last edited by john.c

                                  @cunrun said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta 🚀:

                                  Just providing feedback:

                                  Love the XO interface at the start, very helpful. Also, I do like the colour scheme. It turned a few heads in the datacentre the other day.

                                  Using a Dell R740xd with 2 GPU's to pass through - Works fine and given the GPU's to a VM each (for 3D mapping).

                                  After watching Lawrence Systems device passthrough vid, I managed to view a PUSB in the XOA via the host. I managed to pass it through to a Windows 10 VM but cannot see if in the device manager. Assuming that this still in beta stages so will try a different set of USB devices for testing but so far the Seagate RSS LLC_00000000NAB7AQ06 doesn't show in Windows.

                                  d1968cbe-61a8-49a5-8efb-8555882cd738-image.png

                                  65a2d246-e99c-4fa1-8d21-1173186052e2-image.png

                                  752f246b-0c73-4c99-9f93-3729005f3d82-image.png

                                  Happy to test further

                                  Did you run a scan for changes (the icon of a monitor with a magnifying glass) in that Device Manager window? It will then check for new drivers to install and prepare for use. Prompting for device driver installation if required.

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • R Online
                                    ravenet @Andrew
                                    last edited by

                                    @Andrew said in XCP-ng 8.3 beta 🚀:

                                    @ravenet I did not have any problems with my Mellanox Connect-4 Lx card during upgrades from 8.2.1 (5.0 driver), to 8.3 (5.4 driver), then update to current 8.3 (5.9 driver), and then update to Xen 4.17.3. My card has the 14.32.1010 firmware. It is not used for the management interface. It is used by VMs and continued to keep the same ethernet name and function for the VMs.

                                    Thanks for testing

                                    I finally got around to updating the firmware on this Mellanox connectx-4 LX adapter. Bit of jumping through hoops to install tools, find proper firmware, but went from FW version14.18.1000 to New FW version: 14.32.1010. Had to do an emergency network reset again, but it's back.

                                    Obviously an incompatibility with the new 5.9 driver with much older mellanox firmware.

                                    AnonabharA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • AnonabharA Offline
                                      Anonabhar @ravenet
                                      last edited by

                                      @ravenet This worries me because I use the Connectx-3 cards in my setup. I wonder if I am going to run into the same problem or is it only a Connectx-4 problem.

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A Online
                                        Andrew Top contributor @Anonabhar
                                        last edited by

                                        @Anonabhar I don't think so as the ConnectX-3 is supported only in the older 4.9 drivers and not the newer versions (5.0 or 5.9 or newer). As all of these cards are old and EOL, it would be good to have the latest/last firmware installed anyway.

                                        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • X Offline
                                          xerxist
                                          last edited by

                                          Any reason why xcp-ng is focussing on back porting kernel drivers and fixes to an old kernel instead of using a newer kernel and porting back in what is needed for xcp-ng?

                                          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • C Offline
                                            cunrun @john.c
                                            last edited by

                                            @john-c Yeah, tried all of that. I get the same issue with older GPU's when vGPU'ing them. So I'm wondering if it's a setting on the Dell Server BIOS.

                                            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post