@Biggen At the moment, xcp-ng center provides some better views and overviews not yet available in XO.. Hoping next major version fixes this
Best posts made by Forza
-
RE: [WARNING] XCP-ng Center shows wrong CITRIX updates for XCP-ng Servers - DO NOT APPLY - Fix released
-
RE: Best CPU performance settings for HP DL325/AMD EPYC servers?
Sorry for spamming the thread.
I have two identical servers (srv01 and srv02) with AMD EPYC 7402P 24 Core CPUs. On srv02 I enabled the
LLC as NUMA Node
.I've done some quick benchmarks with
Sysbench
on Ubuntu 20.10 with 12 assigned cores. Command line:sysbench cpu run --threads=12
It would seem that in this test the NUMA option is much faster, 194187 events vs 103769 events. Perhaps I am misunderstanding how sysbench works?
With 7-zip the gain is much less, but still meaningful. A little slower in single-threaded performance but quite a bit faster in multi-threaded mode.
-
RE: Host stuck in booting state.
Problem was a stale connection with the NFS server. A reboot of the NFS server fixed the issue.
-
RE: Restoring a downed host ISNT easy
@xcprocks said in Restoring a downed host ISNT easy:
So, we had a host go down (OS drive failure). No big deal right? According to instructions, just reinstall XCP on a new drive, jump over into XOA and do a metadata restore.
Well, not quite.
First during installation, you really really must not select any of the disks to create an SR as you could potentially wipe out an SR.
Second, you have to do the sr-probe and sr-introduce and pbd-create and pbd-plug to get the SRs back.
Third, you then have to use XOA to restore the metadata which according to the directions is pretty simple looking. According to: https://xen-orchestra.com/docs/metadata_backup.html#performing-a-restore
"To restore one, simply click the blue restore arrow, choose a backup date to restore, and click OK:"
But this isn't quite true. When we did it, the restore threw an error:
"message": "no such object d7b6f090-cd68-9dec-2e00-803fc90c3593",
"name": "XoError",Panic mode sets in... It can't find the metadata? We try an earlier backup. Same error. We check the backup NFS share--no its there alright.
After a couple of hours scouring the internet and not finding anything, it dawns on us... The object XOA is looking for is the OLD server not a backup directory. It is looking for the server that died and no longer exists. The problem is, when you install the new server, it gets a new ID. But the restore program is looking for the ID of the dead server.
But how do you tell XOA, to copy the metadata over to the new server? It assumes that you want to restore it over an existing server. It does not provide a drop down list to pick where to deploy it.
In an act of desperation, we copied the backup directory to a new location and named it with the ID number of the newly recreated server. Now XOA could restore the metadata and we were able to recover the VMs in the SRs without issue.
This long story is really just a way to highlight the need for better host backup in three ways:
A) The first idea would be to create better instructions. It ain't nowhere as easy as the documentation says it is and it's easy to mess up the first step so bad that you can wipe out the contents of an SR. The documentation should spell this out.
B) The second idea is to add to the metadata backup something that reads the states of SR to PBD mappings and provides/saves a script to restore them. This would ease a lot of the difficulty in the actual restoring of a failed OS after a new OS can be installed.
C) The third idea is provide a dropdown during the restoration of the metadata that allows the user to target a particular machine for the restore operation instead of blindly assuming you want to restore it over a machine that is dead and gone.
I hope this helps out the next person trying to bring a host back from the dead, and I hope it also helps make XOA a better product.
Thanks for a good description of the restore process.
I was wary of the metadata-backup option. It sounds simple and good to have, but as you said it is in no way a comprehensive restore of a pool.
I'd like to add my own oppinion here. A full pool restore, including network, re-attaching SRs and everything else that is needed to quickly get back up and running. Also a restore pool backup should be available on the boot media. It could look for a NFS/CIFS mount or a USB disk with the backup files on. This would avoid things like issues with bonded networks not working.
-
RE: Remove VUSB as part of job
Might a different solution be to use a USB network bridge instead of direct attached USB? Something like this https://www.seh-technology.com/products/usb-deviceserver/utnserver-pro.html (There are different options available)... We use my-utn-50a with hardware USB keys and it has shown to be very reliable over the years.
-
RE: Citrix or XCP-ng drivers for Windows Server 2022
@dinhngtu Thank you. I think it is clear for me now.
The docs at https://xcp-ng.org/docs/guests.html#windows could be improved to cover all three options but also to be a little more concise to make it easier to read.
-
RE: ZFS for a backup server
Looks like you want disaster recovery option. It creates a ready-to-use VM on a separate XCP-ng server. If your main server fails you can start the vm directly off the second server.
In any case, backups can be restored with XO to any server and storage available in XCP-ng.
-
RE: Need some advice on retention
@rtjdamen you could simply make two backup jobs, one for daily backups and one for monthly backups.
-
RE: All NFS remotes started to timeout during backup but worked fine a few days ago
Since the nfs shares can be mounted on other hosts, I'd guess a fsid/clientid mismatch.
In the share, always specify fsid export option. If you do not use it, the nfs server tries to determine a suitable id from the underlying mounts. It may not always be reliable, for example after an upgrade or other changes. Now, if you combine this with a client that uses
hard
mount option and the fsid changes, it will not be possible to recover the mount as the client keeps asking for the old id.Nfs3 uses rpcbind and nfs4 doesn't, though this shouldn't matter if your nfs server supports both protocols. With nfs4 you should not export the same directory twice. That is do not export the root directory /mnt/datavol if /mnt/datavol/dir1 and /mnt/datavol/dir2 are exported.
So to fix this, you can adjust your exports (fsid, nesting) and the nfs mount option (to soft) , reboot the nfs server and client and see if it works.
-
RE: Netdata package is now available in XCP-ng
@andrewm4894 said in Netdata package is now available in XCP-ng:
Qq, what would be the best way for me to try spin up a sort of test or dev XCP-ng env for me to try things out on? Or is there sort of hardware involved such that this might not be so easy. In my mind I'm imagining spinning up a VM lol which probably shows my level of naivety
You can run XCP-ng inside a VM, as long as the hypervisor underneath exposes nested virtualisation. The actual installation of XCP-ng is very easy. Mostly click and run.
Latest posts made by Forza
-
RE: Advice on backup for windows fileservers
What are your needs for a backup? A full bare-metal recovery of the server/vm, or just some of the files on it?
If XCP-ng/XOA backups are too slow, why not separate the main data into a second disk mounted over iSCSI inside Windows. You'd still need to manage backups somehow though.
You mentioned open source. One option is https://www.urbackup.org/. We have been looking at it as a replacement for Acronis for bare-metal machines, but not yet made a decision.
If you just need to keep the files, you could easily make a script that creates a VSS snapshot and runs robocopy to some remote destination. I do this on several servers, and then I manage retention on the remote location separately.
-
RE: CBT: the thread to centralize your feedback
@Rhodderz said in CBT: the thread to centralize your feedback:
Is it possible to force a clean fresh start for the backups similar to Veeam "Active Full"?
Perhaps delete the snapshots for each vm. When backup job starts, it should be a 'full' backup.
-
Tag management for Storage not able to choose from existing tags
Hi,
It seems that it is possible to create custom tags for a SR, but the dropdown list does not allow for selecting other previously created SR tags. Perhaps the dropdown filters on the VM tags instead of SR tags? In any case I would like to have tags searchable from this list.
-
RE: Sum of actuall provisioned SR space compared to used space
I haven't seen it in XOA, but in XCP-ng Center, this information is available:
-
RE: Backup VM with active USB Dongle
@msupport we use the AnywhereUSB for this reason. Haven't tested the performance with USB disks, but it works good for all our license keys.
-
RE: Neofetch on XCP-NG
@Ascar said in Neofetch on XCP-NG:
@Forza Not a bash script, a package that requires installation. XCP-NG has all repos wisely disabled. That's why installing it on this specific type of host is not a trivial task.
Sure it is packaged for many distros, but it is just a bash script.
Neofetch is a command-line system information tool written in bash 3.2+
https://github.com/dylanaraps/neofetch
Neofetch only requires BASH, the rest of the dependencies are entirely optional
https://github.com/dylanaraps/neofetch/wiki/Dependencies
But to state what others already said, it is not recommended to install stuff in dom0.
-
RE: Citrix or XCP-ng drivers for Windows Server 2022
@dinhngtu Thank you. I think it is clear for me now.
The docs at https://xcp-ng.org/docs/guests.html#windows could be improved to cover all three options but also to be a little more concise to make it easier to read.
-
RE: Citrix or XCP-ng drivers for Windows Server 2022
@dinhngtu What do I do to install only the management agent for the Windows Update option? What file should I download?
-
RE: Citrix or XCP-ng drivers for Windows Server 2022
@dinhngtu OK, just to clarify; we have 3 different driver options?
- Windows Update - (What management tool should be installed, as this is not available in WU?)
- XenServer VM Tools - https://www.xenserver.com/downloads
- XCP-ng tools - https://github.com/xcp-ng/win-pv-drivers/releases
And that the "XenServer VM Tools for Windows 9.4.0" is the recommended version for now? Should then this checkbox be enabled or not?
The drivers/tools I have been using on all my Windows VMs so far is the "XCP-ng Windows PV Tools 8.2.2.200-RC1".