Subcategories

  • All Xen related stuff

    625 Topics
    6k Posts
    dkidd255D
    @JamesG, Yea i ended up having to go with a bare metal ubuntu install + docker containers for everything and have been off to the races, I would still like a hypervisor but unfortunately had to move on. The software stack on these intel's gpus is still maturing but i'm running some pretty impressive models on them and for the money it has been a good investment, hopefully these will gain some popularity and get better support all around. GPU hosting definitely deserves some attention from xcpng. I would buy some licenses for some production use cases but things like this and nested virtualization (completely unrelated but also something i ran into this past week) needs attention.
  • The integrated web UI to manage XCP-ng

    29 Topics
    367 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    The same as @john.c and also XO Lite tends to be less a priority because less critical than the full fledged XO (the priority is to replace entirely XO 5 in the next releases). Why you would need XO Lite outside basic actions? It's mostly meant to bootstrap XO itself and do basic operations (which is already the case, at least with many basic features already). Initially, the goal hasn't moved: replacing XenCenter. We are moving in that direction, but again, I think it's more important to get XO 6 finished first. I'm curious to understand more the use case of XO Lite in your context @unreal-shizzle ?
  • Section dedicated to migrations from VMWare, HyperV, Proxmox etc. to XCP-ng

    131 Topics
    1k Posts
    J
    @poddingue Thanks for taking a look. Yes it is this part that tells me that it should start the VM automatically once the import has completed. "After the transfer, the VM on XCP-ng side is started:" Followed by, "This process is fully automated, without any human intervention after it starts on step 1." [image: image.jpeg] https://docs.xcp-ng.org/installation/migrate-to-xcp-ng/ But my findings/experience is that the VM does not start once the import/transfer has completed. So either the docs are wrong. Or the function is not behaving as intended. I'm acctually fine either way. As long as I know what to expect. However, I would like to have it auto-start the VMs after transfer completion. Which would make the procedure "Fully automated". Update: Am I assuming correctly that "the XO V2V guide says to start the VM yourself once the migration is complete " you're reffering to, is part of the "test migration"-procedure? Not the acctual production mgiration? Because: "Final migration Run the production migration When you're ready for the final migration: Shut down the source VM completely. Start the V2V migration in Xen Orchestra with the Stop source option enabled. This ensures the final sync happens while the VM is powered off, and prevents any inconsistencies." In my mind doesn't state that the VM should be started manually post-transfer. Great thanks in advance for discussing! Cheers!
  • Hardware related section

    177 Topics
    2k Posts
    M
    Have there been any updates to this? I'm haven't seen any activity here for a while.
  • The place to discuss new additions into XCP-ng

    255 Topics
    3k Posts
    dicode-nlD
    New version: https://github.com/dicode-nl/xcp-ng-ceph-rbd/releases/tag/v20260903 This one includes native Ceph rbd SXM over SMAPIv3! GitHub updated with the latest commits and changes. As always, use with caution. I did run a lot of test scenario's but please do test yourself and let me know your findings!
  • Enable Maintenance Mode = Host Not Enough Memory

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    23 Views
    J
    @poddingue Huh.. Good catch. I set all of the VMs to restart, and now it does make maintenance mode possible, on the host. However, when we go into licensed/paid production (soon tm). It would be an absolute nightmare to try and find one VM that might not be on the right HA-plan... And it does kind of feel that Maintenance-mode should be compatible with whatever HA-plan is chosen regardless. Perhaps there could be a way to assign a global/pool-wide HA-plan along with enabling HA alltogether?
  • [SOLVED] Just FYI: current update seams to break NUT dependancies

    31
    0 Votes
    31 Posts
    8k Views
    F
    @Kajetan321 Hi, sorry. I am away from office and I can't tell you that off the top of my head right now. I get back to you during the week.
  • Reducing vCPU isn't done live on Windows

    Solved
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    123 Views
    olivierlambertO
    I wasn't even aware about this being a Windows limitation by itself
  • 1 Votes
    4 Posts
    172 Views
    dthenotD
    @samuelolavo Hello, Could the fact that this is a local LVM SR on a non-master host be relevant to how make_chain_rw is being handled? Yes, it's indeed what's happening. The check for the SRMaster (for a shared SR it's the master but for a local it's supposed to be done on the host directly) is failing and always saying False. I'll fix this. Thank you for the help
  • sr iso disconnect and crashed my hosts

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    3k Views
    H
    @olivierlambert We are still seeing similar issues on fully updated xcp-ng 8.3 host. We do reboot every time it happens. Is there anything we can do to fix this otherwise or prevent this from happening (beside manually disconnecting the cifs iso storage before the san goes for a reboot)?
  • `/run/sr-mount` parent directory created 0700 on some hosts, 0755 on others

    Unsolved
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    274 Views
    dthenotD
    @Dan Hello, So our investigation found that this change was introduced with commit https://github.com/xcp-ng/sm/commit/00637dd52e845d6016add9718fc9cc694aec9f0d It was aimed at EXTSR in particular, it appear that the first SR to be plugged is the one choosing the mode of sr-mount since util.makedirs also create the parent directory with the given mode. I have created a card for the issue on our side.
  • Nested virtualization - Prevent migration

    Unsolved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    108 Views
    No one has replied
  • VM Display Resolution

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    230 Views
    poddingueP
    It was too tempting not to test, so I went and tested the other half. On an 8.3 host I set the preferred resolution to 800x600 in the OVMF menu on a UEFI Debian VM, turned that VM into a template, and cloned it. The clone came up at 800x600. A control clone of the same original, with nothing set, came up at 1024x768. So your workaround holds, the resolution really does ride along into VMs built from the template. For anyone who wants to poke at it, the setting is a UEFI variable called PlatformConfig under GUID 7235c51c-0c80-4cab-87ac-3b084a6304b1. It only appears in NVRAM once you commit it in the menu, and it stores width and height as plain little-endian integers, which is why it travels with the VM record. One thing I didn't expect: the OVMF help text says the mode list is filtered against video RAM size, but the VM I used had the default 4 MB and still offered everything up to 1280x1024. So you may not need to raise videoram for the common ones. Fair warning though, I measured the console at the firmware stage rather than after the distro's own driver takes over, so a guest that sets its own mode later could still override it. At least, that's my understanding.
  • Smart Reboot blocked in XO, and no Rolling Pool Update

    Unsolved
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    567 Views
    D
    @poddingue said: What I can't tell you is what set that particular combination on your VM in the first place. Does it ring a bell? I have no Idea. I had it on "Protect from accidental shutdown" but turned that off again, later. Doing this again (on, off) helped, as you said. Thank you so much!
  • VM autostart stopped working

    Unsolved
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    695 Views
    O
    @poddingue Thank you for the analysis. I'd give you a rep if I could
  • Sudden boot issues, emergency shell, root-lfgrma does not exist

    Solved boot dracut
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    185 Views
    S
    After a good sleep, I resolved half of my issue. I got my LSI Cards messed up, I accidentally hidan internal LSI3108 (Address 01:00.0) instead of the PCI Card LSI3008 (Address 05:00.0)... My Boot Drives run off of the internal card. From the fallback kernel, I was able to Modify /etc/grub-efi.cfg to remove the internal card form the hidden list. I now have a separate issue, but will make another post.
  • Autostart behaviour after upgrade 8.2 -> 8.3

    Solved
    6
    1
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    464 Views
    poddingueP
    I put both of your questions on a spare host, because I couldn't answer either from memory. On colons: xe creates a key literally called auto_poweron:true with an empty value, so the entries you saw were three separate keys and none was the real auto_poweron, and typing false afterwards just made another one. It exits 0 and prints nothing every time, which I'd call a rough edge rather than a feature, though other-config is free-form by design so I don't know that the CLI is meant to validate keys at all. On the sleep: with rc.local executable and no sleep, it fired at 16 seconds of uptime and xe appliance-start came back with Error: Connection refused (calling connect ), exit 1, in under a tenth of a second. The VM stayed halted and nothing was reported anywhere, since rc.local has no terminal to print to. rc-local.service only orders after basic.target and network.target, nothing toolstack-related, while xapi-wait-init-complete.service took 30 seconds on that host, which is presumably why 60 was barely enough for you. There's an xapi-init-complete.target that looks like the right thing to order a unit against instead of guessing at a delay, though I haven't tried it so treat that as a lead rather than advice. The executable-bit half is in the docs now, it went onto the troubleshooting page after you reported it: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/troubleshooting/common-problems
  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    333 Views
    M
    Hard reboot sorted itself out
  • Get a price quote on a plan

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    193 Views
    DanpD
    Hi, I found your original request. I will make sure someone from the Sales team responds ASAP. Regards, Dan
  • CPU Usage of empty server

    Unsolved
    15
    3
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    marcoiM
    i think im seeing the same with fake cpu spikes. I started a second pool yesterday to patch and left it on over night. typically i just shut it down once done so the servers dont get too far behind patching. Under the pool stats im seeing spikes but under hosts nothing. It doesnt really bother me, but figure i add to the thread that im also seeing it. [image: c75fecec-d618-4f05-a931-edea6bc6ecce-image.jpeg] [image: 1b9ea5aa-d349-4ff8-af89-30a970d36fbb-image.jpeg] [image: 0f579999-cd96-4216-a0d4-d637ea5febf1-image.jpeg]
  • The Lowest Priority Bug Ever? (/etc/udev/rules.d/z10-xen-vcpu-hotplug.rules)

    Unsolved
    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    poddingueP
    Two PRs out of the lowest priority bug ever, that made my morning.
  • Unable to live migrate VM between 2 local storages SR

    Solved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    636 Views
    poddingueP
    I converted the topic to a question, then marked it solved. Thanks!
  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    858 Views
    gthvn1G
    PRs upstream are in review
  • Can't restart stopped VMs; unclear error message

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    989 Views
    acebmxerA
    @the_jest Not showen in this picutre but this is where the message would be displayed. Next to the name of the host... [image: Screenshot 2026-07-01 144023.png]
  • Start: no host available?

    9
    2
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    olivierlambertO
    For your storage question, it's fully explained in the doc: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/storage/#-how-to-modify-an-existing-sr-connection And yes, it's planned to get the complete error visible in XO, sadly, it's not "obvious" since the error message isn't returned by XAPI when you try to start but by another method we need to call after it fails ("assert can be started here" from the top of my head). Let me ping @julienXOvates