Subcategories

  • All Xen related stuff

    622 Topics
    6k Posts
    J
    @TeddyAstie I think there's alot of interest in the Intel platform because of the lack of ridiculous licensing for virtualization features. The problem is that you need a pretty current 6.x kernel to use them and XCP-ng/XenServer is just stuck on a really aging kernel right now. As exposed in this thread, the PCIe pass-through isn't really working properly under XCP-ng. Even if pass-through worked, that's kinda lame because the real purpose would be to chop up the GPU into SR-IOV instances so multiple workloads could have a GPU. The Proxmox community is already rockin' and rollin' with this. I watched a video a couple of days ago where a B70 was chopped up into Qty.4, 8GB GPU's via SR-IOV and passed to clients. No ridiculous mega-$$$$ licensing. It just worked.
  • The integrated web UI to manage XCP-ng

    30 Topics
    380 Posts
    tjkreidlT
    More options: to Prevent overwriting the file: Method 1: Probably the best option. Use a Configuration Directory. Modern OpenSSH versions (8.2+) support an include directive. This is the cleanest approach. Create a drop-in file: Put your custom settings in a separate file, such as /etc/ssh/sshd_config.d/custom.conf. The rule: Package updates will not touch files inside this directory. Verification: Ensure the line Include /etc/ssh/sshd_config.d/*.conf is active at the top of your main /etc/ssh/sshd_config file. Method 2: Lock the File (Alternative) You can force the filesystem to make the file immutable so nothing can change it. Lock the file: Run sudo chattr +i /etc/ssh/sshd_config Unlock for edits: Run sudo chattr -i /etc/ssh/sshd_config when you need to make intentional changes. Method 3: Tell Apt to Ignore Updates. If you are on a Debian-based system, you can force the package manager to always keep your local version. Add this line to /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/local: UCF_FORCE_CONFFOLD=true @stac00 Any progress or additional thoughts on any of this discussion?
  • Section dedicated to migrations from VMWare, HyperV, Proxmox etc. to XCP-ng

    128 Topics
    1k Posts
    acebmxerA
    If i recall from my migration I belive thats all there is to it. I know the docs mention about doing a test migration but mine just migrated and it just worked as you stated after making the needed adjustments. Let other chime in but i think you are good to go. And you could delete the snapshot from the vm.
  • Hardware related section

    174 Topics
    2k Posts
    gduperreyG
    @yllar Hello, We are still validating the ISOs, but we are getting closer to releasing them. We hope to make them available soon.
  • The place to discuss new additions into XCP-ng

    254 Topics
    3k Posts
    DanpD
    @rvreugde I believe this is already being reviewed internally.
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    715 Views
    olivierlambertO
    Really, you should because it would have prevent you this situation in the first place, but also some other future questions or problem you might have That's one of the few capital rules in XCP-ng world. Your master must ALWAYS be more recent than the slaves (or at the same level obviously), otherwise slaves won't be able to connect. I think you really need some assistance on best practices and such, please contact us so we can assist more generally. If this basic requirement is not understand, you might have other/deeper issues.
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    4k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Any of the host: if they are in the same pool, that's logical. Only the master is needed to be reach. XAPI will probably be in "Starting state" as long as all SR aren't plugged. If you have the SR on a VM on another host than the master, reboot the master only, you should be able to connect sooner Alternatively, check https://docs.xcp-ng.org/troubleshooting/
  • One VM forcibly restarts

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    richiebyteR
    On this one VM yeah, all other VM's have been fine with the Citrix tools. I am not sure if the tools change anything on the VM level once installed, as the problem did continue after attaching a fresh blank virtual disk to the problem VM.
  • Ubuntu VM struck at boot

    2
    1
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    728 Views
    planedropP
    How long have you waited for it? Like is it truly stuck or maybe just really slow to boot?