XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

Greg_E

I will recommend a local monitor you can attach during RPU to make sure you can see what's happening. You can also go into the IPMI console and watch.

I'm old school, I still have a KVM switch on my stuff and used it during a recent move from temporary building back to permanent home. XCP2 didn't start up as expected and I had some fooling around to do. The KVM is often quicker than the IPMI option for me.

Probably going to do this update in the afternoon when things slow down a little, didn't realize we had more high priority bugs to fix. Damn AI! Have a firewall update I need to get done, and need to check Windows for the Paint update (yes paint has an exploit).

acebmxer

@Greg_E

these are Dell servers and yes i was connected over ipmi and saw it sitting at the main console screen with no errors visitable. Before i decided to take action and disconnect and reconnect the pool.

Again next update I will wait longer. Usually they are fast to reconnect i know the remote pools tend to take little longer but. its hard to wait.

XCP-ng-JustGreat

@gduperrey @lmolina All, While I sympathize with @manilx 's point regarding the rapid-fire updates, we are living in the age of AI agent attacks at the inhuman speed of automation. With that in mind, I am personally appreciative of your zest for releasing critical updates as soon as possible. My security group released a compliance notice today regarding CVE-2026-98432 and I was grateful to be able to tell them that the fix had been released yesterday. Keep on keeping on, Vates!

Greg_E

@acebmxer
I did mine tonight over a remote connection, only took about 20 minutes total for all three hosts. If it's taking much longer then there might be something to look at.

I also used the slow externally connected XO sources box, which is pretty common for me when doing updates, that way the XO can't "get lost" as it migrates around the system. The external XO only has a gigabit connection, an old HP T630 with either 4gb or maybe 8gb of ram. That device has been in use since my first lab over 5 years ago, and still seems valuable.

rzr

@MajorP93 said:

Aaaaand it happened for the next VM.
Apart from updating XO I did not change anything...
It looks like RPU is failing on every single VM that has DMC enabled...
To me it looks like a regression

Hi, did you manage to sort it out ? if not your logs will help us to troubleshoot see related documentation as shared earlier:
https://docs.xcp-ng.org/troubleshooting/log-files/#produce-a-status-report

MajorP93

@gduperrey @rzr Hello!

Sorry for the delayed response and thanks a lot for raising that topic internally.

Due to these security patches being very critical/important I disabled DMC for all VMs that showed this issue (I think it was 6 Windows VMs) and patched the pool manually.

After that everything worked perfectly fine.

I wanted to react fast due to these security vulnerabilities and did not take the time to look at logs in /var/log etc.

Interestingly for the second update you guys published one day after (the kernel TCP vulnerability patch) RPU worked without any issues.

For now everything is stable and I will leave DMC disabled for these Windows VMs for now.

I was just suprised because this exact configuration, that included DMC was working stable for quite a few months.

However I can live without DMC on these VMs and am happy that everything is running stable.

Thank you very much for reacting fast on these security vulnerabilities!
I think you guys have a great process when it comes to this.

Best regards

lmolina

New maintenance update candidates for XCP-ng 8.3 LTS

This update is focused on security fixes.

What changed

edk2:
Sync with XenServer edk2-20220801-1.7.13. The update fixes vulnerabilities allowing an unauthenticated attacker on the local network to compromise a VM during PXE boot, or enable a guest VM administrator to bypass Secure Boot. See below the list of the corresponding CVEs:
- CVE-2026-97631
- CVE-2024-38796
- CVE-2024-38797
- CVE-2019-14560
- CVE-2022-36763
- CVE-2022-36764
- CVE-2026-45447
- CVE-2026-111497

Versions

edk2: 20220801-1.7.11.2.xcpng8.3 -> 20220801-1.7.13.1.xcpng8.3

Test on XCP-ng 8.3

yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
reboot # not mandatory but recommended for testing

The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

What to test

As usual, normal use and anything else you want to test.

Additionally, a cold boot (shutdown and start) of the UEFI VMs would also help testing the edk2 fix.

Test window before official release of the updates

About 4 days

We would like to thank users who shared feedback since our last call for testing: @acebmxer, @jr-m4, @bufanda, @flakpyro, @Andrew, @MajorP93, @JeffBerntsen, @manilx, @XCP-ng-JustGreat, @john205, @Greg_E.

We are aware of the frequency of these updates and strive to batch packages as much as possible. However, recent unplanned security updates require immediate attention. While drafting this message, we received another security update that we will release shortly.

acebmxer

@lmolina

installed updates no issues.... shutdown and cold booted windows 11 vm and a few linux vms no issues found.

Update - Applying the linux kernel update to work hosts now. The host 1 in Tilton pool took about 5 min to reconnect to xoa/xoproxy after console showed host booted. Host 2 swapped vms and started its update and rebooted. It took about 1-2 min to reconnect.

Host 1 does show more output prior to the console fully loading then compared to host 2. I did not get a picture of the output. When I can reboot host again will try to catch the output.

Andrew

@lmolina Update seems good. Booted all UEFI VMs normally. Booted Secure UEFI Windows 10 fine.

XCP-ng-JustGreat

@lmolina Latest update candidate edk2 fix applied without issue to my four host home lab pool. I tested one BitLocker encrypted Windows 11 VM with full shutdown and restart. What surprised me is that the VM booted back up fine. I was expecting that anything that changed the Tiano UEFI guest firmware might bork BitLocker unless it was suspended prior to applying the hypervisor host fix. (e.g. PowerShell Suspend-BitLocker -MountPoint "C:" -RebootCount 0 suspends BitLocker for an infinite number of guest reboots until it is explicitly resumed.) Apparently, this particular update doesn't alter any part of the guest firmware that causes a noticeable change to BitLocker. As a result, the boot volume unlocks and boots normally. Note that a firmware update on a physical machine generally is noticed by BitLocker. This is the reason the OEM's firmware installer suspends BitLocker with RebootCount 1 before performing the update's finishing reboot.