XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    784 Posts 64 Posters 982.0k Views 81 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      Greg_E @acebmxer
      last edited by

      @acebmxer
      I did mine tonight over a remote connection, only took about 20 minutes total for all three hosts. If it's taking much longer then there might be something to look at.

      I also used the slow externally connected XO sources box, which is pretty common for me when doing updates, that way the XO can't "get lost" as it migrates around the system. The external XO only has a gigabit connection, an old HP T630 with either 4gb or maybe 8gb of ram. That device has been in use since my first lab over 5 years ago, and still seems valuable.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Reply Quote 0
      • rzrR
        rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @MajorP93
        last edited by

        @MajorP93 said:

        Aaaaand it happened for the next VM.
        Apart from updating XO I did not change anything...
        It looks like RPU is failing on every single VM that has DMC enabled...
        To me it looks like a regression

        Hi, did you manage to sort it out ? if not your logs will help us to troubleshoot see related documentation as shared earlier:
        https://docs.xcp-ng.org/troubleshooting/log-files/#produce-a-status-report

        1 Reply Last reply
        Reply Quote 0
        • M
          MajorP93 @gduperrey
          last edited by MajorP93

          @gduperrey @rzr Hello!

          Sorry for the delayed response and thanks a lot for raising that topic internally.

          Due to these security patches being very critical/important I disabled DMC for all VMs that showed this issue (I think it was 6 Windows VMs) and patched the pool manually.

          After that everything worked perfectly fine.

          I wanted to react fast due to these security vulnerabilities and did not take the time to look at logs in /var/log etc.

          Interestingly for the second update you guys published one day after (the kernel TCP vulnerability patch) RPU worked without any issues.

          For now everything is stable and I will leave DMC disabled for these Windows VMs for now.

          I was just suprised because this exact configuration, that included DMC was working stable for quite a few months.

          However I can live without DMC on these VMs and am happy that everything is running stable.

          Thank you very much for reacting fast on these security vulnerabilities!
          I think you guys have a great process when it comes to this.

          Best regards

          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply Quote 3
          • lmolinaL
            lmolina Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by lmolina

            New maintenance update candidates for XCP-ng 8.3 LTS

            This update is focused on security fixes.

            What changed

            • edk2:
              Sync with XenServer edk2-20220801-1.7.13. The update fixes vulnerabilities allowing an unauthenticated attacker on the local network to compromise a VM during PXE boot, or enable a guest VM administrator to bypass Secure Boot. See below the list of the corresponding CVEs:

              • CVE-2026-97631
              • CVE-2024-38796
              • CVE-2024-38797
              • CVE-2019-14560
              • CVE-2022-36763
              • CVE-2022-36764
              • CVE-2026-45447
              • CVE-2026-111497

            Versions

            • edk2: 20220801-1.7.11.2.xcpng8.3 -> 20220801-1.7.13.1.xcpng8.3

            Test on XCP-ng 8.3

            yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
            yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
            reboot # not mandatory but recommended for testing
            

            The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

            What to test

            As usual, normal use and anything else you want to test.

            Additionally, a cold boot (shutdown and start) of the UEFI VMs would also help testing the edk2 fix.

            Test window before official release of the updates

            About 4 days

            We would like to thank users who shared feedback since our last call for testing: @acebmxer, @jr-m4, @bufanda, @flakpyro, @Andrew, @MajorP93, @JeffBerntsen, @manilx, @XCP-ng-JustGreat, @john205, @Greg_E.

            We are aware of the frequency of these updates and strive to batch packages as much as possible. However, recent unplanned security updates require immediate attention. While drafting this message, we received another security update that we will release shortly.

            acebmxerA A X 3 Replies Last reply
            Reply Quote 2
            • acebmxerA
              acebmxer @lmolina
              last edited by acebmxer

              @lmolina

              installed updates no issues.... shutdown and cold booted windows 11 vm and a few linux vms no issues found.

              Update - Applying the linux kernel update to work hosts now. The host 1 in Tilton pool took about 5 min to reconnect to xoa/xoproxy after console showed host booted. Host 2 swapped vms and started its update and rebooted. It took about 1-2 min to reconnect.

              Host 1 does show more output prior to the console fully loading then compared to host 2. I did not get a picture of the output. When I can reboot host again will try to catch the output.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Reply Quote 3
              • A
                Andrew Top contributor @lmolina
                last edited by

                @lmolina Update seems good. Booted all UEFI VMs normally. Booted Secure UEFI Windows 10 fine.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Reply Quote 1
                • X
                  XCP-ng-JustGreat @lmolina
                  last edited by XCP-ng-JustGreat

                  @lmolina Latest update candidate edk2 fix applied without issue to my four host home lab pool. I tested one BitLocker encrypted Windows 11 VM with full shutdown and restart. What surprised me is that the VM booted back up fine. I was expecting that anything that changed the Tiano UEFI guest firmware might bork BitLocker unless it was suspended prior to applying the hypervisor host fix. (e.g. PowerShell Suspend-BitLocker -MountPoint "C:" -RebootCount 0 suspends BitLocker for an infinite number of guest reboots until it is explicitly resumed.) Apparently, this particular update doesn't alter any part of the guest firmware that causes a noticeable change to BitLocker. As a result, the boot volume unlocks and boots normally. Note that a firmware update on a physical machine generally is noticed by BitLocker. This is the reason the OEM's firmware installer suspends BitLocker with RebootCount 1 before performing the update's finishing reboot.

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  Reply Quote 2
                  • D
                    dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @XCP-ng-JustGreat
                    last edited by dinhngtu

                    @XCP-ng-JustGreat Windows VMs will pass the Measured Boot check even after an edk2 update if BitLocker is set up to only use Secure Boot for integrity validation (see the "Configure TPM platform validation profile for native UEFI firmware configurations" policy, PCRs 7 and 11)

                    X 1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply Quote 2
                    • X
                      XCP-ng-JustGreat @dinhngtu
                      last edited by XCP-ng-JustGreat

                      @dinhngtu Thank you for bringing the TPM platform validation profile to my attention. I see that there is yet another nuance to the firmware boot process I didn't fully understand. I'm going to dig into those TPM group policies to see what that's all about. (Later on . . .) Found them, here:
                      image.jpeg

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply Quote 0
                      • vxgmichelV
                        vxgmichel Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                        last edited by

                        New kernel version in xcp-ng-testing for the next XCP-ng 8.3 LTS security update

                        We're adding a new kernel version to the security update we're planning for tomorrow.

                        What changed

                        • kernel:
                          • Security fixes in the Xen netback and blkback drivers, XSA-526, XSA-527 and XSA-528.
                          • Synchronization with XenServer release 4.19.19-8.0.49. In this release, the XCP-ng patches for CVE-2026-98432 (possible race condition occurring during concurrent processing of re-transmitted TCP connection requests) have been removed as they are now part of the XenServer release. Also included are patches for CVE-2026-31431, a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's cryptographic interface known as "Copy Fail" that could allow unprivileged accounts to gain root privileges. As a mitigation, the authencesn module was disabled in the previous XCP-ng kernel release. It is now re-enabled. Finally, it includes patches for CVE-2021-47103, a use-after-free vulnerability in the TCP IP protocol.
                          • Fixes for the following CVEs are also included:
                            • CVE-2026-31659
                            • CVE-2026-31678
                            • CVE-2026-43502
                            • CVE-2026-52912
                            • CVE-2026-52923
                            • CVE-2026-52924
                            • CVE-2026-68376
                            • CVE-2026-74480
                            • CVE-2026-74957
                            • CVE-2026-80714
                            • CVE-2026-52929
                            • CVE-2026-63834
                            • CVE-2026-43042
                            • CVE-2026-72255

                        Versions

                        • kernel: 4.19.19-8.0.46.14.xcpng8.3 -> 4.19.19-8.0.49.3.xcpng8.3

                        Test on XCP-ng 8.3

                        yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                        yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                        reboot
                        

                        The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

                        What to test

                        As usual, normal use and anything else you want to test.

                        Test window before official release of the updates

                        1 day

                        We would like to thank users who shared feedback since our last call for testing:
                        @acebmxer, @Andrew, @XCP-ng-JustGreat

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post