@yllar I'm not sure honestly (I will have to ask the rest of the team), but anyway, even if it were fixed by latest xen package, we still didn't publish a new installer ISO with the fix. Target is still around June for the new ISO. Regards, Yann

@pierrebrunet I inadvertently found more information yesterday. I installed an old e492b commit on a new machine, configured identically to the original, and got a different error but the same effect. The new error is: xcp xo backup Error: read ETIMEDOUT That lead me to this page: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/10799/backup-timeout-error I moved the XO machine onto the same subnet as XCP, leaving the storage behind in a different network. This fixed the issue, at least on commit e492b ... I have not yet tried it on the new release... however I am pretty confident it will be successful. If I'm honest, I think this is a tuning issue between XO and XCP. XO is now mounting an NFS share across this subnet boundary and that mount is not having any sort of performance issue, but for some reason XO times out transferring the same data from dom0? That seems off to me. It's not a probem moving XO to the other subnet, so I've done that, but maybe this deserves a look in the future.

Hi @jedimarcus, FYI, VIF creation is possible via the REST API POST /rest/v0/vifs

Because it works already better than the GO tool from Citrix… There's no urgent fix to do, I personally use it in my production since it's available. It's just less a priority for extra features because it's already ultra stable. Right now, we choose to work in priority on XCP-ng 9.0 than the Rust tools, we can't do everything at once yet.

@simonp said: @acebmxer Hi, Thanks to your help we were able to identify an issue with Redis that we think is the source of the v6 dashboard loading issue. Could you try and checkout the fix_redis_encryption_issue branch, rebuild xo and restart ? This should solve the 401 issues. Switched back to Master branch and made some changes to my install script. add diagnostics for missing XO 6 web UI build artifacts Plain bash [[ -f ]] fails silently on unreadable paths owned by SERVICE_USER, causing false-positive missing-artifact warnings. Switch all file/dir tests and grep calls to use sudo. SUCCESS] Xen Orchestra built successfully [INFO] Build verification passed: dist — all JS chunks present. [INFO] Build verification passed: dist — all JS chunks present. [INFO] Creating systemd service... [SUCCESS] Systemd service created and enabled [INFO] Configuring sudo for xo-service (mount/umount/findmnt)... [SUCCESS] Sudo configured for xo-service (mount, umount, findmnt) [INFO] Applying security hardening... [INFO] Starting xo-server service... [INFO] Waiting for Xen Orchestra to become ready (up to 60s)... [INFO] Not ready yet (attempt 1/10), retrying in 6s... [SUCCESS] Xen Orchestra is ready (HTTPS on port 443) [SUCCESS] Update completed successfully! [INFO] New commit: 0f29421627c7 v6 Dashboard still loading correctly. Thank you for the fix.

@abudef An overhaul of the guest agent is coming. We're considering adding some kind of update notifications as part of that overhaul, but it'll take some time to suss out the details. Autoupdating the Xen drivers is potentially disruptive and I'd prefer avoiding outages arising from an update coming at a bad time.

@maximsachs Thanks for getting back to me on this. I think (and hope) that in the mean time we will have released an official new ISO that fixes the issue you are having. So, you will be better off testing the new official ISO rather than this unofficial one I'll try to ping here when the new official ISO is out. Thanks! Regards, Yann

Thank you all (@olivierlambert , @teddyastie ) for your valuable responses

@florent said: @acebmxer back to work thank you for yor patience and help on this. I feel that it's not the same issue , with abrupt increase W will try our best to also fix this one Yes i replied to ticket also.... Yes you can do what is needed to XOA. Just looked at memory and it dropped.... [image: 1779875710969-screenshot_20260527_055458.png]

@olivierlambert Thanks again for your input and recomendations! I'll verify that this is solved by having the LUN expanded to 8GB instead. Afterwards I'll mark your answer as the solution!

@tjkreidl I found that some Intel PRO GPU card have SRV-IO without any additional license, but this functionality is supported in Linux kernel 6.12 and up. I hope in new XCP-NG will have 6.12+ and support GPU sharing.

@iams3le we have switched to the signed xcp-ng drivers. We also replaced our older 2022 servers.

@MajorP93 that’s fine - I never use ballooning anyway so I guess I am covered good

@Rod-G These have 9.4.2-xxxx and I need to go through and update everything now that I see how far behind I am. the second VM completed fine after its reboot, something was just stuck in a dirty state and got in the way of the import or health check.

I'm not positive, but this may be available RSN in xo-lite.

@tonyp90 great, thanks !

@florent said: where does this disk comes from From my Redhat 10 @florent said: if you have access to your SR from the outside, you can also put the qcow2 file directly I create a VM to be a NFS to access the 3 HDs, the qcow disks are on the Redhat 10 that I was trying to import from. Do you mean I put the qcow disks on one of the HDs and access them when I create a VM?

@Danp fully patched 8.3 (through the most recent May patches). XO commit d810e (master commit e3a58). I usually update XO around the first of each month; so it's a little bit behind master. There are crash logs in /var/crash. I can provide a log bundle if needed, or copy/paste some info here if I know what to provide.

Thanks for the clarification, @dsmteam !

The sr.scan-driven SMlog growth angle that gumbo2k surfaced is a real lead; there's some context in the storage-related log files reference, but the docs don't go as far as "here's how to throttle it safely on a pool where the underlying disks should spin down." Soft ping to @Team-Storage and @Team-Hypervisor-Kernel: could one of you weigh in on whether other-config:auto-scan=false on the SR is the supported way to reduce scan pressure, or if there's a better lever? I don't want to send anyone down a path that breaks an SR. Apologies if this has already been answered somewhere I haven't seen.