@jerry1333 said: There is nothing else on that host and this is only host in pool but it's using 30% of cpu all the time? it's not using 30% of CPU, you see a graph of cumulated (switch is on) core consumption of your 32 cores. never switch this on. it adds up like that : 32x1%=32%, wrongfully letting you think you are at 30%ish CPU usage.

If you're looking for a quick way to verify those files without running a full restoration test every single time, you can usually run a checksum comparison (MD5 or SHA256) against the original data. For a more 'point and click' approach to double-check specific files or verify hashes quickly, I've used https://thetoolapp.com/utilities/file-integrity-checker/ before. It’s pretty handy for a quick integrity check if you aren't in the mood to mess around with the command line for every single backup set.

Hello @tsukraw , normally your client should be able to bind the new license on their XOA. BTW, you talk about binding the license to a pool but an XOA license is bound to an XOA. I suggest your customer open a support ticket so we can help them with that issue.

For my reference later. wget http://downloads.hpe.com/pub/softlib2/software1/pubsw-linux/p1257348637/v76502/hpacucli-9.20-9.0.x86_64.rpm yum install -y --nogpgcheck hpacucli-9.20-9.0.x86_64.rpm hpacucli controller slot=0 physicaldrive all show

Hi @Pilow, Thanks for the report. We are aware that there are many problems with the FLR. We would like to fix them but they are not easy to fix, and we can't give an estimation date for a fix. I've linked this topic to our investigation ticket. For the moment, when FLR fails, we recommend to manually restore your files by following this documentation: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/blob/master/%40vates/fuse-vhd/README.md#restore-a-file-from-a-vhd-using-fuse-vhd-cli

@TheNorthernLight Thanks for pointing that out, that totally makes sense, I should have realized to look it up that way. I guess I just think of XCP-ng as its own product so much that I forget it's based on Xen even though I know that.

@DustinB thank you! I suspected as much, but as my wife points out all the time, I am terrible at finding things, so I figured I would ask.

@geometry game 2 This usually happens when dependencies are out of sync after pulling updates. Did you try removing node_modules and the lock file and then running yarn install again before starting XO?

@simonp - Can you reshare the dashboards. The link says json is not available for any of these dashboards,

La remarque a été intégrée dans l'article: https://www.myprivatelab.tech/xcp_lab_v2_ha#perte-master Merci encore pour le retour.

I've seen this happen after a BIOS update or if a CMOS battery starts failing. Sometimes the motherboard resets to 'Legacy' instead of 'UEFI' (or vice versa), and GRUB just loses its mind because it can't find the partition it expects. It’s worth a quick check in your firmware settings to make sure the boot mode and the drive order haven't shifted on you.

Support tunnel is active but I have troubles to access support "Oops, something went wrong! Don't worry, our team is already on it". I'll keep trying, thanks.

That is a frustrating loop to be in, especially with TrueNAS. Usually, when the VM fails to start after a change, it’s because XCP-ng is trying to pass through a PCI device (like an HBA) that isn't being released properly by the host. Have you checked if the "hide" parameters in your grub config are still correct? Sometimes an update can reset those, and the host grabs the controller before the VM can. Another thing to try is toggling the BIOS/UEFI mode in the VM settings - TrueNAS can be picky about that depending on which version you’re running.

@florent I can confirm that this fixes the issue!

Nevermind. I forgot your previous post about: You'll need to modify two files (via SSH): /opt/dell/omc/utilities/tui/bin/ome_disk_config.sh /opt/dell/mcsi/appliance/scripts/appliance_ressource.sh In these files, replace /dev/sd with /dev/xvd. I went and made these changes, and now the Data drive is loading after doing the drive scan. I should mention that doing this BEFORE first logging into the OME web interface and completing the initialization seems to be best (no further errors appear once logged in).

@Pilow The backups kept by LTR are just regular backups with a specific tag, which doesn't change how we treat them. If you want to avoid each of your LTR backup to depend on one another, we recommend to set a full backup interval value to your backup job, which will regularly force a full backup. (even without LTR, having an infinite chain of backups can cause problem in the long term, especially if no healthchecks are made)

@MathieuRA said: Hi, regarding your backups which do not appear on the XO5 restore page, I suggest you to open a new topic Forgot to include the link to the new topic https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/12040/restore-only-showing-1-vm

Nice catch @vagrantin ! Feel free to open a new thread if you have other problems.

@Pilow said: @ph7 try to put RETENTION to 1 in the schedule, as you are using LTR parameters I was running the shedule with 20 mins backup retention and it is running fine together with the LTR And here is the manual I ran at 14:56 removed [image: 1775140196713-screenshot-2026-04-02-at-16-28-13-backup.png]

@Pilow perfect!