XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    84 Posts 27 Posters 5.0k Views 23 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M Offline
      manilx @skipthompson81
      last edited by manilx

      Just did my RPU and checked on the new v6 interface.
      The old one has task details that are missing on the new one (or I didn't find them:

      ScreenShot 2025-12-19 at 09.36.54.png
      ScreenShot 2025-12-19 at 09.37.00.png

      I like to see the evacuation tasks happening (in the past I could identify hangs etc)

      Here instead of the ID of the VM host the real names should be shown:
      ScreenShot 2025-12-19 at 09.55.11.png

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        manilx @manilx
        last edited by

        As shown above the evacuation tasks are not shown.
        The last steps migrating thre VM's to the original place are shown:
        ScreenShot 2025-12-19 at 09.56.44.png

        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          manilx @manilx
          last edited by

          Also here the task progression can't be followed (stays at 0% until completed):
          ScreenShot 2025-12-19 at 10.01.37.png
          instead of
          ScreenShot 2025-12-19 at 10.01.28.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • K Offline
            kubuntu-newbie
            last edited by

            I can't seem to find User settings to change admin name/password or configure filters. and they are not in the obvious place - account settings in top right corner.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G Offline
              Greg_E
              last edited by

              Trying not to be negative, but I hate having to jump back to v5 to get things done.

              olivierlambertO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO @Greg_E
                last edited by

                @Greg_E This is only until we get more features directly into XO 6. Our goal was th get feedback ASAP without waiting again for months and something entirely finished (to finally realize it's not the right way and lose another year).

                If you don't want to test XO 6 and report what's missing first for you, you can configure your instance to be on XO 5 by default and switch later 🙂

                G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G Offline
                  Greg_E @olivierlambert
                  last edited by

                  @olivierlambert

                  The odd part is that I'm happy with XO Lite, so not sure why 6 is causing me problems other than needing g to jump back to 5. I only have one XO new enough to be updated, I guess I need to update my lab since I'm in it a lot lately and come up with more productive comments for the team. The switch just immediately shocked me in a way that it shouldn't have done being that I've been using Lite to try and get ready.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    That's also because XO Lite is replacing basically "nothing before", while XO 5 is 10y full of features that we can't all re-implement at once in XO 6 🙂

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Tristis OrisT Offline
                      Tristis Oris Top contributor
                      last edited by

                      Tasks still show completed actions, a month ago events.

                      715d5ed4-fba3-4ae2-86a1-e878ecd90bc9-изображение.png

                      No way to install updates. New ui less informative than the old one - no packages changelog.

                      173a0295-06a0-4eee-a064-ba4f482962ef-изображение.png

                      It also take a time to get into new navigation. Instead of static categories at sidebar, now i can't open Backup while inside pool settings. Need to do extra clicks.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        @tristis-oris

                        See https://feedback.vates.tech/?tags=xo-6 (updates are planned already)

                        For the rest, if it's a feedback that's not there and not a bug, feel free to add it 🙂

                        MathieuM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • MathieuM Offline
                          Mathieu @olivierlambert
                          last edited by

                          Has anyone tried to access XO 6 via a reverse proxy?
                          I'm using nginx proxy manager in a docker container to access my XO instance.
                          Everything is working fine with XO5 (both XOCE and XOA).
                          But when trying to access XO6 through the reverse proxy, it shows only a few info, with a circle loading on the top and nothing on the left bar:
                          7c0cc74d-19cc-4a9e-858a-f53913c654c6-image.png

                          If I access XOCE and XOA v6 by their IP address, it's working as expected.

                          Websocket support and cache is activated on the reverse proxy, nothing else fancy on that side.

                          Thanks.

                          P A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P Offline
                            probain @Mathieu
                            last edited by probain

                            @Mathieu said in 🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!:

                            Has anyone tried to access XO 6 via a reverse proxy?
                            I'm using nginx proxy manager in a docker container to access my XO instance.
                            Everything is working fine with XO5 (both XOCE and XOA).
                            But when trying to access XO6 through the reverse proxy, it shows only a few info, with a circle loading on the top and nothing on the left bar:
                            7c0cc74d-19cc-4a9e-858a-f53913c654c6-image.png

                            If I access XOCE and XOA v6 by their IP address, it's working as expected.

                            Websocket support and cache is activated on the reverse proxy, nothing else fancy on that side.

                            Thanks.

                            I haven't tried ngnix. But I access my though haproxy:443 - > xo:8443. And that works just fine. But there needed to be a couple of fixes upstream in master to iron out the quirks with non-443 ports and such.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A Offline
                              acebmxer @Mathieu
                              last edited by

                              @Mathieu I do use NGINX Proxy Manager and i have no issues accessing XO-CE via the new v6 default or the old v5 with working links.

                              As @probain has stated there have been quite a few updates pushed to fix most issues. My issues were related to the script i used to install XO-CE. The script creator had to update the script to the recent changes made.

                              Make sure you are on the latest commit and/or update your script and try again.

                              MathieuM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • MathieuM Offline
                                Mathieu @acebmxer
                                last edited by

                                @acebmxer
                                I found the culprit:

                                HTTP/2 support needs to be enabled on the SSL tab of npm for v6 to work fine behind the reverse proxy.

                                It's now working fine.

                                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • A Offline
                                  acebmxer @Mathieu
                                  last edited by

                                  @Mathieu ok. Yeah I already had that enabled. Glad you got it working.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • P Offline
                                    probain
                                    last edited by probain

                                    Windows guests Console - Reloads every 5-10s.

                                    When trying to use the console for both my Windows 11 and Server 2025. The console reloads every 5-10s. This makes it borderline unusable. Since it resets the viewport/window scroll placement as well. Also the console seems to loose focus when this happens as well. Leading to have to click the console-section to get it in focus, to receive I am not seeing this behaviour in XO5 at all.

                                    I do not see the same behaviour on Linux (Ubuntu 24.04) guests. But they are cli-only. No X/Wayland

                                    Commit: b89c26459cfd301bb92adf0a98a0b2dbab57e487
                                    node: 24.12.0
                                    Management agent 9.1.100-59 on both VMs

                                    Windows 11 has GPU passthrough & bios
                                    Windows Server 2025 - no GPU passthrough , uses uefi

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • A Offline
                                      acebmxer
                                      last edited by

                                      Just updated to latest commit - 8e2d9. Trying to create new VM in xov6 and a few issues to start.

                                      New vm settings

                                      • Ubuntu 24.04 template
                                      • 4 cpu cores
                                      • 6 gb of ram
                                      • Ubuntu iso mounted
                                      • No option to adjust topology for cpu cores.

                                      VM was created with 1 cpu core no iso disk mounted

                                      Screenshot 2026-01-07 175613.png

                                      Screenshot 2026-01-07 175622.png

                                      Screenshot 2026-01-07 175645.png

                                      Screenshot 2026-01-07 175657.png

                                      Screenshot 2026-01-07 175707.png

                                      Screenshot 2026-01-07 175720.png

                                      Screenshot 2026-01-07 175728.png

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • GheppyG Offline
                                        Gheppy
                                        last edited by

                                        For me it's a bit confusing XO6.
                                        For example, why are the icons so small and in such far corners, like New VM? It's like you want it to be hidden.
                                        174bdca5-6545-4f34-b7d4-804718aebd58-image.png

                                        Isn't it more intuitive if they're at the top/bottom of this menu or in line with title (***-xen01)?
                                        80e7222e-e104-4225-b928-4d8ee3094b15-image.png

                                        Another thing is the number of allocated processors. In my opinion it is misleading. It shows the total number of allocated processors even to VMs that are not started.
                                        It is not better to be something like:
                                        8 vCPUs running VMs / 4 vCPUs stopped VMs - total number allocated vCPUs 12/ Total CPUs 8.
                                        And something like 8 - green / 4 -red - 12 orange/ 8 grey
                                        594a774d-9ea8-4db3-9b8d-b46c525b70a8-image.png
                                        Running VM
                                        92387c99-40f8-4fbd-83fa-c6d32d48a72d-image.png

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • First post
                                          Last post