XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    82 Posts 26 Posters 3.9k Views 23 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G Offline
      Greg_E @olivierlambert
      last edited by

      @olivierlambert

      The odd part is that I'm happy with XO Lite, so not sure why 6 is causing me problems other than needing g to jump back to 5. I only have one XO new enough to be updated, I guess I need to update my lab since I'm in it a lot lately and come up with more productive comments for the team. The switch just immediately shocked me in a way that it shouldn't have done being that I've been using Lite to try and get ready.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Offline
        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        That's also because XO Lite is replacing basically "nothing before", while XO 5 is 10y full of features that we can't all re-implement at once in XO 6 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Tristis OrisT Offline
          Tristis Oris Top contributor
          last edited by

          Tasks still show completed actions, a month ago events.

          715d5ed4-fba3-4ae2-86a1-e878ecd90bc9-изображение.png

          No way to install updates. New ui less informative than the old one - no packages changelog.

          173a0295-06a0-4eee-a064-ba4f482962ef-изображение.png

          It also take a time to get into new navigation. Instead of static categories at sidebar, now i can't open Backup while inside pool settings. Need to do extra clicks.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by

            @tristis-oris

            See https://feedback.vates.tech/?tags=xo-6 (updates are planned already)

            For the rest, if it's a feedback that's not there and not a bug, feel free to add it 🙂

            MathieuM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • MathieuM Offline
              Mathieu @olivierlambert
              last edited by

              Has anyone tried to access XO 6 via a reverse proxy?
              I'm using nginx proxy manager in a docker container to access my XO instance.
              Everything is working fine with XO5 (both XOCE and XOA).
              But when trying to access XO6 through the reverse proxy, it shows only a few info, with a circle loading on the top and nothing on the left bar:
              7c0cc74d-19cc-4a9e-858a-f53913c654c6-image.png

              If I access XOCE and XOA v6 by their IP address, it's working as expected.

              Websocket support and cache is activated on the reverse proxy, nothing else fancy on that side.

              Thanks.

              P A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Online
                probain @Mathieu
                last edited by probain

                @Mathieu said in 🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!:

                Has anyone tried to access XO 6 via a reverse proxy?
                I'm using nginx proxy manager in a docker container to access my XO instance.
                Everything is working fine with XO5 (both XOCE and XOA).
                But when trying to access XO6 through the reverse proxy, it shows only a few info, with a circle loading on the top and nothing on the left bar:
                7c0cc74d-19cc-4a9e-858a-f53913c654c6-image.png

                If I access XOCE and XOA v6 by their IP address, it's working as expected.

                Websocket support and cache is activated on the reverse proxy, nothing else fancy on that side.

                Thanks.

                I haven't tried ngnix. But I access my though haproxy:443 - > xo:8443. And that works just fine. But there needed to be a couple of fixes upstream in master to iron out the quirks with non-443 ports and such.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Offline
                  acebmxer @Mathieu
                  last edited by

                  @Mathieu I do use NGINX Proxy Manager and i have no issues accessing XO-CE via the new v6 default or the old v5 with working links.

                  As @probain has stated there have been quite a few updates pushed to fix most issues. My issues were related to the script i used to install XO-CE. The script creator had to update the script to the recent changes made.

                  Make sure you are on the latest commit and/or update your script and try again.

                  MathieuM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • MathieuM Offline
                    Mathieu @acebmxer
                    last edited by

                    @acebmxer
                    I found the culprit:

                    HTTP/2 support needs to be enabled on the SSL tab of npm for v6 to work fine behind the reverse proxy.

                    It's now working fine.

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • A Offline
                      acebmxer @Mathieu
                      last edited by

                      @Mathieu ok. Yeah I already had that enabled. Glad you got it working.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • P Online
                        probain
                        last edited by probain

                        Windows guests Console - Reloads every 5-10s.

                        When trying to use the console for both my Windows 11 and Server 2025. The console reloads every 5-10s. This makes it borderline unusable. Since it resets the viewport/window scroll placement as well. Also the console seems to loose focus when this happens as well. Leading to have to click the console-section to get it in focus, to receive I am not seeing this behaviour in XO5 at all.

                        I do not see the same behaviour on Linux (Ubuntu 24.04) guests. But they are cli-only. No X/Wayland

                        Commit: b89c26459cfd301bb92adf0a98a0b2dbab57e487
                        node: 24.12.0
                        Management agent 9.1.100-59 on both VMs

                        Windows 11 has GPU passthrough & bios
                        Windows Server 2025 - no GPU passthrough , uses uefi

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post