XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing
-
Installed on my test systems and all seems to be working well so far.
-
Thank you for this report, I fear this issue appeared when we rebuilt bind with openssl-3
nslookup vates.com 8.8.8.8
I confirm this issue, note that bind-utils is not installed by default, let me investigate.
-
[09:43 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# nslookup vates.com 8.8.8.8 -bash: nslookup: command not found[10:21 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# yum install bind-utils -y Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org * xcp-ng-base: mirrors.xcp-ng.org Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org * xcp-ng-updates: mirrors.xcp-ng.org Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package bind-utils.x86_64 32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: bind-libs = 32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3 for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libbind9.so.90()(64bit) for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libdns.so.100()(64bit) for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libisc.so.95()(64bit) for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libisccc.so.90()(64bit) for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libisccfg.so.90()(64bit) for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: liblwres.so.90()(64bit) for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 --> Running transaction check ---> Package bind-libs.x86_64 32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3 will be installed --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ========================================================================================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ========================================================================================================================================= Installing: bind-utils x86_64 32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3 xcp-ng-updates 126 k Installing for dependencies: bind-libs x86_64 32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3 xcp-ng-updates 948 k Transaction Summary ========================================================================================================================================= Install 1 Package (+1 Dependent package) Total download size: 1.0 M Installed size: 3.0 M Downloading packages: (1/2): bind-libs-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64.rpm | 948 kB 00:00:00 (2/2): bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64.rpm | 126 kB 00:00:01 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 855 kB/s | 1.0 MB 00:00:01 Running transaction check Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded Running transaction Installing : 32:bind-libs-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 1/2 Installing : 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 2/2 Verifying : 32:bind-libs-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 1/2 Verifying : 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64 2/2 Installed: bind-utils.x86_64 32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3 Dependency Installed: bind-libs.x86_64 32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3 Complete! [10:22 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# nslookup vates.com 8.8.8.8 Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: vates.com Address: 172.67.205.118 Name: vates.com Address: 104.21.52.238 openssl_link.c:132: INSIST(dst__memory_pool != ((void *)0)) failed, back trace #0 0x7f419d8790e7 in ?? #1 0x7f419d87903a in ?? #2 0x7f419e486780 in ?? #3 0x7f419cc91df6 in ?? #4 0x7f419ccd8464 in ?? #5 0x7f419ccd8732 in ?? #6 0x7f419ccd7b8d in ?? #7 0x7f419b442bd9 in ?? #8 0x7f419b442c27 in ?? #9 0x7f419b42b44c in ?? #10 0x405818 in ?? Aborted (core dumpedEdit -No further issues to report at this time.
-
Installed on my usual batch of test hosts, no issues so far.
-
Hi,
I installed the update candidates within my test environment.
Updates installed fine, after reboot all looks good so far.
No apparent issues can be seen.
-
Maybe this schould be under XO/Backup
Anyhow.ph7 said:
Ran the 2 updates released today and...
Back to only showing one VM inBackup/Restoreas it did a month or 2 ago.
Ran the replication job and all VMs showed up inBackup/Restoreagain. (XO5)It occurred again today, only showing 1 VM in restore
XOdaefc
Host updated 2 weeks ago.
After 1 scheduled CR job ran all VMs showed up again -
-
In the back of my head I knew there was a thread and I found it
https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/12040/restore-only-showing-1-vm/21?_=1780396449511 -
@rzr
It seems to be working
edit: the update that is. -
@rzr Update installed and running on pools. Normal operations seem good. Had some issues with rolling pool reboot, but that happens a lot (unrelated to updates). An updated
bind-utilswould be nice, and any other SSL affected packages. -
We pushed the tested updates to the xcp-ng-updates repository, check blog post for summary and related advisories:
https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2026/06/02/june-2026-updates-1-for-xcp-ng-8-3-lts/Thank you again for feedback we will try to address reported issues on next batch (to come soon).
Note that some issues are not related to this specific update batch, but might have been introduced on previous ones (TBC).
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login