XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

rzr

@ph7 said:

Maybe this schould be under XO/Backup

Sure, It will not hurt to start a dedicated thread about this @storage issue, but it's not mandatory team is listening to your feedback anyway.

ph7

In the back of my head I knew there was a thread and I found it
https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/12040/restore-only-showing-1-vm/21?_=1780396449511

ph7

@rzr
It seems to be working
edit: the update that is.

Andrew

@rzr Update installed and running on pools. Normal operations seem good. Had some issues with rolling pool reboot, but that happens a lot (unrelated to updates). An updated bind-utils would be nice, and any other SSL affected packages.

rzr

We pushed the tested updates to the xcp-ng-updates repository, check blog post for summary and related advisories:
https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2026/06/02/june-2026-updates-1-for-xcp-ng-8-3-lts/

Thank you again for feedback we will try to address reported issues on next batch (to come soon).

Note that some issues are not related to this specific update batch, but might have been introduced on previous ones (TBC).

stormi

@Andrew We'll publish a fix for bind-utils, indeed, even if it's not part of the officially supported additional packages for XCP-ng, as it can be useful and we don't have strong reasons not to fix it.

Regarding other packages affected by the openssl update, @rzr handled many of them as part of the OpenSSL update back then already, so now we'll mostly rely on reports such as yours in case we missed something which is actually used by the user community.

stormi

@rzr said:

Thank you again for feedback we will try to address reported issues on next batch (to come soon).

Note that some issues are not related to this specific update batch, but might have been introduced on previous ones (TBC).

Not knowing myself what it meant, I asked Philippe: it's about the nslookup issue. And potentially the issue reported by @ph7 but it's not clear to me yet if there was a problem with XCP-ng or Xen Orchestra.

Anyway, basically this means that there's no known issue caused by this batch of updates, and that we'll keep addressing any relevant issue in the next updates if necessary, as usual.

acebmxer

Applied patches at work. 3 pools updated with zero issues.

marcoi

latest patches, host1 /master patches went well and rebooted. moved vms over.
host 2 in pool click on patch and it just sat there.

i ssh into the host2 yum clean metadata and yum update manually applied updates.
XO still showed host 2 needing patching, so i reboot it. XO still showed host 2 need patches.
I rebooted XO. host 2 shows patch, and task still remains in XO. Any idea how to clear it out from XO. or is it wait 24 hours kinds of thing?

rzr

@marcoi said:

i ssh into the host2 yum clean metadata and yum update manually applied updates.

Did you try to reboot it just after ?

XO still showed host 2 needing patching, so i reboot it

Seems not.

What about rebooting the host too ?

Let me pass the world to @Team-XO-Backend