XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    604 Posts 53 Posters 324.5k Views 73 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • acebmxerA Offline
      acebmxer
      last edited by

      Applied patches at work. 3 pools updated with zero issues.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • marcoiM Offline
        marcoi
        last edited by

        latest patches, host1 /master patches went well and rebooted. moved vms over.
        host 2 in pool click on patch and it just sat there.
        976ce535-3ff7-4043-a054-d18d7358aa3c-image.jpeg
        i ssh into the host2 yum clean metadata and yum update manually applied updates.
        XO still showed host 2 needing patching, so i reboot it. XO still showed host 2 need patches.
        I rebooted XO. host 2 shows patch, and task still remains in XO. Any idea how to clear it out from XO. or is it wait 24 hours kinds of thing?

        rzrR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • rzrR Offline
          rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @marcoi
          last edited by rzr

          @marcoi said:

          i ssh into the host2 yum clean metadata and yum update manually applied updates.

          Did you try to reboot it just after ?

          XO still showed host 2 needing patching, so i reboot it

          Seems not.

          What about rebooting the host too ?

          Let me pass the world to @Team-XO-Backend

          MathieuRAM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • MathieuRAM Offline
            MathieuRA Vates 🪐 XO Team @rzr
            last edited by

            Hi @rzr,
            When you say, "XO still showed host 2 needing patching", does that mean XO is still showing missing patches?

            If so, can you run the following command: xe host-call-plugin host-uuid=<uuid-host2> plugin=updater.py fn=check_update

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • marcoiM Offline
              marcoi
              last edited by

              after i manually applied the patches, i used XO to reboot the host 2.
              After the host 2 rebooted, XO still showed the task running and the host2 showed it needed to be patched. I rebooted XO and the task is still there ( been there for 13 hours now lol. ) but now host 2 shows patched

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Offline
                Pilow @marcoi
                last edited by

                @marcoi perhaps a restart toolstack would correct the phantom task ?
                but at the end of patching of the master a restart toolstack should have happened already, automatically...

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • rzrR Offline
                  rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by

                  New security update candidates for XCP-ng 8.3 LTS (kernel)

                  This release batch contains security fix on kernel, version update, some bug fixes and a few improvements.

                  What changed

                  Virtualization & System

                  • kernel: Fix Vulnerability: CVE-2026-46243

                    • Fixed the CIFSwitch security vulnerability that could allow privilege escalation from a user with low privileges.
                  • intel-microcode: Fix a hang on boot on some platforms (Revert Granite Rapids AP/SP ucode back to IPU 2026.1)

                  Drivers

                  • intel-ice: Update to 2.4.5
                    • Adds support for E825-C and E830.
                    • Adds support for Link Aggregation (LAG).
                    • Various stability, performance, and bug-fix updates.

                  Versions:

                  • intel-ice: 1.15.5-2.xcpng8.3 -> 2.4.5-8.1.1.xcpng8.3
                  • intel-microcode: 20260416-1.xcpng8.3 -> 20260416-2.xcpng8.3
                  • kernel: 4.19.19-8.0.46.5.xcpng8.3 -> 4.19.19-8.0.46.6.xcpng8.3

                  Test on XCP-ng 8.3

                  yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                  yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                  reboot
                  

                  The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

                  What to test

                  As usual, normal use and anything else you want to test.

                  Test window before official release of the updates

                  ~3 days

                  We would like to thank users who reported feedback since our last call for testing:

                  @Andrew, @acebmxer, @flakpyro, @jeffberntsen, @majorp93, @marcoi, @ph7, @pilow, @probain.

                  acebmxerA A B P J 7 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • acebmxerA Offline
                    acebmxer @rzr
                    last edited by acebmxer

                    @rzr

                    Installed updates on home lab. No issues to report initially other then nslookup still an issue.

                    [10:54 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# nslookup vates.com 8.8.8.8
                    Server:         8.8.8.8
                    Address:        8.8.8.8#53
                    
                    Non-authoritative answer:
                    Name:   vates.com
                    Address: 104.21.52.238
                    Name:   vates.com
                    Address: 172.67.205.118
                    
                    openssl_link.c:132: INSIST(dst__memory_pool != ((void *)0)) failed, back trace
                    #0 0x7f163cd960e7 in ??
                    #1 0x7f163cd9603a in ??
                    #2 0x7f163d9a3780 in ??
                    #3 0x7f163c1aedf6 in ??
                    #4 0x7f163c1f5464 in ??
                    #5 0x7f163c1f5732 in ??
                    #6 0x7f163c1f4b8d in ??
                    #7 0x7f163a95fbd9 in ??
                    #8 0x7f163a95fc27 in ??
                    #9 0x7f163a94844c in ??
                    #10 0x405818 in ??
                    Aborted (core dumped)
                    [12:50 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# 
                    
                    F rzrR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • F Offline
                      flakpyro @acebmxer
                      last edited by

                      Installed on my usual hosts, one of which has an E810 and used the ICE driver, no issues so far however i am not using LACP bonding on that host.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • rzrR Offline
                        rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @acebmxer
                        last edited by rzr

                        @acebmxer said:

                        @rzr
                        No issues to report initially other then nslookup still an issue.

                        openssl_link.c:132: INSIST(dst__memory_pool != ((void *)0)) failed, back trace
                        

                        Yes I looked at it, it looks like it's a design isssue that was fixed in later version of bind.

                        In details If I understand correctly this patched version of nslookup is facing a SIGARBT caused by an assert on previously cleanup resources (dst__memory_pool) which is unexpected in finishing part of the openssl thread (dst__openssl_destroy).

                        This bind patched version (where ssl support is in progress) is also known to have memory leaks, but those are resolved in later version, so until we catch up you'll probably have to live with this little annoyance on process exit unless we find (and validate) a better fix.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • A Offline
                          Andrew Top contributor @rzr
                          last edited by

                          @rzr Installed and running. Not expecting any issues because I'm not using SMB/CIFS, ice card, or CPU with affected microcode.

                          Rolling pool reboot failed me again... This time it got stuck evacuating a host with no VMs.

                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • B Offline
                            bufanda @rzr
                            last edited by

                            @rzr Installed on my usual lab pool. No immediate issues seen.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • P Offline
                              ph7 @rzr
                              last edited by

                              @rzr
                              👍

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M Offline
                                manilx @Andrew
                                last edited by

                                @Andrew I have the RPU failing most of the time now also. I have reported and opened a ticket. No solution so far. It's a hit and miss and beginning to be a PITA.

                                P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • P Offline
                                  Pilow @manilx
                                  last edited by

                                  @manilx yup, same here
                                  we evacuate & roll patch manually because RPU is inconsistent in achieving a full pool update nowadays

                                  maximum hosts in pools are 3, so it is still easy to process manually
                                  thoses with 5-6+ hosts must be more painful

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                    last edited by

                                    That would be interesting to group your findings/issues on RPU in a dedicated topic, because I don't think the logic changed recently 🤔 So it's an interesting investigation to make.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • J Offline
                                      JeffBerntsen Top contributor @rzr
                                      last edited by

                                      @rzr
                                      Seems to be working well on my test systems as well.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • marcoiM Offline
                                        marcoi
                                        last edited by

                                        update to latest test patches on 2nd pool. no issue. LACP worked, started UB26 VM on host 4 and live migrated to host 3.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • M Offline
                                          MajorP93 @rzr
                                          last edited by

                                          @rzr Installed those security update candidates in my XCP-ng test environment.
                                          So far no issues whatsoever. Basic operations all work. VMs running etc.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • rzrR Offline
                                            rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @rzr
                                            last edited by rzr

                                            rzr said:

                                            New security update candidates for XCP-ng 8.3 LTS (kernel)

                                            Test window before official release of the updates

                                            ~3 days

                                            The testing window is extended a bit, expect also a next batch (to be tested later this month).

                                            It has been planned to group updates for the convenience of administrators (stay tuned in blog).

                                            Meanwhile If you didn't notice yet, an updated xen-4.17.6-9.2.xcpng8.3 package landed in testing repo, it addresses some low risk vulnerabilities as reported at:

                                            • VSA-2026-017 (XSA-491, CVE-2026-42487)
                                            • VSA-2026-018 (XSA-492, CVE-2026-42489 - CVE-2026-42490),
                                            • VSA-2026-019 (CVE-2025-10263, XSA-493)
                                            • VSA-2026-020 (CVE-2026-42488, XSA-494)

                                            More to come soon

                                            B J acebmxerA A 4 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • First post
                                              Last post