XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    576 Posts 52 Posters 273.8k Views 74 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • rzrR Offline
      rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @acebmxer
      last edited by rzr

      @acebmxer said:

      @rzr
      No issues to report initially other then nslookup still an issue.

      openssl_link.c:132: INSIST(dst__memory_pool != ((void *)0)) failed, back trace
      

      Yes I looked at it, it looks like it's a design isssue that was fixed in later version of bind.

      In details If I understand correctly this patched version of nslookup is facing a SIGARBT caused by an assert on previously cleanup resources (dst__memory_pool) which is unexpected in finishing part of the openssl thread (dst__openssl_destroy).

      This bind patched version (where ssl support is in progress) is also known to have memory leaks, but those are resolved in later version, so until we catch up you'll probably have to live with this little annoyance on process exit unless we find (and validate) a better fix.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • A Online
        Andrew Top contributor @rzr
        last edited by

        @rzr Installed and running. Not expecting any issues because I'm not using SMB/CIFS, ice card, or CPU with affected microcode.

        Rolling pool reboot failed me again... This time it got stuck evacuating a host with no VMs.

        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • B Offline
          bufanda @rzr
          last edited by

          @rzr Installed on my usual lab pool. No immediate issues seen.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • P Offline
            ph7 @rzr
            last edited by

            @rzr
            👍

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              manilx @Andrew
              last edited by

              @Andrew I have the RPU failing most of the time now also. I have reported and opened a ticket. No solution so far. It's a hit and miss and beginning to be a PITA.

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Offline
                Pilow @manilx
                last edited by

                @manilx yup, same here
                we evacuate & roll patch manually because RPU is inconsistent in achieving a full pool update nowadays

                maximum hosts in pools are 3, so it is still easy to process manually
                thoses with 5-6+ hosts must be more painful

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • olivierlambertO Online
                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by

                  That would be interesting to group your findings/issues on RPU in a dedicated topic, because I don't think the logic changed recently 🤔 So it's an interesting investigation to make.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • J Offline
                    JeffBerntsen Top contributor @rzr
                    last edited by

                    @rzr
                    Seems to be working well on my test systems as well.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • marcoiM Offline
                      marcoi
                      last edited by

                      update to latest test patches on 2nd pool. no issue. LACP worked, started UB26 VM on host 4 and live migrated to host 3.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • M Online
                        MajorP93 @rzr
                        last edited by

                        @rzr Installed those security update candidates in my XCP-ng test environment.
                        So far no issues whatsoever. Basic operations all work. VMs running etc.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post