XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

ph7

Maybe this schould be under XO/Backup
Anyhow.

ph7 said:

Ran the 2 updates released today and...
Back to only showing one VM in Backup/Restore as it did a month or 2 ago.
Ran the replication job and all VMs showed up in Backup/Restore again. (XO5)

It occurred again today, only showing 1 VM in restore
XO daefc
Host updated 2 weeks ago.
After 1 scheduled CR job ran all VMs showed up again

rzr

@ph7 said:

Maybe this schould be under XO/Backup

Sure, It will not hurt to start a dedicated thread about this @storage issue, but it's not mandatory team is listening to your feedback anyway.

ph7

In the back of my head I knew there was a thread and I found it
https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/12040/restore-only-showing-1-vm/21?_=1780396449511

ph7

@rzr
It seems to be working
edit: the update that is.

Andrew

@rzr Update installed and running on pools. Normal operations seem good. Had some issues with rolling pool reboot, but that happens a lot (unrelated to updates). An updated bind-utils would be nice, and any other SSL affected packages.

rzr

We pushed the tested updates to the xcp-ng-updates repository, check blog post for summary and related advisories:
https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2026/06/02/june-2026-updates-1-for-xcp-ng-8-3-lts/

Thank you again for feedback we will try to address reported issues on next batch (to come soon).

Note that some issues are not related to this specific update batch, but might have been introduced on previous ones (TBC).

stormi

@Andrew We'll publish a fix for bind-utils, indeed, even if it's not part of the officially supported additional packages for XCP-ng, as it can be useful and we don't have strong reasons not to fix it.

Regarding other packages affected by the openssl update, @rzr handled many of them as part of the OpenSSL update back then already, so now we'll mostly rely on reports such as yours in case we missed something which is actually used by the user community.

stormi

@rzr said:

Thank you again for feedback we will try to address reported issues on next batch (to come soon).

Note that some issues are not related to this specific update batch, but might have been introduced on previous ones (TBC).

Not knowing myself what it meant, I asked Philippe: it's about the nslookup issue. And potentially the issue reported by @ph7 but it's not clear to me yet if there was a problem with XCP-ng or Xen Orchestra.

Anyway, basically this means that there's no known issue caused by this batch of updates, and that we'll keep addressing any relevant issue in the next updates if necessary, as usual.

acebmxer

Applied patches at work. 3 pools updated with zero issues.

marcoi

latest patches, host1 /master patches went well and rebooted. moved vms over.
host 2 in pool click on patch and it just sat there.

i ssh into the host2 yum clean metadata and yum update manually applied updates.
XO still showed host 2 needing patching, so i reboot it. XO still showed host 2 need patches.
I rebooted XO. host 2 shows patch, and task still remains in XO. Any idea how to clear it out from XO. or is it wait 24 hours kinds of thing?