XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    603 Posts 53 Posters 312.3k Views 74 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • acebmxerA Offline
      acebmxer @rzr
      last edited by acebmxer

      @rzr

      [09:43 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# nslookup vates.com 8.8.8.8
      -bash: nslookup: command not found
      
      [10:21 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# yum install bind-utils -y
      Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
      Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
      Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
       * xcp-ng-base: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
      Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
       * xcp-ng-updates: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
      Resolving Dependencies
      --> Running transaction check
      ---> Package bind-utils.x86_64 32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3 will be installed
      --> Processing Dependency: bind-libs = 32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3 for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64
      --> Processing Dependency: libbind9.so.90()(64bit) for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64
      --> Processing Dependency: libdns.so.100()(64bit) for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64
      --> Processing Dependency: libisc.so.95()(64bit) for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64
      --> Processing Dependency: libisccc.so.90()(64bit) for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64
      --> Processing Dependency: libisccfg.so.90()(64bit) for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64
      --> Processing Dependency: liblwres.so.90()(64bit) for package: 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64
      --> Running transaction check
      ---> Package bind-libs.x86_64 32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3 will be installed
      --> Finished Dependency Resolution
      
      Dependencies Resolved
      
      =========================================================================================================================================
       Package                      Arch                     Version                                    Repository                        Size
      =========================================================================================================================================
      Installing:
       bind-utils                   x86_64                   32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3                     xcp-ng-updates                   126 k
      Installing for dependencies:
       bind-libs                    x86_64                   32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3                     xcp-ng-updates                   948 k
      
      Transaction Summary
      =========================================================================================================================================
      Install  1 Package (+1 Dependent package)
      
      Total download size: 1.0 M
      Installed size: 3.0 M
      Downloading packages:
      (1/2): bind-libs-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64.rpm                                                                   | 948 kB  00:00:00     
      (2/2): bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64.rpm                                                                  | 126 kB  00:00:01     
      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total                                                                                                    855 kB/s | 1.0 MB  00:00:01     
      Running transaction check
      Running transaction test
      Transaction test succeeded
      Running transaction
        Installing : 32:bind-libs-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64                                                                               1/2 
        Installing : 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64                                                                              2/2 
        Verifying  : 32:bind-libs-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64                                                                               1/2 
        Verifying  : 32:bind-utils-9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3.x86_64                                                                              2/2 
      
      Installed:
        bind-utils.x86_64 32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3                                                                                               
      
      Dependency Installed:
        bind-libs.x86_64 32:9.9.4-63.1.xcpng8.3                                                                                                
      
      Complete!
      [10:22 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# nslookup vates.com 8.8.8.8
      Server:         8.8.8.8
      Address:        8.8.8.8#53
      
      Non-authoritative answer:
      Name:   vates.com
      Address: 172.67.205.118
      Name:   vates.com
      Address: 104.21.52.238
      
      openssl_link.c:132: INSIST(dst__memory_pool != ((void *)0)) failed, back trace
      #0 0x7f419d8790e7 in ??
      #1 0x7f419d87903a in ??
      #2 0x7f419e486780 in ??
      #3 0x7f419cc91df6 in ??
      #4 0x7f419ccd8464 in ??
      #5 0x7f419ccd8732 in ??
      #6 0x7f419ccd7b8d in ??
      #7 0x7f419b442bd9 in ??
      #8 0x7f419b442c27 in ??
      #9 0x7f419b42b44c in ??
      #10 0x405818 in ??
      Aborted (core dumped
      

      Edit -No further issues to report at this time.

      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • F Offline
        flakpyro @acebmxer
        last edited by

        Installed on my usual batch of test hosts, no issues so far.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • M Offline
          MajorP93
          last edited by

          Hi,

          I installed the update candidates within my test environment.

          Updates installed fine, after reboot all looks good so far.

          No apparent issues can be seen.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • P Offline
            ph7 @ph7
            last edited by

            Maybe this schould be under XO/Backup
            Anyhow.

            ph7 said:

            Ran the 2 updates released today and...
            Back to only showing one VM in Backup/Restore as it did a month or 2 ago.
            Ran the replication job and all VMs showed up in Backup/Restore again. (XO5)

            It occurred again today, only showing 1 VM in restore
            XO daefc
            Host updated 2 weeks ago.
            After 1 scheduled CR job ran all VMs showed up again

            rzrR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • rzrR Offline
              rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @ph7
              last edited by

              @ph7 said:

              Maybe this schould be under XO/Backup

              Sure, It will not hurt to start a dedicated thread about this @storage issue, but it's not mandatory team is listening to your feedback anyway.

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Offline
                ph7 @rzr
                last edited by

                In the back of my head I knew there was a thread and I found it
                https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/12040/restore-only-showing-1-vm/21?_=1780396449511

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P Offline
                  ph7 @rzr
                  last edited by ph7

                  @rzr
                  It seems to be working
                  edit: the update that is.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • A Offline
                    Andrew Top contributor @rzr
                    last edited by

                    @rzr Update installed and running on pools. Normal operations seem good. Had some issues with rolling pool reboot, but that happens a lot (unrelated to updates). An updated bind-utils would be nice, and any other SSL affected packages.

                    stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • rzrR Offline
                      rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by rzr

                      We pushed the tested updates to the xcp-ng-updates repository, check blog post for summary and related advisories:
                      https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2026/06/02/june-2026-updates-1-for-xcp-ng-8-3-lts/

                      Thank you again for feedback we will try to address reported issues on next batch (to come soon).

                      Note that some issues are not related to this specific update batch, but might have been introduced on previous ones (TBC).

                      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stormiS Offline
                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Andrew
                        last edited by

                        @Andrew We'll publish a fix for bind-utils, indeed, even if it's not part of the officially supported additional packages for XCP-ng, as it can be useful and we don't have strong reasons not to fix it.

                        Regarding other packages affected by the openssl update, @rzr handled many of them as part of the OpenSSL update back then already, so now we'll mostly rely on reports such as yours in case we missed something which is actually used by the user community.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stormiS Offline
                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @rzr
                          last edited by stormi

                          @rzr said:

                          Thank you again for feedback we will try to address reported issues on next batch (to come soon).

                          Note that some issues are not related to this specific update batch, but might have been introduced on previous ones (TBC).

                          Not knowing myself what it meant, I asked Philippe: it's about the nslookup issue. And potentially the issue reported by @ph7 but it's not clear to me yet if there was a problem with XCP-ng or Xen Orchestra.

                          Anyway, basically this means that there's no known issue caused by this batch of updates, and that we'll keep addressing any relevant issue in the next updates if necessary, as usual.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • acebmxerA Offline
                            acebmxer
                            last edited by

                            Applied patches at work. 3 pools updated with zero issues.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • marcoiM Offline
                              marcoi
                              last edited by

                              latest patches, host1 /master patches went well and rebooted. moved vms over.
                              host 2 in pool click on patch and it just sat there.
                              976ce535-3ff7-4043-a054-d18d7358aa3c-image.jpeg
                              i ssh into the host2 yum clean metadata and yum update manually applied updates.
                              XO still showed host 2 needing patching, so i reboot it. XO still showed host 2 need patches.
                              I rebooted XO. host 2 shows patch, and task still remains in XO. Any idea how to clear it out from XO. or is it wait 24 hours kinds of thing?

                              rzrR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • rzrR Offline
                                rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @marcoi
                                last edited by rzr

                                @marcoi said:

                                i ssh into the host2 yum clean metadata and yum update manually applied updates.

                                Did you try to reboot it just after ?

                                XO still showed host 2 needing patching, so i reboot it

                                Seems not.

                                What about rebooting the host too ?

                                Let me pass the world to @Team-XO-Backend

                                MathieuRAM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • MathieuRAM Offline
                                  MathieuRA Vates 🪐 XO Team @rzr
                                  last edited by

                                  Hi @rzr,
                                  When you say, "XO still showed host 2 needing patching", does that mean XO is still showing missing patches?

                                  If so, can you run the following command: xe host-call-plugin host-uuid=<uuid-host2> plugin=updater.py fn=check_update

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • marcoiM Offline
                                    marcoi
                                    last edited by

                                    after i manually applied the patches, i used XO to reboot the host 2.
                                    After the host 2 rebooted, XO still showed the task running and the host2 showed it needed to be patched. I rebooted XO and the task is still there ( been there for 13 hours now lol. ) but now host 2 shows patched

                                    P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • P Offline
                                      Pilow @marcoi
                                      last edited by

                                      @marcoi perhaps a restart toolstack would correct the phantom task ?
                                      but at the end of patching of the master a restart toolstack should have happened already, automatically...

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • rzrR Offline
                                        rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                        last edited by

                                        New security update candidates for XCP-ng 8.3 LTS (kernel)

                                        This release batch contains security fix on kernel, version update, some bug fixes and a few improvements.

                                        What changed

                                        Virtualization & System

                                        • kernel: Fix Vulnerability: CVE-2026-46243

                                          • Fixed the CIFSwitch security vulnerability that could allow privilege escalation from a user with low privileges.
                                        • intel-microcode: Fix a hang on boot on some platforms (Revert Granite Rapids AP/SP ucode back to IPU 2026.1)

                                        Drivers

                                        • intel-ice: Update to 2.4.5
                                          • Adds support for E825-C and E830.
                                          • Adds support for Link Aggregation (LAG).
                                          • Various stability, performance, and bug-fix updates.

                                        Versions:

                                        • intel-ice: 1.15.5-2.xcpng8.3 -> 2.4.5-8.1.1.xcpng8.3
                                        • intel-microcode: 20260416-1.xcpng8.3 -> 20260416-2.xcpng8.3
                                        • kernel: 4.19.19-8.0.46.5.xcpng8.3 -> 4.19.19-8.0.46.6.xcpng8.3

                                        Test on XCP-ng 8.3

                                        yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                                        yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                                        reboot
                                        

                                        The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

                                        What to test

                                        As usual, normal use and anything else you want to test.

                                        Test window before official release of the updates

                                        ~3 days

                                        We would like to thank users who reported feedback since our last call for testing:

                                        @Andrew, @acebmxer, @flakpyro, @jeffberntsen, @majorp93, @marcoi, @ph7, @pilow, @probain.

                                        acebmxerA A B P J 7 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • acebmxerA Offline
                                          acebmxer @rzr
                                          last edited by acebmxer

                                          @rzr

                                          Installed updates on home lab. No issues to report initially other then nslookup still an issue.

                                          [10:54 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# nslookup vates.com 8.8.8.8
                                          Server:         8.8.8.8
                                          Address:        8.8.8.8#53
                                          
                                          Non-authoritative answer:
                                          Name:   vates.com
                                          Address: 104.21.52.238
                                          Name:   vates.com
                                          Address: 172.67.205.118
                                          
                                          openssl_link.c:132: INSIST(dst__memory_pool != ((void *)0)) failed, back trace
                                          #0 0x7f163cd960e7 in ??
                                          #1 0x7f163cd9603a in ??
                                          #2 0x7f163d9a3780 in ??
                                          #3 0x7f163c1aedf6 in ??
                                          #4 0x7f163c1f5464 in ??
                                          #5 0x7f163c1f5732 in ??
                                          #6 0x7f163c1f4b8d in ??
                                          #7 0x7f163a95fbd9 in ??
                                          #8 0x7f163a95fc27 in ??
                                          #9 0x7f163a94844c in ??
                                          #10 0x405818 in ??
                                          Aborted (core dumped)
                                          [12:50 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# 
                                          
                                          F rzrR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • F Offline
                                            flakpyro @acebmxer
                                            last edited by

                                            Installed on my usual hosts, one of which has an E810 and used the ICE driver, no issues so far however i am not using LACP bonding on that host.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • First post
                                              Last post