XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    572 Posts 52 Posters 267.6k Views 75 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P Online
      Pilow @marcoi
      last edited by

      @marcoi perhaps a restart toolstack would correct the phantom task ?
      but at the end of patching of the master a restart toolstack should have happened already, automatically...

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • rzrR Offline
        rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        New security update candidates for XCP-ng 8.3 LTS (kernel)

        This release batch contains security fix on kernel, version update, some bug fixes and a few improvements.

        What changed

        Virtualization & System

        • kernel: Fix Vulnerability: CVE-2026-46243

          • Fixed the CIFSwitch security vulnerability that could allow privilege escalation from a user with low privileges.
        • intel-microcode: Fix a hang on boot on some platforms (Revert Granite Rapids AP/SP ucode back to IPU 2026.1)

        Drivers

        • intel-ice: Update to 2.4.5
          • Adds support for E825-C and E830.
          • Adds support for Link Aggregation (LAG).
          • Various stability, performance, and bug-fix updates.

        Versions:

        • intel-ice: 1.15.5-2.xcpng8.3 -> 2.4.5-8.1.1.xcpng8.3
        • intel-microcode: 20260416-1.xcpng8.3 -> 20260416-2.xcpng8.3
        • kernel: 4.19.19-8.0.46.5.xcpng8.3 -> 4.19.19-8.0.46.6.xcpng8.3

        Test on XCP-ng 8.3

        yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
        yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
        reboot
        

        The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

        What to test

        As usual, normal use and anything else you want to test.

        Test window before official release of the updates

        ~3 days

        We would like to thank users who reported feedback since our last call for testing:

        @Andrew, @acebmxer, @flakpyro, @jeffberntsen, @majorp93, @marcoi, @ph7, @pilow, @probain.

        acebmxerA A B P 4 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • acebmxerA Offline
          acebmxer @rzr
          last edited by acebmxer

          @rzr

          Installed updates on home lab. No issues to report initially other then nslookup still an issue.

          [10:54 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# nslookup vates.com 8.8.8.8
          Server:         8.8.8.8
          Address:        8.8.8.8#53
          
          Non-authoritative answer:
          Name:   vates.com
          Address: 104.21.52.238
          Name:   vates.com
          Address: 172.67.205.118
          
          openssl_link.c:132: INSIST(dst__memory_pool != ((void *)0)) failed, back trace
          #0 0x7f163cd960e7 in ??
          #1 0x7f163cd9603a in ??
          #2 0x7f163d9a3780 in ??
          #3 0x7f163c1aedf6 in ??
          #4 0x7f163c1f5464 in ??
          #5 0x7f163c1f5732 in ??
          #6 0x7f163c1f4b8d in ??
          #7 0x7f163a95fbd9 in ??
          #8 0x7f163a95fc27 in ??
          #9 0x7f163a94844c in ??
          #10 0x405818 in ??
          Aborted (core dumped)
          [12:50 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# 
          
          F rzrR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • F Offline
            flakpyro @acebmxer
            last edited by

            Installed on my usual hosts, one of which has an E810 and used the ICE driver, no issues so far however i am not using LACP bonding on that host.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • rzrR Offline
              rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @acebmxer
              last edited by rzr

              @acebmxer said:

              @rzr
              No issues to report initially other then nslookup still an issue.

              openssl_link.c:132: INSIST(dst__memory_pool != ((void *)0)) failed, back trace
              

              Yes I looked at it, it looks like it's a design isssue that was fixed in later version of bind.

              In details If I understand correctly this patched version of nslookup is facing a SIGARBT caused by an assert on previously cleanup resources (dst__memory_pool) which is unexpected in finishing part of the openssl thread (dst__openssl_destroy).

              This bind patched version (where ssl support is in progress) is also known to have memory leaks, but those are resolved in later version, so until we catch up you'll probably have to live with this little annoyance on process exit unless we find (and validate) a better fix.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • A Offline
                Andrew Top contributor @rzr
                last edited by

                @rzr Installed and running. Not expecting any issues because I'm not using SMB/CIFS, ice card, or CPU with affected microcode.

                Rolling pool reboot failed me again... This time it got stuck evacuating a host with no VMs.

                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • B Offline
                  bufanda @rzr
                  last edited by

                  @rzr Installed on my usual lab pool. No immediate issues seen.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • P Offline
                    ph7 @rzr
                    last edited by

                    @rzr
                    👍

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      manilx @Andrew
                      last edited by

                      @Andrew I have the RPU failing most of the time now also. I have reported and opened a ticket. No solution so far. It's a hit and miss and beginning to be a PITA.

                      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P Online
                        Pilow @manilx
                        last edited by

                        @manilx yup, same here
                        we evacuate & roll patch manually because RPU is inconsistent in achieving a full pool update nowadays

                        maximum hosts in pools are 3, so it is still easy to process manually
                        thoses with 5-6+ hosts must be more painful

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post