XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    785 Posts 64 Posters 982.9k Views 81 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • rzrR
      rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @MajorP93
      last edited by

      @MajorP93 said:

      Aaaaand it happened for the next VM.
      Apart from updating XO I did not change anything...
      It looks like RPU is failing on every single VM that has DMC enabled...
      To me it looks like a regression

      Hi, did you manage to sort it out ? if not your logs will help us to troubleshoot see related documentation as shared earlier:
      https://docs.xcp-ng.org/troubleshooting/log-files/#produce-a-status-report

      1 Reply Last reply
      Reply Quote 0
      • M
        MajorP93 @gduperrey
        last edited by MajorP93

        @gduperrey @rzr Hello!

        Sorry for the delayed response and thanks a lot for raising that topic internally.

        Due to these security patches being very critical/important I disabled DMC for all VMs that showed this issue (I think it was 6 Windows VMs) and patched the pool manually.

        After that everything worked perfectly fine.

        I wanted to react fast due to these security vulnerabilities and did not take the time to look at logs in /var/log etc.

        Interestingly for the second update you guys published one day after (the kernel TCP vulnerability patch) RPU worked without any issues.

        For now everything is stable and I will leave DMC disabled for these Windows VMs for now.

        I was just suprised because this exact configuration, that included DMC was working stable for quite a few months.

        However I can live without DMC on these VMs and am happy that everything is running stable.

        Thank you very much for reacting fast on these security vulnerabilities!
        I think you guys have a great process when it comes to this.

        Best regards

        1 Reply Last reply
        Reply Quote 3
        • lmolinaL
          lmolina Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
          last edited by lmolina

          New maintenance update candidates for XCP-ng 8.3 LTS

          This update is focused on security fixes.

          What changed

          • edk2:
            Sync with XenServer edk2-20220801-1.7.13. The update fixes vulnerabilities allowing an unauthenticated attacker on the local network to compromise a VM during PXE boot, or enable a guest VM administrator to bypass Secure Boot. See below the list of the corresponding CVEs:

            • CVE-2026-97631
            • CVE-2024-38796
            • CVE-2024-38797
            • CVE-2019-14560
            • CVE-2022-36763
            • CVE-2022-36764
            • CVE-2026-45447
            • CVE-2026-111497

          Versions

          • edk2: 20220801-1.7.11.2.xcpng8.3 -> 20220801-1.7.13.1.xcpng8.3

          Test on XCP-ng 8.3

          yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
          yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
          reboot # not mandatory but recommended for testing
          

          The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

          What to test

          As usual, normal use and anything else you want to test.

          Additionally, a cold boot (shutdown and start) of the UEFI VMs would also help testing the edk2 fix.

          Test window before official release of the updates

          About 4 days

          We would like to thank users who shared feedback since our last call for testing: @acebmxer, @jr-m4, @bufanda, @flakpyro, @Andrew, @MajorP93, @JeffBerntsen, @manilx, @XCP-ng-JustGreat, @john205, @Greg_E.

          We are aware of the frequency of these updates and strive to batch packages as much as possible. However, recent unplanned security updates require immediate attention. While drafting this message, we received another security update that we will release shortly.

          acebmxerA A X 3 Replies Last reply
          Reply Quote 2
          • acebmxerA
            acebmxer @lmolina
            last edited by acebmxer

            @lmolina

            installed updates no issues.... shutdown and cold booted windows 11 vm and a few linux vms no issues found.

            Update - Applying the linux kernel update to work hosts now. The host 1 in Tilton pool took about 5 min to reconnect to xoa/xoproxy after console showed host booted. Host 2 swapped vms and started its update and rebooted. It took about 1-2 min to reconnect.

            Host 1 does show more output prior to the console fully loading then compared to host 2. I did not get a picture of the output. When I can reboot host again will try to catch the output.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Reply Quote 3
            • A
              Andrew Top contributor @lmolina
              last edited by

              @lmolina Update seems good. Booted all UEFI VMs normally. Booted Secure UEFI Windows 10 fine.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Reply Quote 1
              • X
                XCP-ng-JustGreat @lmolina
                last edited by XCP-ng-JustGreat

                @lmolina Latest update candidate edk2 fix applied without issue to my four host home lab pool. I tested one BitLocker encrypted Windows 11 VM with full shutdown and restart. What surprised me is that the VM booted back up fine. I was expecting that anything that changed the Tiano UEFI guest firmware might bork BitLocker unless it was suspended prior to applying the hypervisor host fix. (e.g. PowerShell Suspend-BitLocker -MountPoint "C:" -RebootCount 0 suspends BitLocker for an infinite number of guest reboots until it is explicitly resumed.) Apparently, this particular update doesn't alter any part of the guest firmware that causes a noticeable change to BitLocker. As a result, the boot volume unlocks and boots normally. Note that a firmware update on a physical machine generally is noticed by BitLocker. This is the reason the OEM's firmware installer suspends BitLocker with RebootCount 1 before performing the update's finishing reboot.

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                Reply Quote 2
                • D
                  dinhngtu Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @XCP-ng-JustGreat
                  last edited by dinhngtu

                  @XCP-ng-JustGreat Windows VMs will pass the Measured Boot check even after an edk2 update if BitLocker is set up to only use Secure Boot for integrity validation (see the "Configure TPM platform validation profile for native UEFI firmware configurations" policy, PCRs 7 and 11)

                  X 1 Reply Last reply
                  Reply Quote 2
                  • X
                    XCP-ng-JustGreat @dinhngtu
                    last edited by XCP-ng-JustGreat

                    @dinhngtu Thank you for bringing the TPM platform validation profile to my attention. I see that there is yet another nuance to the firmware boot process I didn't fully understand. I'm going to dig into those TPM group policies to see what that's all about. (Later on . . .) Found them, here:
                    image.jpeg

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply Quote 0
                    • vxgmichelV
                      vxgmichel Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by

                      New kernel version in xcp-ng-testing for the next XCP-ng 8.3 LTS security update

                      We're adding a new kernel version to the security update we're planning for tomorrow.

                      What changed

                      • kernel:
                        • Security fixes in the Xen netback and blkback drivers, XSA-526, XSA-527 and XSA-528.
                        • Synchronization with XenServer release 4.19.19-8.0.49. In this release, the XCP-ng patches for CVE-2026-98432 (possible race condition occurring during concurrent processing of re-transmitted TCP connection requests) have been removed as they are now part of the XenServer release. Also included are patches for CVE-2026-31431, a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's cryptographic interface known as "Copy Fail" that could allow unprivileged accounts to gain root privileges. As a mitigation, the authencesn module was disabled in the previous XCP-ng kernel release. It is now re-enabled. Finally, it includes patches for CVE-2021-47103, a use-after-free vulnerability in the TCP IP protocol.
                        • Fixes for the following CVEs are also included:
                          • CVE-2026-31659
                          • CVE-2026-31678
                          • CVE-2026-43502
                          • CVE-2026-52912
                          • CVE-2026-52923
                          • CVE-2026-52924
                          • CVE-2026-68376
                          • CVE-2026-74480
                          • CVE-2026-74957
                          • CVE-2026-80714
                          • CVE-2026-52929
                          • CVE-2026-63834
                          • CVE-2026-43042
                          • CVE-2026-72255

                      Versions

                      • kernel: 4.19.19-8.0.46.14.xcpng8.3 -> 4.19.19-8.0.49.3.xcpng8.3

                      Test on XCP-ng 8.3

                      yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                      yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                      reboot
                      

                      The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

                      What to test

                      As usual, normal use and anything else you want to test.

                      Test window before official release of the updates

                      1 day

                      We would like to thank users who shared feedback since our last call for testing:
                      @acebmxer, @Andrew, @XCP-ng-JustGreat

                      acebmxerA 1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply Quote 0
                      • acebmxerA
                        acebmxer @vxgmichel
                        last edited by

                        @vxgmichel

                        installed no issues to report. Cold booted windows 11 vm and linux vm. Backup job ran also with no issues.

                        Running transaction
                          Updating   : kernel-4.19.19-8.0.49.3.xcpng8.3.x86_64                                                                  1/2 
                          Cleanup    : kernel-4.19.19-8.0.46.14.xcpng8.3.x86_64                                                                 2/2 
                          Verifying  : kernel-4.19.19-8.0.49.3.xcpng8.3.x86_64                                                                  1/2 
                          Verifying  : kernel-4.19.19-8.0.46.14.xcpng8.3.x86_64                                                                 2/2
                        
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post