• XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Pinned
    297
    1 Votes
    297 Posts
    97k Views
    J
    @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing: IMPORTANT NOTICE! After publishing the updates, we discovered a very nasty bug when using the UEFI certificates that we distribute. Long story short, they're too big, and there's only limited space (57K), and combined to a preexisting bug in varstored, this will cause the VM to stop booting after Windows or any other OS attempts to append to the DBX (revocation database). We pulled the varstored update, but those who updated can be affected. There are conditions for the issue: Existing VMs are not affected, unless you propagated the new certs to them New VMs are affected only if you never installed UEFI certs to the pool yourself (through XOA or secureboot-certs install), or cleared them using secureboot-certs clear in order to use our default certificates. If you have the affected version of varstored (rpm -q varstored yields varstored-1.2.0-3.1.xcpng8.3) : on every host, downgrade it with yum downgrade varstored-1.2.0-2.3.xcpng8.3. No reboot or toolstack restart required. if you have affected UEFI VMs, that is VMs that meet the conditions above but are not broken yet, don't install updates, turn them off, and fix them by deleting their DBX database: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/guides/guest-UEFI-Secure-Boot/#remove-certificates-from-a-vm. This has to be done when the VM is off. Your OS will add its own DBX afterwards. If you already have broken VMs (this warning reaching you too late), revert to a snapshot or backup. Other ways to fix them will require a patched varstored currently in the making. @dinhngtu A little trick for the future when determining whether a user’s system, is affected by a bad update based on version, as well as remediation checks. You can use “yum history list <packagename>”, to retrieve transaction IDs. The script can then iterate over the transaction IDs retrieving the package versions. The specific transaction info can be retrieved with “yum history info <transaction_id>”. This will enable you to go back much further, thus seeing if remediation is required more easily!!
  • What is what: XCP-ng, XCP-ng Center, XenOrchestra, XOA, Vates

    Pinned
    1
    9 Votes
    1 Posts
    10k Views
    No one has replied
  • XCP-ng Center 25.04 Released

    25
    6 Votes
    25 Posts
    17k Views
    M
    @uberiain at this point, when I am uninstall the old XCP-ng center software, and install the new msi, I just realized the xcp-ng keeps the settings file in Roaming folder. (C:\Users\user\AppData\Roaming\XCP-ng) When I deleted it I could re-register the servers.
  • XCP-ng Windows PV tools announcements

    Moved
    31
    0 Votes
    31 Posts
    2k Views
    H
    @archw and forgot to type "Not compatible with the "Manage Citrix PV drivers via Windows Update" option. You must disable this option before installing."
  • IPv6 support in XCP-ng for the management interface - feedback wanted

    65
    6 Votes
    65 Posts
    33k Views
    B
    @psafont Sounds good on point #1. On point #2 I agree LLA shouldn't be the primary management IPv6 address on the interface, but you could run into trouble by not having a LLA address assigned at all. All of the IPv6 standards assume a LLA is assigned to an interface running IPv6 for things like NDP or RA to work ergo mysterious things could break as a result of an LLA address not being assigned. Just spitballing here, but if you're concerned that only an LLA would be assigned to an interface then perhaps there could be logic to disable IPv6 for said management interface if no non-LLA address is assigned, or IPv4 could be preferred if only LLA addresses as assigned?
  • Citrix Releases New XenServer SDK 25.30.0 - 15-Sep-2025

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    529 Views
    No one has replied
  • XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing

    Moved
    717
    2 Votes
    717 Posts
    2m Views
    gduperreyG
    XCP-ng 8.2 has just reached its end of life, but the adventure continues with XCP-ng 8.3 (and other versions to come). You can read the communication on this point on our blog: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2025/09/16/xcp-ng-8-2-lts-reached-its-end-of-life/ To continue benefiting from updates and developments, we invite you, if you haven't already done so, to upgrade your systems to XCP-ng 8.3. A relevant thread has been around for quite some time if you want to participate in early testing of the updates: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/9964/xcp-ng-8-3-updates-announcements-and-testing/
  • USB + GPU pass-though issue

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    1k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Yes, the old method should work
  • XSA-468: multiple Windows PV driver vulnerabilities - update now!

    65
    3 Votes
    65 Posts
    12k Views
    G
    @TrapoSAMA All of mine are 2022, but saw this in previous driver versions with 2025. Low priority on this so I haven't fixed it yet.
  • Fail to add new efi boot entry. No space left on device

    7
    1
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    M
    @dinhngtu Thanks and good point. After my previous post I did stumble across some info (can't find the links) that suggested something similar. If I'm remembering correctly, the basic idea was the flash/NVRAM memory on the motherboard, which stores boot entries, is limited. If it's full, it's possible / may be necessary to do some cleanup using the bios itself or utilities available for Linux (efibootmgr) and Windows (bcdedit). I've not tried this myself as our install is working properly, but perhaps that can help someone else in the event they stumble across this particular issue.
  • Live migration from VMware not working, only when I power off the VM

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    620 Views
    M
    @Danp Oh thanks, that makes sense, though I am not sure how I got it to work in the POC... Cold migration will be fine for the time being anyway
  • LargeBlockSR for 4KiB blocksize disks

    14
    5 Votes
    14 Posts
    3k Views
    dthenotD
    @yllar Maybe it was because of the loopdevice not being completely created indeed. No error for this GC run. Everything should be ok then
  • Need support with Citrix server 6.1

    7
    2
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    871 Views
    D
    @MW6 You've lost two disks in a single array, you're data is lost. Time to restore from backup.
  • Bringing modern virtualization in the Arm-powered Datacenter

    18
    3 Votes
    18 Posts
    4k Views
    G
    @olivierlambert The only place running XCP-ng on things like an RK3588 make sense is for home lab stuff, I probably wouldn't even build work lab stuff on these. Never enough ram (so far) and limited cores, plus almost everything will need to be running in virtual processor architecture. All that said, it might be neat to simulate these ARM processors in x86 so that we could create a VM of the Pi, etc.
  • Export VM with ova format from XOA to VMware

    4
    1
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    olivierlambertO
    On the VMware side, it's possible VMware doesn't set the right mode, so try to boot in BIOS or UEFI to see if it boots.
  • EOL: XCP-ng Center has come to an end (New Maintainer!)

    Locked
    98
    1
    11 Votes
    98 Posts
    55k Views
    borzelB
    As this thread is no longer used to write about its original subject, i close it. Please open new threads for your questions or discussions.
  • XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback 🚀

    Locked
    792
    5 Votes
    792 Posts
    2m Views
    stormiS
    This is the end for this nice and useful thread, as XCP-ng 8.3 is not a beta nor a RC anymore: it's a supported release now. However, we still need your feedback, as we publish update candidates ahead of their official release, for users to test them. Right now, there's a security update candidate which is to be tested. I strongly invite everyone who is currently subscribed to this thread to now subscribe to the new, dedicated thread: XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing, and to verify that their settings allow sending notification e-mails and/or other forms of notification.
  • XenServer VM Tools 9.3.3 from Citrix causes bluescreen

    32
    1 Votes
    32 Posts
    12k Views
    HolgiBH
    @igor You are welcome !
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    709 Views
    stormiS
    @john-c As I mentioned in the release notes, @dinhngtu told me (and tested) that if Secure Boot is enforced, then Bitlocker doesn't fail on unexpected firmware changes. Maybe worth giving it a try?
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1 Views
    No one has replied