Xen Orchestra

• C

  Remotes - NFS - Disk (Used / Total) blank after update
  • C.M.  

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  28
  Views

  C

  @C-M
• S

  VM console borks with "Alt Gr" key
  • S.Pam  

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  19
  Views

  

  Yes, but it's always more tricky in a browser than in a heavy client
• L

  Problem with file level restore from delta backup from LVM parition
  • lukas  

  36
  0
  Votes
  36
  Posts
  289
  Views

  S

  Hi again, apologies for my tardiness. I've switched to Ubuntu server rather than Debian and all appears to be well again. I can only assume that it is an environment/dependency issue in Debian.
• A

  Import OVA silently fails
  • Andrew C  

  23
  0
  Votes
  23
  Posts
  113
  Views

  B

  @olivierlambert Thanks!
• D

  SOLVED Name of file backup
  • dimpas  

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  22
  Views

  

  Hi, No. Using UUIDs is vital to have consistent files (if you change the VDI or VM name etc.) Any XO, even a fresh one, is able to connect to your remote and restore your backup. So there's no need to access files directly.
• F

  How to save Statistic from XOA when rebooting the XCP-NG Nodes?
  • fluffy-bunny  

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  23
  Views

  

  It should be the same result on XCP-ng Center: it uses RRDs files stored on the host. Why do you continue to talk about the after the reboot? You mean after the upgrade, right? RRDs are preserved after a reboot If you do a yum update, those stats should be in theory preserved. If it's not the case, try to diagnose why, by comparing behavior between XCP-ng Center and XO. If it's not the same, then it's a client issue. If it's the same, then it means a version upgrade (yum or ISO) won't preserve RRDs. If you really want long terms stats for "real production" usage on long term, I strongly suggest that you think to store them in a real time series database, like Prometheus or so.
• M

  XO CR: Vlan does not follow for all Vif
  • moradin  

  10
  0
  Votes
  10
  Posts
  135
  Views

  M

  Hi, I have already the same problems, see pictures of a VM with some VIFs with differents VLAN, on a xcp-ng 8.0 hosts with separated NICS: And now a picture of the CR of this VM on another XCP-Ng host who just have 2 NIC with a vlan 110 and the second NIC is a trunk with several external VLAN added, same as the first xcp-ng host. The CR doesn't take automatiquly the good VLAN but they exist via the TRUNK NIC For me the solution is to have identicals NIC ont the both servers. But with the same name of VLAN, the CR could have the good VLAN no ? More simple to manage
• P

  SOLVED Citrix Hypervisor 8.1 Snapshot / Backup problem
  • PrzemoPOL  

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  57
  Views

  

  @dbeato Update on this. Basically I needed to run the Updates on the XCP-ng hosts even though they were on 8.1 and upgraded 5 packages. Once I did that since I had an Updated XOA system, then I reboot the servers and XOA and now backups are running!
• C

  [Jobs] invalid parameters (old jobs)
  • cocoon  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  33
  Views

  No one has replied

• F

  No Statistics in XOA after Rebooting our XCP-NG Nodes
  • fluffy-bunny  

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  54
  Views

  

  Nothing. You should have the stats visible in live (post-upgrade). That's it. If you don't, it might be because your nodes are behind a NAT.
• M

  XOA Proxy Console Log-In
  • mvogt  

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  27
  Views

  

  Hi, Please open a support ticket so we can assist you more efficiently https://support.vates.fr/
• B

  creat resource pool and benefit.
  • Bahman  

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  25
  Views

  

  You can, but as I said, in this case, you'll need to move the storage with it. Unlike with a shared storage, where only the RAM is migrated between 2 hosts. So RAM only migration is really faster than storage motion, especially true if the VM is using a large disk.
• F

  Disk Exclusion
  • frank-s  

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  35
  Views

  F

  Thank you
• 

  Could't find the base disk
  • txsastre  

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  35
  Views

  

  ok, I will do the backup again, will see in a few days. thanks.
• A

  Exported Xen Orchestra Config Contains Plaintext Host Passwords - Is This Intentional?
  • amp88  

  6
  1
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  64
  Views

  A

  @julien-f said in Exported Xen Orchestra Config Contains Plaintext Host Passwords - Is This Intentional?: @amp88 said in Exported Xen Orchestra Config Contains Plaintext Host Passwords - Is This Intentional?: Shouldn't the password hashes be stored in the .json file (as they appear to be for the users)? Does Xen Orchestra need to store plaintext versions to connect to the hosts? No, server passwords cannot be saved as hashes like we do for users, the use cases are completely different: for users, the password cannot be retrieved from the hashes. However that's not an issue because, when a user logs in, its password is hashed and compared to the stored hash for servers, we need to send the password itself, not a derived hash to the XCP-ng/XenServer host There is no way to securely hide these password except from encrypting them with a password provided by an external source, like a passphrase from the user, which may not be bad idea OK, thanks for the explanation. Allowing the user the option to secure the exported configuration with a password would be a welcome addition
• R

  Why are vLan Numbers NOT used in vNIC migration out of pool....
  xoa xcp-ng 8 migration vlan • • rjt  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  15
  Views

  No one has replied

• C

  SOLVED Netdata plugin: Open or closed source?
  • cfischer  

  11
  0
  Votes
  11
  Posts
  53
  Views

  

  It's not Netdata "cloud" but yes you'll have all the hosts automatically appear in XOA local Netdata install (as soon there's data present)
• M

  Backups not restoring xcp-ng8.1
  • markhewitt1978  

  14
  0
  Votes
  14
  Posts
  50
  Views

  

  That's why checking XAPI logs might be interesting to know what's used to find it's a duplicate.
• H

  Importing VM in Self service
  • hassan.syed  

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  70
  Views

  

  That's an interesting use case, I don't know how we could set a high prio for that, obviously a pro support ticket might raise this. Feel free anyway to create an issue on XO Github bug tracker
• G

  Adding an NFS as a "remote" setting
  • Gerhard Roediger  

  5
  0
  Votes
  5
  Posts
  47
  Views

  

  This message is pretty clear: your old backup job was linked to a remote that you removed. So if you start it after removing this remote, then it can't find this remote and fails.