Subcategories

  • VMs, hosts, pools, networks and all other usual management tasks.

    466 Topics
    4k Posts
    P
    @poddingue there is a notion of appliance too (group of VMs) https://docs.xcp-ng.org/appendix/cli_reference/#appliance-commands where you can start/stop a group of VMs, never tried it, doesn't seem to have a boot order in the vAPP neither
  • ACLs, Self-service, Cloud-init, Load balancing...

    103 Topics
    859 Posts
    J
    @gcpeters4 said: @john.c This is a good idea as well. If the previous suggestion of trying to do a DNS round robin approach doesn't work, this may be my best option. Thanks for taking the time to provide your suggestion! By the way my suggestion is recommended best practice from Microsoft for their Active Directory software and/or technology. My suggestion will be more likely to work if your DNS servers and requests have issues with Round Robin configuration. Plus with my solution you can easily add more servers as domain controllers to the cluster, as required and use replication to keep them consistent and up to date.
  • All XO backup features: full and incremental, replication, mirrors...

    501 Topics
    5k Posts
    P
    hello there, still XOA 6.3.3 here. since the last big XObackup & CR reworking, we have an annoying bug [image: 1778328477250-6db625da-2a61-4860-bc50-5c6adae0ae33-image.jpeg] This VM is 2.17Tb [image: 1778328523117-bc28b5ef-f37d-4bf9-b016-921309c17353-image.jpeg] how can be the KEY is 9.1Gb ? In fact the KEY size is good, but when retention of 10 points is obtained, the merging of last incremental in the first KEY point of the chain erase the size. So in our restore view, data sizes are all wrong, based on the sum of this key + 9 inc [image: 1778328703332-2e0a1587-365a-404f-9186-2b909605b3fa-image.jpeg] @florent could you do something about that ?
  • Everything related to Xen Orchestra's REST API

    85 Topics
    633 Posts
    DustyArmstrongD
    @florent OK cool, thank you for the info.
  • Terraform, Packer or any tool to do IaC

    50 Topics
    469 Posts
    dalemD
    @afk I’ve got two draft nixpkgs for libvhdi and Xen orchestra from sources respectively, I’ll look into submitting them upstream soon but take a look and feel free to share any feedback xen-orchestra-ce libvhdi.
  • Some VMs Booting to EFI Shell in Air-gapped XOA Instance

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    ?
    Good-day Folks, While troubleshooting this issue with my sales rep, I shared a screenshot of one of my VMs and he noted that it was odd that the boot disk was connected as device xvdb instead of xvda. So he asked me to go through and check if the VMs that were having problems booting, looked similar. I went through and confirmed that all the VMs that were failing to boot did not have an “xvda” device. I went through the Storage menu and found a few disks that did not have a name or description, which was quite odd (to say the least). I mounted each disk, one at a time, to one of the VMs and booted until I identified and renamed each of them. As it stands now, I’ve been able to get all the VMs back up and running again. However, that leaves some unanswered questions: How does taking a snapshot of a the MAIL01 VM (which was built with two disks – Disk1 for OS and Disk2 for Data), cause the VM to have its xvda device detached, and snowball that to other VMs? How is it that VDIs that I name myself during VM creation, all of a sudden become detached from their VMs and lose their name and description? How does a VM Template lose its disk? Because I was able to identify the disk that’s supposed to be attached to the template, but now it’s orphaned, and I don’t know how to re-attach it to the template. In any case, I’m glad this happened in this lab environment, so I'm willing to work with you all at Vates to see if we can do a root cause analysis to prevent this in the future. All I did was take a snapshot, and this is certainly not the experience I should have had (nor is what I'm used to seeing). Some screenshots to illustrate what I saw: [image: 1732747097783-screenshot_netxms01_no_vdi.png] [image: 1732747097860-screenshot_netxms01_no_vdi_2.png]
  • new smb remote fails

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    755 Views
    G
    @gonzametal I modified sudoers and could create the folder in the terminar but the error still there (I think because the syscall). I will install as root again to avoid this kind of issues in the future
  • VDI migration

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    DanpD
    @sb2014 I've encountered this particular issue once before, and these were the steps we used to correct it -- Shutdown the VM Export the snapshot's VDI from the SR's DIsks tab using XVA file format Forget the snapshot Import the XVA file created in the earlier step Attach the newly imported disk to the target VM Start the VM to verify that it boots correctly Regards, Dan
  • Changing the VM Advanced setting "Viridian" doesn't stick

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    596 Views
    DanpD
    I confirm this behavior. Checking with the dev team to see if this is by design.
  • Active directory authentication

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    2k Views
    G
    @dinhngtu LDP is using SSL, and no firewall between, so I think there be a ldaps misconfiguration
  • Deleting a VM template?

    Solved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    594 Views
    W
    @Danp Thanks. My fault, I didn't notice the 2nd page of templates where it was.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1 Views
    No one has replied
  • xo-server-auth-saml

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    320 Views
    olivierlambertO
    Hi, You should use the UI to config the plugin, but I suppose you are asking to pass extra parameters that aren't displayed/existing?
  • Change the network device for remotes throws "mount.nfs: Connection timed out"

    Solved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    874 Views
    R
    @olivierlambert Oh my... I totally forgot to change the network interface on XO after the change. That was my mistake. Sorry. But thanks a million for pointing it out.
  • Tag management for Storage not able to choose from existing tags

    3
    1
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    456 Views
    MathieuRAM
    Hi Indeed. We will see how we can fix this bug. Thanks
  • Intermediate cert xen orchestra

    Solved
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    762 Views
    A
    I bundled the cert and it is working as expected now. Thanks!
  • Sum of actuall provisioned SR space compared to used space

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    275 Views
    ForzaF
    I haven't seen it in XOA, but in XCP-ng Center, this information is available: [image: 1731271441742-f7ec1a2b-1d23-4258-93e4-a29f5ba00a48-image.png]
  • Commit Number Not Updating?

    5
    2
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    696 Views
    A
    @Danp Sorry for the delay, in the end I waited for a nother commit to come out and update to it, once I'd done so the issue was fixed. Thanks for your help either way.
  • "Xenserver 8" with PVS Accelerator showing Full Orphan VDIs

    Solved
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    Hi @infecticide, the fix for this issue has been been merged and will be available in the next release (5.100.1)
  • xoa not show host patch?

    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    171 Views
    No one has replied
  • Storage Bar Graph Misinformation

    Unsolved
    9
    1
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    1k Views
    T
    I have another weird one. The numeric representative is correct, but the bar graph is unintuitive. [image: 1730944307575-aa347240-cb22-4cde-acb0-ac741e44151a-image.png]
  • Encrypt Server Passwords

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    3k Views
    J
    @olivierlambert said in Encrypt Server Passwords: I'm not saying it's not possible, I'm saying this will be at the huge expense of usability. One such software implementation of a KMIP protocol server, which is in software form is an open source fork of HashiCorp Vault. This open source fork is called OpenBao (https://openbao.org/).
  • XOA / XCP-ng NTP?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    olivierlambertO
    I think on recent XOA we even switched to systemd-timesyncd. Pinging @thomas-dkmt so he can update the doc to fix it (only the new doc directly! oh and you can ask @julien-f for details if needed, thanks!).
  • Is it possible to do this with VM list filters?

    Solved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    848 Views
    J
    @Danp You're right, I missed the question mark on it when I tried it before. With the question mark, it works. Thank you for your help.
  • Logs Partition Full

    59
    0 Votes
    59 Posts
    40k Views
    X
    How can I determine which VM is causing this problem? Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830066:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830198:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830311:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830458:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830605:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830712:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830797:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830885:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831006:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831094:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831185:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831260:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831333:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831407:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831478:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831551:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.884264:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.884519:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.884615:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.884721:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.923891:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924054:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924207:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924319:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924505:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924675:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924803:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924913:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927026:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927185:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927303:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927436:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927657:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927772:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927903:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927993:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.928136:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.928255:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.928396:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.928479:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.932786:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.932906:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017)