1. Home
  2. Xen Orchestra

Subcategories

  • VMs, hosts, pools, networks and all other usual management tasks.

    487 Topics
    4k Posts
    tjkreidlT
    @carloum70 Are all your hosts properly time sychronized to NTP or chronyc? Check each host for offsets. They need to be really close in time with each other. And what HA heartbeat client setup are you using? As long as you have a quorum, HA should continue to work fine. WHen you get down to two hosts and one cannot communicate with the other is when things get critical (unless running HA-Lizard on a two-host pool).

  • ACLs, Self-service, Cloud-init, Load balancing...

    106 Topics
    869 Posts
    T
    @mpiton Thanks for looking into this, I guess it wasn't apparent that I needed to click the Save Configuration button for that plugin. I did that and confirmed that the secret now survives an xo-server restart. Thanks again!

  • All XO backup features: full and incremental, replication, mirrors...

    534 Topics
    6k Posts
    J
    Same thing here: Commit: a1dba XO5 transfers ~ 9-20GB XO6 transfers ~ 100-180GB [image: image.jpeg] [image: image.jpeg]

  • Everything related to Xen Orchestra's REST API

    88 Topics
    654 Posts
    poddingueP
    Pretty cool, @samuelolavo, thanks for clarifying!

  • Terraform, Packer or any tool to do IaC

    52 Topics
    488 Posts
    CyrilleC
    New release ! Cloud Controller Manager v1.2.0 https://github.com/vatesfr/xenorchestra-cloud-controller-manager/releases/tag/v1.2.0 Adds a new cloud-node-out-of-service controller that applies the node.kubernetes.io/out-of-service=nodeshutdown:NoExecute taint to the nodes whose Xen Orchestra VM is halted or has been deleted. More about this feature in the documentation or #90
Log in to post
Load new posts
  • A

    Commit Number Not Updating?

    5
    2
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    A
    @Danp Sorry for the delay, in the end I waited for a nother commit to come out and update to it, once I'd done so the issue was fixed. Thanks for your help either way.
  • I

    "Xenserver 8" with PVS Accelerator showing Full Orphan VDIs

    Solved
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    Hi @infecticide, the fix for this issue has been been merged and will be available in the next release (5.100.1)
  • robytR

    xoa not show host patch?

    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    236 Views
    No one has replied
  • T

    Storage Bar Graph Misinformation

    Unsolved
    9
    1
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    I have another weird one. The numeric representative is correct, but the bar graph is unintuitive. [image: aa347240-cb22-4cde-acb0-ac741e44151a-image.png]
  • jeffmetalJ

    Encrypt Server Passwords

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    4k Views
    J
    @olivierlambert said in Encrypt Server Passwords: I'm not saying it's not possible, I'm saying this will be at the huge expense of usability. One such software implementation of a KMIP protocol server, which is in software form is an open source fork of HashiCorp Vault. This open source fork is called OpenBao (https://openbao.org/).
  • C

    XOA / XCP-ng NTP?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    olivierlambertO
    I think on recent XOA we even switched to systemd-timesyncd. Pinging @thomas-dkmt so he can update the doc to fix it (only the new doc directly! oh and you can ask @julien-f for details if needed, thanks!).
  • J

    Is it possible to do this with VM list filters?

    Solved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    @Danp You're right, I missed the question mark on it when I tried it before. With the question mark, it works. Thank you for your help.
  • X

    Logs Partition Full

    59
    0 Votes
    59 Posts
    47k Views
    X
    How can I determine which VM is causing this problem? Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830066:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830198:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830311:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830458:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830605:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830712:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830797:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.830885:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831006:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831094:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831185:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831260:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831333:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831407:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831478:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.831551:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.884264:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.884519:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.884615:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.884721:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.923891:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924054:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924207:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924319:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924505:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924675:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924803:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.924913:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927026:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927185:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927303:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927436:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927657:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927772:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927903:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.927993:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.928136:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.928255:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.928396:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail2 Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.928479:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENBUS|CacheCreateObject: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.932786:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|__AllocatePages: fail1 (c0000017) Nov 1 13:05:00 df-c01-node04 qemu-dm-25[29890]: 29890@1730462700.932906:xen_platform_log xen platform: XENVIF|ReceiverPacketCtor: fail1 (c0000017)
  • P

    Bug?? Tree view XO v6

    Solved
    3
    1
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    650 Views
    P
    @Danp Yes of course You are correct I moved it to local storage a few weeks ago My bad
  • K

    Filtering multiple hosts by name

    Solved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    olivierlambertO
    That's the right way, yes Enjoy!
  • S

    Building Xen Orchestra 6 from scratch

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    642 Views
    olivierlambertO
    Hi, From the XO root folder, just do a yarn run turbo run build --filter @xen-orchestra/web and then access the XO URL with /v6 in the end.
  • L

    [SOLVED] Missing Plugins

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    629 Views
    L
    @llabtaem This issue has been resolved. I just needed to rebuild Xen Orchestra after adding the symbolic links. Then the plugins registered and I can now see them in the console.
  • humitoH

    Error restore backup

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    humitoH
    @olivierlambert said in Error restore backup: No I mean the file level restore feature from XO. If it all worked, I'm curious to understand why you had this issue in the first place. Did you restore the entire chain? We had to restore the entire VM as a new instance from Xen Orchestra using the delta backup. However, the same error occurred with each restore point. So, we manually copied the backup files from XOA and imported them.
  • D

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    5 Views
    No one has replied
  • I

    Forgot password for the webgui

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    5k Views
    J
    @peder Thanks, it works
  • A

    Free Xen Orchestra?

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    25k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Thanks for your feedback, we'll improve the doc.
  • B

    XOA says not up to date after 8.3 upgrade

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Check your NTP is correctly configured. For the rest, it works then
  • M

    XCP-ng Tools Storage contains VDIs I’m unable to Destroy

    Solved
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    @gduperrey said in XCP-ng Tools Storage contains VDIs I’m unable to Destroy: It seems that it is possible to clean old isos manually, via the command line, as explained in this forum post: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/15703 Wau!!! That actually works like charm! Thank you sooooo much!
  • S

    Project Pyrgos

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    5k Views
    olivierlambertO
    We had to reorg a bit the team, with the creation of an internal devops team. We hope to get some cool news in the following months
  • mauzillaM

    Benchmarks between XCP & TrueNAS

    20
    1
    0 Votes
    20 Posts
    9k Views
    mauzillaM
    @andrewperry yes, we replicate TrueNAS to a "standby" TrueNAS using zpool / truenas replication. Our current policy is hourly. We then (plan) to do Incremental replication of all VM's to a standby TrueNAS over weekends giving a 3 possible methods for recovery. Currently we're running into a major drawback with VM's on TrueNAS over NFS (specifically VM's that rely on fast storage such as databases and recordings). We did not anticipate such a huge drop in performance having VHD files over NFS. We're reaching out to XCP to ask them to give us some advice as it could likely be in part due to customization we can make.