XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    VDI not showing in XO 5 from Source.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Management
    30 Posts 13 Posters 1.6k Views 11 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DanpD Online
      Danp Pro Support Team
      last edited by

      Hi,

      Can you show us the output from the following command?

      xe vdi-param-list uuid=<uuid_of_target_vdi>
      

      Dan

      W A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W Offline
        wmazren @Danp
        last edited by

        @Danp said in VDI not showing in XO 5 from Source.:

        xe vdi-param-list uuid=

        Hi Dan,

        [18:52 mycsskvdcxcp03 ~]# xe vdi-param-list uuid=5f899e22-f3a7-4f0b-8de6-2b8058c0f575
        
        uuid ( RO)                    : 5f899e22-f3a7-4f0b-8de6-2b8058c0f575
                      name-label ( RW): ADSIM-UAT_DISK01
                name-description ( RW):
                   is-a-snapshot ( RO): false
                     snapshot-of ( RO): d31f2db0-be21-4794-b858-1bea357869c8
                       snapshots ( RO):
                   snapshot-time ( RO): 19700101T00:00:00Z
              allowed-operations (SRO): clone; snapshot
              current-operations (SRO):
                         sr-uuid ( RO): 5d22cba7-fbf6-a03b-bb73-9ffba3a3ee75
                   sr-name-label ( RO): SR-HDD-DEV-2
                       vbd-uuids (SRO): c6f4c7fa-4f6f-7999-d13c-3a29d887d828
                 crashdump-uuids (SRO):
                    virtual-size ( RO): 171798691840
            physical-utilisation ( RO): 50272698880
                        location ( RO): 5f899e22-f3a7-4f0b-8de6-2b8058c0f575
                            type ( RO): User
                        sharable ( RO): false
                       read-only ( RO): false
                    storage-lock ( RO): false
                         managed ( RO): true
             parent ( RO) [DEPRECATED]: <not in database>
                         missing ( RO): false
                    is-tools-iso ( RO): false
                    other-config (MRW):
                   xenstore-data (MRO):
                       sm-config (MRO): host_OpaqueRef:c3426081-ce96-507b-a219-8d2cb124c3ad: RW; read-caching-enabled-on-e1594701-28e9-4127-858e-74d4663669f8: true
                         on-boot ( RW): persist
                   allow-caching ( RW): false
                 metadata-latest ( RO): false
                metadata-of-pool ( RO): <not in database>
                            tags (SRW):
                     cbt-enabled ( RO): false
        
        
        [18:54 mycsskvdcxcp03 ~]#
        

        Best regards,
        Azren

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J Offline
          johnhabs
          last edited by

          I just noticed I am seeing the same thing on some of my virtual machines. When I view the Disks tab for a vm in the Xen Orchestra 5 ui it shows no items found but XO6 will lists the disks associated with this vm. It only appears to be affecting 2 out of the 4 hosts that I have connected to the xoa instance but is not affecting all the virtual machines of those hosts. It seems to be impacting disks on both local and nfs storage pools.

          There are no errors reported and the vm's are running fine and I can take snapshots and execute backup tasks, stop and start the vms without any problems. It just seems that the XOA v5 vm disks display is no longer able to find the disks for certain vms.

          I am running version 6.0.2 XOA build: 20251101 from the latest channel.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Online
            Andrew Top contributor @Danp
            last edited by

            @Danp I have also seen this problem with XO, but currently do not have an example to test. This was an issue on both local SR and shared SR on NFS.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              Let me ping @team-xo-frontend

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • MathieuRAM Offline
                MathieuRA Vates 🪐 XO Team @wmazren
                last edited by

                @wmazren Hi.
                Weird,i am unable to reproduce the issue..

                Can you show us the output from the following command?
                xe vbd-param-list uuid=c6f4c7fa-4f6f-7999-d13c-3a29d887d828

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • florentF Offline
                  florent Vates 🪐 XO Team
                  last edited by

                  @wmazren said in VDI not showing in XO 5 from Source.:

                         is-a-snapshot ( RO): false
                           snapshot-of ( RO): d31f2db0-be21-4794-b858-1bea357869c8
                  

                  this disk is now recognized as a snapshot by xo
                  is it a disk from a restored VM ?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A Offline
                    abudef
                    last edited by abudef

                    Hi,
                    I’m afraid I’ve encountered the same problem:

                    • Xen Orchestra, commit 0b52a
                      e9d960d3-930c-4b81-bff1-50644a62be78-image.png

                    • v6
                      da2e5259-fb1b-4703-bf99-ca7828bed2c9-image.png

                    P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P Offline
                      Pilow @abudef
                      last edited by Pilow

                      😕

                      I am also impacted on some SRs, latest XOA 6.0.3

                      In the VM DISKS tab, no disk
                      e64c1143-5c66-4918-bf09-255868da37a8-{14091121-3DE9-4E4C-8DC6-ACAE262294BA}.png

                      VM is running OK. can snapshot, can backup.

                      on the impacted SR (local RAID5 for this one) I noted that there is no more green progress bar as if SR is empty, but showing 47 VDIs and occupied space OK :
                      557e3927-604f-443e-9dad-4d0249bb2813-{BAE0069B-4449-4EBF-8262-E9BCDD7E4A2C}.png

                      DISKS tab of the SR is showing the VDIs on the running VMs :
                      38be29c7-0ec4-44b2-909a-bec1f8f1bf71-{48C0989B-A413-45C9-BF28-87DA09CB8BEA}.png

                      as @danp asked, check of params on one impacted VDI & VBD :

                      # xe vdi-param-list uuid=a81ecd87-3788-4528-819d-7d7c03aa6c61
                      uuid ( RO)                    : a81ecd87-3788-4528-819d-7d7c03aa6c61
                                    name-label ( RW): xxx-xxx-xxxxxx_sda
                              name-description ( RW):
                                 is-a-snapshot ( RO): false
                                   snapshot-of ( RO): f9cbd30f-a261-4b95-97db-b6846147634a
                                     snapshots ( RO): cb65b96a-bed9-4e9a-82d3-e73b5aed546d
                                 snapshot-time ( RO): 20250912T17:38:57Z
                            allowed-operations (SRO): snapshot; clone
                            current-operations (SRO):
                                       sr-uuid ( RO): b1b80611-7223-c829-8953-6aa2bf5865b3
                                 sr-name-label ( RO): xxx-xx-xxxxxxx RAID5 Local
                                     vbd-uuids (SRO): 51bb1797-c6c7-50f0-13a9-dfaad4c99d90
                               crashdump-uuids (SRO):
                                  virtual-size ( RO): 68719476736
                          physical-utilisation ( RO): 30686765056
                                      location ( RO): a81ecd87-3788-4528-819d-7d7c03aa6c61
                                          type ( RO): User
                                      sharable ( RO): false
                                     read-only ( RO): false
                                  storage-lock ( RO): false
                                       managed ( RO): true
                           parent ( RO) [DEPRECATED]: <not in database>
                                       missing ( RO): false
                                  is-tools-iso ( RO): false
                                  other-config (MRW):
                                 xenstore-data (MRO):
                                     sm-config (MRO): vhd-parent: daeee201-3891-443e-8bdb-b00ed1051279; host_OpaqueRef:3e7283ba-5a42-1881-958a-9f96b71fb98f: RW; read-caching-enabled-on-f2868da5-4509-43d7-9ef9-2bb3857e1ba5: true
                                       on-boot ( RW): persist
                                 allow-caching ( RW): false
                               metadata-latest ( RO): false
                              metadata-of-pool ( RO): <not in database>
                                          tags (SRW):
                                   cbt-enabled ( RO): true
                      
                      
                      # xe vbd-param-list uuid=51bb1797-c6c7-50f0-13a9-dfaad4c99d90
                      uuid ( RO)                        : 51bb1797-c6c7-50f0-13a9-dfaad4c99d90
                                           vm-uuid ( RO): 108ad69b-1fa5-d80b-fb16-a62509ad642a
                                     vm-name-label ( RO): xxx-xxx-xxxxxx
                                          vdi-uuid ( RO): a81ecd87-3788-4528-819d-7d7c03aa6c61
                                    vdi-name-label ( RO): xxx-xxx-xxxxxx_sda
                                allowed-operations (SRO): attach; unpause; pause
                                current-operations (SRO):
                                             empty ( RO): false
                                            device ( RO): xvda
                                        userdevice ( RW): 0
                                          bootable ( RW): false
                                              mode ( RW): RW
                                              type ( RW): Disk
                                       unpluggable ( RW): false
                                currently-attached ( RO): true
                                        attachable ( RO): true
                                      storage-lock ( RO): false
                                       status-code ( RO): 0
                                     status-detail ( RO):
                                qos_algorithm_type ( RW):
                              qos_algorithm_params (MRW):
                          qos_supported_algorithms (SRO):
                                      other-config (MRW): owner:
                                       io_read_kbs ( RO): 0.000
                                      io_write_kbs ( RO): 93.752
                      
                      

                      VDI seen as a snapshot...
                      in XO6, VDI appears ok.
                      we have an internal webapp that access by API and disk appears OK, like in XO6.

                      seems to be rooted on the SR, not the VMs, as the entire SR is impacted... ? not all SRs in this XOA instance are impacted (have other RAID5 local SR and iSCSI SRs)
                      all VMs hosted on this SR have invisible disks in XO5

                      have an XO CE attached to same servers, and same behavior, invisible disks
                      9aaad5b2-c8e3-4057-a47d-8da39b5a4664-{9E011831-A228-4A0C-B12C-9EE224398B8E}.png

                      edit :
                      on GENERAL tab of an impacted VM :
                      a66f9b9e-b71a-4219-a8eb-68506284b47a-{4B5E10D1-2240-40E9-8EA4-88A41E97C738}.png
                      we can see a 0Bytes VDI, but activity
                      b7b73755-7bcf-4d9d-afd5-79dfa913cda9-{6EA81F62-B519-4711-A810-519D270D3102}.png

                      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P Offline
                        Pilow @Pilow
                        last edited by

                        tried to deploy a NEW vm for testing purpose on an impacted SR :
                        31059047-0663-4438-8131-dae10fdece65-{876A5496-1224-46ED-B5FB-282584D4CBAD}.png

                        and it appears ! it's the only VDI visible, there are OTHER vms on this same SR that have invisible disks

                        all as if nothing
                        10f77f41-6599-4ead-b7cb-101c5dc7f076-{DD14C76B-144E-4A0C-B985-01EBE178A1A0}.png

                        I guess we could migrate the impacted VMs out of this SR and back, and it would correct the issue !

                        does that help ?!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          @anthoineb or someone from the @team-storage, you might want to take a look (IDK if it's a known problem internally)

                          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A Offline
                            anthoineb Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @olivierlambert
                            last edited by

                            @olivierlambert Yes, we saw this before, we are investigating.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • olivierlambertO Offline
                              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                              last edited by

                              Thanks!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • P Pilow referenced this topic
                              • W Offline
                                wilsonqanda
                                last edited by

                                Hello All,

                                Found some roundabout solutions you may want to try:
                                https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/101370

                                P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • P Offline
                                  Pilow @wilsonqanda
                                  last edited by Pilow

                                  @wilsonqanda tried your workaround on a halted VM, and it worked !
                                  If i snapshot -> disk still invisible
                                  delete snapshot - > disk still invisible

                                  but

                                  if i snapshot --> disk still invisible
                                  revert snapshot (with take snapshot option) --> disk APPEAR again
                                  delete the two snapshots -> disks still there

                                  edit : even without the take snapshot before revert, it is working, tried on another VM

                                  W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • W Offline
                                    wilsonqanda @Pilow
                                    last edited by wilsonqanda

                                    @Pilow Lol glad I was able to help. Its only if you have a few VMs having hundreds will be a nightmare... giod luck to those that has that issue. In the meantime I will use the method I mention for now. 🙂

                                    P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • P Offline
                                      Pilow @wilsonqanda
                                      last edited by

                                      @wilsonqanda @anthoineb @olivierlambert

                                      we are now impacted on a SR that didn't have the problem... now all disks are invisible and DASHBOARD/HEALTH show some strange dates on base copies...
                                      d5265b22-03b4-4ae0-8b78-ee531b4fb273-{3A056D6D-FEF9-49E4-8480-C63F654E4BF0}.png

                                      halt/snap/revert correct the issue but needs to be done on each VM

                                      all VDIs seem to be regrouped strangely on unique base copy
                                      5dc3b390-4068-4c2c-a871-89c5f8f32005-{CDACDC19-0C4E-4674-BCAE-37F75C7528A2}.png

                                      there is something seriously wrong happening 😞

                                      no impact on production of VMs though, just management issues in XOA web ui 😢
                                      even backups are OK.

                                      halp.

                                      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • P Offline
                                        Pilow @Pilow
                                        last edited by Pilow

                                        i could be wrong but in

                                        /usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/dist/xapi-object-to-xo.mjs
                                        

                                        I see a lot of

                                        if (obj.is_a_snapshot || obj.$snapshot_of !== undefined)
                                        

                                        seems to be a way of managing both "old version" and "new version" (or "broader version") to define if a VDI is a snapshot
                                        there has been an evolution in the code at some point ?

                                        and someone somewhere in recent updates (10 dec) forgot the || on some important action

                                        my recent SR problem appeared when I was snapshoting/deleting VDI/reverting snapshot
                                        all VMs suddenly didn't have visible VDIs anymore on the whole SR.

                                        I could be wrong, but the fact that ALL VDIs are now seen as snapshot seems smelly with this ||

                                        1c4ed798-5ec8-4bb7-9ab1-df34bbe15e58-image.png

                                        https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/commit/85596da79217070bf4431135bbb5b0d2cf04e45b

                                        0 spacotte-vates committed to vatesfr/xen-orchestra
                                        fix(xo-server): improve handling of xapi snapshots (#9231)
                                        
                                        In some cases, when converting an xapi object into an xo object, the xapi.is_a_snapshot param may be set to false even tho the xapi.snapshotOf refers to another xapi object. Handle this case better.
                                        W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • W Offline
                                          wilsonqanda @Pilow
                                          last edited by wilsonqanda

                                          @Pilow now that you mention that everything is seen as snapshot i remember all my ISO are seen as snapshots too... so most iso cannot be mounted until i drag them in a folder then put them back in same folder so XO could reprocess all the iso correctly. This might be a related issue to all the snapshots for the VMs.

                                          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • P Offline
                                            Pilow @wilsonqanda
                                            last edited by Pilow

                                            @wilsonqanda strangely my ISOs were not impacted, except for the default XCP TOOLS iso that seems gone

                                            the "base copy" regroup bug on homepage of the SR, and the orphan base copies in the DASHBOARD/HEALTH seems to be linked to same problem

                                            we have much fast clones VMs depending on those base copies seen as orphan

                                            we are narrowing on the problem, just need the dev to level it, have faith 😃

                                            W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post