XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    VDI not showing in XO 5 from Source.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Management
    17 Posts 11 Posters 361 Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J Offline
      johnhabs
      last edited by

      I just noticed I am seeing the same thing on some of my virtual machines. When I view the Disks tab for a vm in the Xen Orchestra 5 ui it shows no items found but XO6 will lists the disks associated with this vm. It only appears to be affecting 2 out of the 4 hosts that I have connected to the xoa instance but is not affecting all the virtual machines of those hosts. It seems to be impacting disks on both local and nfs storage pools.

      There are no errors reported and the vm's are running fine and I can take snapshots and execute backup tasks, stop and start the vms without any problems. It just seems that the XOA v5 vm disks display is no longer able to find the disks for certain vms.

      I am running version 6.0.2 XOA build: 20251101 from the latest channel.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A Online
        Andrew Top contributor @Danp
        last edited by

        @Danp I have also seen this problem with XO, but currently do not have an example to test. This was an issue on both local SR and shared SR on NFS.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          Let me ping @team-xo-frontend

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • MathieuRAM Offline
            MathieuRA Vates 🪐 XO Team @wmazren
            last edited by

            @wmazren Hi.
            Weird,i am unable to reproduce the issue..

            Can you show us the output from the following command?
            xe vbd-param-list uuid=c6f4c7fa-4f6f-7999-d13c-3a29d887d828

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • florentF Offline
              florent Vates 🪐 XO Team
              last edited by

              @wmazren said in VDI not showing in XO 5 from Source.:

                     is-a-snapshot ( RO): false
                       snapshot-of ( RO): d31f2db0-be21-4794-b858-1bea357869c8
              

              this disk is now recognized as a snapshot by xo
              is it a disk from a restored VM ?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Offline
                abudef
                last edited by abudef

                Hi,
                I’m afraid I’ve encountered the same problem:

                • Xen Orchestra, commit 0b52a
                  e9d960d3-930c-4b81-bff1-50644a62be78-image.png

                • v6
                  da2e5259-fb1b-4703-bf99-ca7828bed2c9-image.png

                P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P Offline
                  Pilow @abudef
                  last edited by Pilow

                  😕

                  I am also impacted on some SRs, latest XOA 6.0.3

                  In the VM DISKS tab, no disk
                  e64c1143-5c66-4918-bf09-255868da37a8-{14091121-3DE9-4E4C-8DC6-ACAE262294BA}.png

                  VM is running OK. can snapshot, can backup.

                  on the impacted SR (local RAID5 for this one) I noted that there is no more green progress bar as if SR is empty, but showing 47 VDIs and occupied space OK :
                  557e3927-604f-443e-9dad-4d0249bb2813-{BAE0069B-4449-4EBF-8262-E9BCDD7E4A2C}.png

                  DISKS tab of the SR is showing the VDIs on the running VMs :
                  38be29c7-0ec4-44b2-909a-bec1f8f1bf71-{48C0989B-A413-45C9-BF28-87DA09CB8BEA}.png

                  as @danp asked, check of params on one impacted VDI & VBD :

                  # xe vdi-param-list uuid=a81ecd87-3788-4528-819d-7d7c03aa6c61
                  uuid ( RO)                    : a81ecd87-3788-4528-819d-7d7c03aa6c61
                                name-label ( RW): xxx-xxx-xxxxxx_sda
                          name-description ( RW):
                             is-a-snapshot ( RO): false
                               snapshot-of ( RO): f9cbd30f-a261-4b95-97db-b6846147634a
                                 snapshots ( RO): cb65b96a-bed9-4e9a-82d3-e73b5aed546d
                             snapshot-time ( RO): 20250912T17:38:57Z
                        allowed-operations (SRO): snapshot; clone
                        current-operations (SRO):
                                   sr-uuid ( RO): b1b80611-7223-c829-8953-6aa2bf5865b3
                             sr-name-label ( RO): xxx-xx-xxxxxxx RAID5 Local
                                 vbd-uuids (SRO): 51bb1797-c6c7-50f0-13a9-dfaad4c99d90
                           crashdump-uuids (SRO):
                              virtual-size ( RO): 68719476736
                      physical-utilisation ( RO): 30686765056
                                  location ( RO): a81ecd87-3788-4528-819d-7d7c03aa6c61
                                      type ( RO): User
                                  sharable ( RO): false
                                 read-only ( RO): false
                              storage-lock ( RO): false
                                   managed ( RO): true
                       parent ( RO) [DEPRECATED]: <not in database>
                                   missing ( RO): false
                              is-tools-iso ( RO): false
                              other-config (MRW):
                             xenstore-data (MRO):
                                 sm-config (MRO): vhd-parent: daeee201-3891-443e-8bdb-b00ed1051279; host_OpaqueRef:3e7283ba-5a42-1881-958a-9f96b71fb98f: RW; read-caching-enabled-on-f2868da5-4509-43d7-9ef9-2bb3857e1ba5: true
                                   on-boot ( RW): persist
                             allow-caching ( RW): false
                           metadata-latest ( RO): false
                          metadata-of-pool ( RO): <not in database>
                                      tags (SRW):
                               cbt-enabled ( RO): true
                  
                  
                  # xe vbd-param-list uuid=51bb1797-c6c7-50f0-13a9-dfaad4c99d90
                  uuid ( RO)                        : 51bb1797-c6c7-50f0-13a9-dfaad4c99d90
                                       vm-uuid ( RO): 108ad69b-1fa5-d80b-fb16-a62509ad642a
                                 vm-name-label ( RO): xxx-xxx-xxxxxx
                                      vdi-uuid ( RO): a81ecd87-3788-4528-819d-7d7c03aa6c61
                                vdi-name-label ( RO): xxx-xxx-xxxxxx_sda
                            allowed-operations (SRO): attach; unpause; pause
                            current-operations (SRO):
                                         empty ( RO): false
                                        device ( RO): xvda
                                    userdevice ( RW): 0
                                      bootable ( RW): false
                                          mode ( RW): RW
                                          type ( RW): Disk
                                   unpluggable ( RW): false
                            currently-attached ( RO): true
                                    attachable ( RO): true
                                  storage-lock ( RO): false
                                   status-code ( RO): 0
                                 status-detail ( RO):
                            qos_algorithm_type ( RW):
                          qos_algorithm_params (MRW):
                      qos_supported_algorithms (SRO):
                                  other-config (MRW): owner:
                                   io_read_kbs ( RO): 0.000
                                  io_write_kbs ( RO): 93.752
                  
                  

                  VDI seen as a snapshot...
                  in XO6, VDI appears ok.
                  we have an internal webapp that access by API and disk appears OK, like in XO6.

                  seems to be rooted on the SR, not the VMs, as the entire SR is impacted... ? not all SRs in this XOA instance are impacted (have other RAID5 local SR and iSCSI SRs)
                  all VMs hosted on this SR have invisible disks in XO5

                  have an XO CE attached to same servers, and same behavior, invisible disks
                  9aaad5b2-c8e3-4057-a47d-8da39b5a4664-{9E011831-A228-4A0C-B12C-9EE224398B8E}.png

                  edit :
                  on GENERAL tab of an impacted VM :
                  a66f9b9e-b71a-4219-a8eb-68506284b47a-{4B5E10D1-2240-40E9-8EA4-88A41E97C738}.png
                  we can see a 0Bytes VDI, but activity
                  b7b73755-7bcf-4d9d-afd5-79dfa913cda9-{6EA81F62-B519-4711-A810-519D270D3102}.png

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P Offline
                    Pilow @Pilow
                    last edited by

                    tried to deploy a NEW vm for testing purpose on an impacted SR :
                    31059047-0663-4438-8131-dae10fdece65-{876A5496-1224-46ED-B5FB-282584D4CBAD}.png

                    and it appears ! it's the only VDI visible, there are OTHER vms on this same SR that have invisible disks

                    all as if nothing
                    10f77f41-6599-4ead-b7cb-101c5dc7f076-{DD14C76B-144E-4A0C-B985-01EBE178A1A0}.png

                    I guess we could migrate the impacted VMs out of this SR and back, and it would correct the issue !

                    does that help ?!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      @anthoineb or someone from the @team-storage, you might want to take a look (IDK if it's a known problem internally)

                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A Offline
                        anthoineb Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @olivierlambert
                        last edited by

                        @olivierlambert Yes, we saw this before, we are investigating.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          Thanks!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P Pilow referenced this topic
                          • W Offline
                            wilsonqanda
                            last edited by

                            Hello All,

                            Found some roundabout solutions you may want to try:
                            https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/101370

                            P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • P Offline
                              Pilow @wilsonqanda
                              last edited by Pilow

                              @wilsonqanda tried your workaround on a halted VM, and it worked !
                              If i snapshot -> disk still invisible
                              delete snapshot - > disk still invisible

                              but

                              if i snapshot --> disk still invisible
                              revert snapshot (with take snapshot option) --> disk APPEAR again
                              delete the two snapshots -> disks still there

                              edit : even without the take snapshot before revert, it is working, tried on another VM

                              W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • W Offline
                                wilsonqanda @Pilow
                                last edited by wilsonqanda

                                @Pilow Lol glad I was able to help. Its only if you have a few VMs having hundreds will be a nightmare... giod luck to those that has that issue. In the meantime I will use the method I mention for now. 🙂

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post