XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    236 Posts 50 Posters 45.6k Views 40 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • julienXOvatesJ Offline
      julienXOvates Vates 🪐 XO Team
      last edited by

      @jr-m4 Thank you for this feedback. We'll try to make it better based on this !

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • N Offline
        nasheayahu
        last edited by

        Afternoon, my session timed out and I do get the normal login page, but when I login I get this UiAlert Message:

        Screenshot From 2026-05-28 12-51-11.png

        import{B as e,C as t,St as n,U as r,X as i,_ as a,g as o,h as s,m as c,t as l,x as u,xt as d}from"./_plugin-vue_export-helper-DqPMJZfB.js";import{n as f,t as p}from"./VtsIcon-BoVekVkM.js";import{t as m}from"./use-mapper-M_HHKN3j.js";import{t as h}from"./UiButtonIcon-Df9Z1TJo.js";var g={class:`content`},_={class:`alert typo-body-regular-small`},v={key:0},y=l(t({__name:`UiAlert`,props:{accent:{},close:{type:Boolean}},emits:[`close`],setup(t,{emit:l}){let y=l,b=i(),x=m(()=>t.accent,{info:`status:info-circle`,success:`status:success-circle`,warning:`status:warning-circle`,danger:`status:danger-circle`},`info`);return(i,l)=>(e(),a(`div`,{class:n([d(f)({accent:t.accent}),`ui-alert`])},[c(`div`,g,[u(p,{class:`information-icon`,name:d(x),size:`current`},null,8,[`name`]),c(`div`,_,[c(`div`,null,[r(i.$slots,`default`,{},void 0,!0)]),b.description?(e(),a(`div`,v,[r(i.$slots,`description`,{},void 0,!0)])):o(``,!0)]),t.close?(e(),s(h,{key:0,class:`close-button`,icon:`fa:xmark`,accent:`brand`,size:`small`,onClick:l[0]||=e=>y(`close`)})):o(``,!0)])],2))}}),[[`__scopeId`,`data-v-5b9f5cdd`]]);export{y as t};
        

        ... and after back-paging, I was able to login normally.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • julienXOvatesJ Offline
          julienXOvates Vates 🪐 XO Team @escape222
          last edited by

          @escape222 said:

          Slow booting on Debian 13 VM created from a template

          I recently tried cloning a VM from a template (created from a full install of Debian 13). What was noticed was that the system takes forever to boot when the VM is created from XO-6. The issue does not happen in XO-5. The VM seems to hang at the TianoCore boot screen Hang.png.

          What I noticed is that when the VM is cloned with XO-6 the boot order somehow changes to Network boot as the first option

          BootOrder.png

          This does not happen (change of boot order) if the VM is cloned from XO-5 and there is no boot delay. The boot process seems to wait for more than 2 minutes before it fails network boot and then proceeds normally to boot from the Hard drive
          Hang2.png

          Thanks

          Hi @escape222,
          For info boot order issue has been resolved in XO 6.5 !

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • julienXOvatesJ Offline
            julienXOvates Vates 🪐 XO Team @ph7
            last edited by

            @ph7 said:

            Xen Orchestra, commit 71fa8
            With a snapshot attached to a VM, it is reported to use 0% of 100GB
            7fecc14f-bea7-4acb-b5eb-9e2f3c0ac8e6-image.png

            And if I remove the snaphot
            e25ffd4b-796a-47a5-ae21-c2252d2ffc96-image.png

            And that seems to be more accurate

            Hi @ph7,
            The VDI storage used space with snapshots has been fixed in XO 6.5 !

            P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • P Offline
              ph7 @julienXOvates
              last edited by

              @julienXOvates
              Well not in my daefc witch is newer than 6.5.1
              d2391283-67c1-4c60-9fc1-7f90f6f1f7eb-image.jpeg

              b37742ca-add5-4579-b990-28e0dbca8be5-image.jpeg

              ph@romy:~$ df -h
              Filsystem      Storlek Använt Ledigt Anv% Monterat på
              udev              1,9G      0   1,9G   0% /dev
              tmpfs             392M   916K   391M   1% /run
              /dev/xvda2         93G   6,3G    82G   8% /
              tmpfs             2,0G      0   2,0G   0% /dev/shm
              efivarfs          128K    52K    72K  42% /sys/firmware/efi/efivars
              tmpfs             5,0M      0   5,0M   0% /run/lock
              tmpfs             1,0M      0   1,0M   0% /run/credentials/systemd-journald.service
              tmpfs             2,0G   4,0K   2,0G   1% /tmp
              /dev/xvda1        975M   8,8M   966M   1% /boot/efi
              tmpfs             1,0M      0   1,0M   0% /run/credentials/getty@tty1.service
              tmpfs             1,0M      0   1,0M   0% /run/credentials/serial-getty@hvc0.service
              tmpfs             392M    68K   392M   1% /run/user/105
              tmpfs             392M    68K   392M   1% /run/user/1000
              

              seems more like 8% to me

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Offline
                ph7 @ph7
                last edited by

                same in my XOA 6.5.1

                julienXOvatesJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • julienXOvatesJ Offline
                  julienXOvates Vates 🪐 XO Team @ph7
                  last edited by

                  OK, we'll have another look at it, sorry for this !

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P Offline
                    ph7 @julienXOvates
                    last edited by

                    @julienXOvates
                    The faulty ones are on local SR
                    If I take a manual snapshot on a NFS VM, I see the correct value

                    Will test a scheduled one

                    P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P Offline
                      ph7 @ph7
                      last edited by ph7

                      Local VMs vith scheduled Incremental or full Backup and CR are affected
                      NFS VMs vith scheduled Incremental or full Backup are affected
                      NFS VMs with CR not affected

                      julienXOvatesJ P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • julienXOvatesJ Offline
                        julienXOvates Vates 🪐 XO Team @ph7
                        last edited by

                        @ph7 Thanks for those details, very helpful. We'll have a look.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • P Offline
                          ph7 @ph7
                          last edited by ph7

                          ph7 said:

                          Local VMs vith scheduled Incremental Backup and CR are affected
                          NFS VMs vith scheduled Incremental Backup are affected

                          Incremental -> Incremental OR full

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          • First post
                            Last post